Rujukan Talmud untuk Ulangan 26:10: Jerusalem Talmud Bikkurim, Jerusalem Talmud Orlah, Jerusalem Talmud Peah & Jerusalem Talmud Gittin

HALAKHAH: “How does one designate First Fruits? Etc.” In the opinion of Rebbi Simeon, if he did not call them when they were picked they are not sanctified, they do not create dema‘¹If they are mixed with profane fruits and are unrecognizable, the mixture is permitted to laymen., one is not required to add a fifth²If misappropriated, the amount of restitution has to be 100%, not 125%., and one is not whipped for them outside the wall³If eaten outside the city walls of Jerusalem.. What is the reason of the rabbis? (Deut. 26:10) “Now, behold, I brought the first of the fruits of the earth.” At the moment of presentation it must be a fruit, but also at the moment of dedication? Even unripe grapes, even unripe figs! In the opinion of Rebbi Simeon, since at the moment of presentation it must be a fruit, so also at the moment of dedication it must be a fruit.

Rebbi Assi in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan: Roots do not count. Rebbi Zeïra said to Rebbi Assi, did you hear that explicitly from Rebbi Joḥanan or did you discuss ‘orlah and this came up relating to First Fruits when he said, roots do not count⁴³Since in presenting First Fruits to the Temple the farmer has to declare (Deut. 26:10): “Here I brought the first of the fruits of the land You gave me,” one might think that a tree on the farmer’s land whose roots extend under the land of another owner would be disqualified for First Fruits. Maybe the statement of R. Joḥanan means only that any tree on the farmer’s land qualifies, without implications for the rules of ‘orlah?? Rebbi Zeïra said, what we say, roots do not count, if the roots spread from outside the Land into the Land. But when they spread from the Land to outside the Land they do count⁴⁴Any tree in the Land is obligated, even if its root started growing outside the Land. Any tree growing on any root which started to grow in the Land is also obligated..

“⁷⁸This is a Babylonian baraita, quoted in Babli Soṭa 14b, Zebaḥim 66a, Menaḥot 19b. The Babylonian character is shown by the use of אי as “if”. One puts them⁷⁹The First Fruits to be deposited near the altar. The problem treated is an apparent contradiction between the prescriptions contained in verses 4 and 10 of Chap. 26. near the South-West corner. (Deut. 26:10) ‘Before the Eternal’, that should mean the West. The verse says (Deut. 26:4) ‘at the face of the altar.’ If it is at the face of the altar that should mean the South⁸⁰The entrance to the Temple precinct was to the East. Going from East to West one has the outer and inner courtyards, then the Cohanim’s court containing the altar, and to the West the Temple building containing the holiest of holies, counted as the Presence of the Eternal. The access to the altar was via the ramp built at its South side. Therefore, “before the Eternal” means before the Temple building, to the West of the altar. “At the face of the altar” means at the South side.. The verse says ‘before the Eternal’! How is that? He presents them at the South-Western corner and puts them down South of the corner.”