וַאֲשֶׁר֩ יָבֹ֨א אֶת־רֵעֵ֥הוּ בַיַּעַר֮ לַחְטֹ֣ב עֵצִים֒ וְנִדְּחָ֨ה יָד֤וֹ בַגַּרְזֶן֙ לִכְרֹ֣ת הָעֵ֔ץ וְנָשַׁ֤ל הַבַּרְזֶל֙ מִן־הָעֵ֔ץ וּמָצָ֥א אֶת־רֵעֵ֖הוּ וָמֵ֑ת ה֗וּא יָנ֛וּס אֶל־אַחַ֥ת הֶעָרִים־הָאֵ֖לֶּה וָחָֽי׃
Misalnya, orang yang pergi bersama sesamanya ke hutan untuk menebang kayu, lalu tangannya terayun dengan kapak untuk menebang pohon, dan mata kapak itu terlepas dari gagangnya serta mengenai sesamanya sehingga ia mati, maka orang itu boleh melarikan diri ke salah satu kota ini dan tetap hidup.
Jerusalem Talmud Makkot
Rebbi Jeremiah asked before Rebbi Abbahu: If one was using a roller going forward when another person stuck out his head and the roller hit him. He told him, there is no difference between upward and downward movement8This is a personal injury case, not one of homicide. The particular distinction derived from Deut. 19:5 is not applicable.. Rebbi Jeremiah asked before Rebbi Abbahu: If one was using a roller going forward when a child stuck out his hand and it was smothered. He told him, you are bothering me about this; there is no difference between upward and downward movement9If there is no negligence on the part of the operator, he is not liable and the distinction becomes meaningless..
Jerusalem Talmud Makkot
Bar Pedaia said, he shall flee22Deut. 19:5, speaking of the homicide. Cf. Notes 4,5., not his plotters.
Jerusalem Talmud Makkot
MISHNAH: If the iron slipped off the handle and killed, Rebbi said he does not go into exile, but the Sages say he does go. From the wood to split, Rebbi says he goes into exile, but the Sages say, he does not go10This is a matter of interpretation of Deut. 19:5 as explained in the Halakhah (Babli 7b/8a, Sifry Deut. 183.) The Babli points out that for the Sages indirect causation is not punishable as negligence, while for Rebbi it is..