Tosefta untuk Ulangan 23:19

לֹא־תָבִיא֩ אֶתְנַ֨ן זוֹנָ֜ה וּמְחִ֣יר כֶּ֗לֶב בֵּ֛ית יְהוָ֥ה אֱלֹהֶ֖יךָ לְכָל־נֶ֑דֶר כִּ֧י תוֹעֲבַ֛ת יְהוָ֥ה אֱלֹהֶ֖יךָ גַּם־שְׁנֵיהֶֽם׃

Janganlah engkau membawa upah seorang pelacur atau harga seekor anjing ke dalam rumah Yang Mahakekal, Allahmu, untuk nazar apa pun, sebab keduanya itu pun keji bagi Yang Mahakekal, Allahmu.

Tosefta Bekhorot

Out of all the unclean domesticated animals, there are none that are liable in [the laws of] the first-born except for a donkey. Out of all the unclean wild animals, there are none that are forbidden on account of their sale-price [to donate to the Temple] except for a dog (Deut. 23:19). Rabbi Meir used to say, [as to] anyone who fulfills the commandment of the first-born donkey, they treat him as though he has fulfilled the commandment on behalf of every unclean domesticated animal, and [as to] anyone who disregards the commandment of the first-born donkey, they treat him as though he has disregarded the commandment on behalf of every unclean domesticated animal. Rabbi Yosei HaGalili says, behold, it says (Num. 18:17), "But a first-born bull or a first-born sheep or a first-born goat shall not be redeemed, [for] they are holy." A first-born bull: [The obligation does not apply] unless the birth-mother is a [female] bull and the offspring is a bull. A first-born sheep: Not unless the birth-mother is a sheep and the offspring is a sheep. A first-born goat: Not unless the birth-mother is a goat and the offspring is a goat. And if [the offspring] has even a few signs [of its species] similar to its mother, it is liable in [the law of] the first-born.
Tanya RabiBookmarkShareCopy

Tosefta Parah

Rabbi Eliezer says, [the red heifer] may not be purchased from idolaters. They said to him, it so happened that they did purchase one from among the idolaters in Sidon, and Doma was his name. Rabbi Yehuda says, we watch over her so that no one performs any work with her. They said to him, if so, there is no end to the matter -- behold, she is presumed to be fit. Rabbi Meir says, a heifer whose eyeball is black -- if there is no other heifer similar to her, she is disqualified. If they removed the horns and the hooves, and the marrow was [removed] with them, she is disqualified. If she was born via Caesarean section, she is disqualified, and Rabbi Shimon deems her fit. If she was [purchased] for the hire [of a whore] or the price [of a dog], she is disqualified, and Rabbi Eliezer deems her fit, as it is said (Deut. 23:19), "Do not bring the hire of a whore or the price of a dog into the House of the Lord your God," and this (the red heifer) is not brought into the House.
Tanya RabiBookmarkShareCopy

Tosefta Pesachim

These are the differences between the Passover in Egypt and the Passover of the [ensuing] generations: The Passover in Egypt -- they selected [the Paschal lamb] on the tenth [of Nissan] and slaughtered it on the fourteenth, and they were not liable for excision [for transgressing this commandment]. The Passover of the generations -- they they are liable for excision. The Passover of Egypt -- [sheep or goats with] membranes over the eyes and cataracts were acceptable, and they [could be bought with] the fee [of a whore] or the price [of a dog] (=אתנן ומחיר, see Deut. 23:19), which is not the case with the Passover of the generations. The Passover of Egypt -- as it is said (Ex. 12:4), "[If there are too few in his house for a lamb,] he shall take it along and with his neighbor," which is not the case with the Passover of the generations. Rabbi Shimon says, I say, even in the Passover of the generations, this applies, and all the more so. Why? In order that a person not leave his close neighbor behind [alone] in his house, while he goes and prepares his Paschal lamb at his friend's house, in order to establish what is said (Prov. 27:10), "A close neighbor is better than a faraway brother." The Passover of Egypt -- the blood and fats were not required to go up on the altar, which is not the case with the Passover of the generations. The Passover of Egypt -- it is said of it (Ex. 12:22), "and apply to the lintel and the two doorposts [some of the blood]," which is not the case with the Passover of the generations. The Passover of Egypt -- it is said (ibid.), "and no man shall go out from the entrance of his house until morning," which is not the case with the Passover of the generations. The Passover of Egypt -- each and every one slaughters inside his house. The Passover of the generations -- all Israel slaughters in one place. The Passover of Egypt -- the place of eating [the Paschal lamb] was the same as the place of sleeping. The Passover of the generations -- they may eat it in one place and sleep in another place. [With respect to] both the Passover of Egypt and the Passover of the generations, whoever had male slaves who were not circumcised, or female slaves who had not undergone immersion -- we prevent him (or her) from partaking of the Paschal lamb (see Ex. 12:44). Rabbi Eliezer ben Yaakov says, I say that this verse refers [only] to the Passover of Egypt.
Tanya RabiBookmarkShareCopy