וְהָיָ֗ה אִם־לֹ֤א תִשְׁמַע֙ בְּקוֹל֙ יְהוָ֣ה אֱלֹהֶ֔יךָ לִשְׁמֹ֤ר לַעֲשׂוֹת֙ אֶת־כָּל־מִצְוֺתָ֣יו וְחֻקֹּתָ֔יו אֲשֶׁ֛ר אָנֹכִ֥י מְצַוְּךָ֖ הַיּ֑וֹם וּבָ֧אוּ עָלֶ֛יךָ כָּל־הַקְּלָל֥וֹת הָאֵ֖לֶּה וְהִשִּׂיגֽוּךָ׃
Tetapi apabila engkau tidak mendengarkan suara Yang Mahakekal, Allahmu, untuk menjaga dan melakukan segala perintah-Nya dan ketetapan-Nya yang kuperintahkan kepadamu pada hari ini, maka segala kutuk ini akan datang kepadamu dan menyusul engkau.
Jerusalem Talmud Sotah
One could think that those on Mount Gerizim did recite the blessings and those on Mount Ebal did recite the curses, the verse91There is no such verse; both in Deut. 30:1 and Jos. 8:34 the singular is used. The plural is used for “blessings” in Deut. 28:2, for “curses” in Deut. 28:15. says “the blessings and the curses”; both were saying blessings and curses. One could think that after they had recited the blessings they were reciting the curses, the verse92Deut. 11:26, Jos. 8:34. From here on, a similar argument is in Sifry Deut. 55; that text is reproduced in the Babli, 37b. says “the blessing and the curse”, one blessing and one curse. One could think that those on Mount Gerizim did answer “Amen” after the blessings and those on Mount Ebal did answer “Amen” after the curses, the verse93Deut. 27:15. says “the entire people will answer and say “Amen”; these and those did answer “Amen” after the blessings and after the curses. How is that? When they were reciting the blessings they were turning their faces towards Mount Gerizim; when they were reciting the curses they were turning their faces towards Mount Ebal.
Jerusalem Talmud Peah
Rebbi Judah ben Pazi says: “I wrote down for him most of My teaching,” these are the admonitions102Lev. 26:14–46, Deut. 28:15–69.. Nevertheless, is it not that (Hos. 8:12) “they were considered foreign”.
Jerusalem Talmud Sotah
HALAKHAH: 158In the ms. and editio princeps: Halakhah 5.: “He does not write on a wooden plank,” etc. Rebbi Eleazar in the name of Rebbi Yose ben Zimra159In the Babli, Šebuot 36a, this is a statement of R. Yose ben R. Ḥanina, a younger contemporary of R. Yose ben Zimra. In Num. rabba 9(46) the reading is that of the Yerushalmi.: “Amen” [is said] for acceptance, “Amen” for an oath, “Amen”, may the words be confirmed. “Amen” [is said] for acceptance, from the suspected wife160Num. 5:22.. “Amen” for an oath: “To keep the oath I had sworn to your forefathers”, etc161Jer. 11:5: “To keep the oath I had sworn to your forefathers to give to them the Land flowing with milk and honey as today; I answered and said, Amen, o Eternal.”. “Amen”, may the words be confirmed1621K. 1:36.: “Benaiah ben Yehoyada (the priest) answered the king and said Amen”, etc. Rebbi Tanḥuma said, that does not prove that Amen means an oath, it implies nothing163The verse from Jeremiah only confirms what can be learned from the verse in Kings, that Amen is an affirmation.. But the following says: “that you pass by the covenant of your God and His curse164Deut. 29:11. The curse is Deut.28:15–68.,” because oath means curse, as you say165Num. 5:21. In the Babli, Šebuot35b, this is a tannaїtic statement. In Sifry Num. 14 the argument is: From the verse one infers that any oath implies a potential curse on the person taking the oath.: “The Cohen has to administer to the woman the oath of the curse.”