Chasidut su Proverbi 22:31
Kedushat Levi
Levitcus 19,2. “Be holy, etc.!” Vayikra Rabbah 24,9, considering the words: כי קדוש אני, “for I am holy,” asks whether it is possible that the Torah demands that we, the Jewish people, are to be as holy as He is? The Midrash’s answer is that, on the contrary, the words כי קדוש אני, indicate that true sanctity is something reserved for the Creator alone. However holy we can become, His holiness will always be superior to ours.
Earlier commentators have already dealt with the meaning of this verse at length, i.e. the question of how serving the Lord can be performed by means of holiness, and they concluded that this refers to serving the Lord with one’s heart. As to precisely how this is to be done, we have learned in Taanit 2 that prayer is the best means of serving the Lord with one’s heart. The “prayer” meant by the Talmud there is not that we address our requests to the Lord, but that we express our awareness of His greatness and at the same time our inadequacy to express with words what we really feel about Him. By stating that compared to Him we are only dust and ashes, that we are sullied by our sins, and that we accept the yoke of serving Him as our Master, we can begin to gradually develop the level of holiness that it is possible for any of His creatures to attain.
When Solomon in Proverbs 1,5 speaks of ישמע חכם ויוסף לקח, a wise man will hear and (each time) increase his learning, he speaks of how continuous, and even more so, repetitive Torah study will increase our level of spirituality, holiness.
In this connection our author refers to the well known dispute about the proper procedure in lighting the Chanukah candles. (Shabbat 21) The school of Shammai held that we start with eight candles on the first night and progressively light one candle less each evening. The school of Hillel takes the opposite view, ruling that we light only one candle on the first night but increase this by an additional candle each night until on the last night we light eight candles. The school of Hillel explains that the reason why they want to increase the number of lights each night, is although the amount of miracle oil has steadily declined, the appreciation of the miracle increases with each night that we pronounce the blessing when lighting the candles as an act of gratitude for G’d’s miracle at the time. With increasing recognition of the miracle of Chanukah there comes an increased awareness of our relationship to the Creator, or expressed differently, מצוה גוררת מצוה, “the performance of one of G’d’s commandments brings in its wake the desire to fulfill more of His commandments.” Recognition of the greatness of G’d inevitably leads to an awareness of the puniness of man when compared to Him. It is this awareness of our own limitations that gradually brings us closer to understanding and emulating the virtue of the אין סוף, ultimate form of humility. The school of Hillel, disciples of Hillel who was world renowned for his personal modesty and humility, followed their mentor when they formulated the concept of מוסיף והולך, that a spark of holiness feeds upon itself and makes ripples like a pebble thrown on the surface of the water.
This idea is also reflected in the opening words of our portion קדושים תהיו, “commence the process to become holy, as it is continuous and feeds on itself.” An additional factor helping you to progress along this route is כי קדוש אני, “for I am holy,” i.e. when you contemplate My holiness this will inspire you to emulate My holiness to the extent that this is humanly possible. In fact, G’d says that His own holiness will increase proportionate to the amount of holiness to be found amongst His people on earth.
[This is not a surprising statement, as in matters of purity and impurity as well as in matters of holiness and secularity we do not apply objective yardsticks but subjective, relative ones. A good example is to be found in Leviticus 14,36 where despite the fact that according to reason the furnishings in the afflicted house would be ritually impure as the house is impure, the inhabitants are allowed to remove them before the arrival of the priest. Ed.]
One of the most welcome phenomena on earth that G’d looks upon with the greatest pleasure is the virtue of humility. This thought is reflected in Proverbs 22,4 עקב ענוה יראת ה', “the natural result of humility is fear of the Lord; the more people practice humility the greater the holiness of G’d.”
[The virtue of humility is not only great but is most difficult to acquire. First one must possess qualities that are the result of building one’s character; once one does possess these qualities which others boast about, one must go about one’s business as if unaware of possessing such qualities. If Moses had responded to the accusation of his sister Miriam (had he heard them), he would have done so at the expense of his humility. Ed.]
Earlier commentators have already dealt with the meaning of this verse at length, i.e. the question of how serving the Lord can be performed by means of holiness, and they concluded that this refers to serving the Lord with one’s heart. As to precisely how this is to be done, we have learned in Taanit 2 that prayer is the best means of serving the Lord with one’s heart. The “prayer” meant by the Talmud there is not that we address our requests to the Lord, but that we express our awareness of His greatness and at the same time our inadequacy to express with words what we really feel about Him. By stating that compared to Him we are only dust and ashes, that we are sullied by our sins, and that we accept the yoke of serving Him as our Master, we can begin to gradually develop the level of holiness that it is possible for any of His creatures to attain.
When Solomon in Proverbs 1,5 speaks of ישמע חכם ויוסף לקח, a wise man will hear and (each time) increase his learning, he speaks of how continuous, and even more so, repetitive Torah study will increase our level of spirituality, holiness.
In this connection our author refers to the well known dispute about the proper procedure in lighting the Chanukah candles. (Shabbat 21) The school of Shammai held that we start with eight candles on the first night and progressively light one candle less each evening. The school of Hillel takes the opposite view, ruling that we light only one candle on the first night but increase this by an additional candle each night until on the last night we light eight candles. The school of Hillel explains that the reason why they want to increase the number of lights each night, is although the amount of miracle oil has steadily declined, the appreciation of the miracle increases with each night that we pronounce the blessing when lighting the candles as an act of gratitude for G’d’s miracle at the time. With increasing recognition of the miracle of Chanukah there comes an increased awareness of our relationship to the Creator, or expressed differently, מצוה גוררת מצוה, “the performance of one of G’d’s commandments brings in its wake the desire to fulfill more of His commandments.” Recognition of the greatness of G’d inevitably leads to an awareness of the puniness of man when compared to Him. It is this awareness of our own limitations that gradually brings us closer to understanding and emulating the virtue of the אין סוף, ultimate form of humility. The school of Hillel, disciples of Hillel who was world renowned for his personal modesty and humility, followed their mentor when they formulated the concept of מוסיף והולך, that a spark of holiness feeds upon itself and makes ripples like a pebble thrown on the surface of the water.
This idea is also reflected in the opening words of our portion קדושים תהיו, “commence the process to become holy, as it is continuous and feeds on itself.” An additional factor helping you to progress along this route is כי קדוש אני, “for I am holy,” i.e. when you contemplate My holiness this will inspire you to emulate My holiness to the extent that this is humanly possible. In fact, G’d says that His own holiness will increase proportionate to the amount of holiness to be found amongst His people on earth.
[This is not a surprising statement, as in matters of purity and impurity as well as in matters of holiness and secularity we do not apply objective yardsticks but subjective, relative ones. A good example is to be found in Leviticus 14,36 where despite the fact that according to reason the furnishings in the afflicted house would be ritually impure as the house is impure, the inhabitants are allowed to remove them before the arrival of the priest. Ed.]
One of the most welcome phenomena on earth that G’d looks upon with the greatest pleasure is the virtue of humility. This thought is reflected in Proverbs 22,4 עקב ענוה יראת ה', “the natural result of humility is fear of the Lord; the more people practice humility the greater the holiness of G’d.”
[The virtue of humility is not only great but is most difficult to acquire. First one must possess qualities that are the result of building one’s character; once one does possess these qualities which others boast about, one must go about one’s business as if unaware of possessing such qualities. If Moses had responded to the accusation of his sister Miriam (had he heard them), he would have done so at the expense of his humility. Ed.]
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Chovat HaTalmidim
King Solomon said in Proverbs (22, 6): "Teach the lad according to his way, so that also in his old age he will not turn from it." This is the core of education: that not only at the time the child is young and in the domain of his father that he will listen and do according to the commandments, rather also when he grows up and is in his own domain, even when he becomes elderly he will not turn from it. Because education is not only commands, that one should command his son or student "Do such and such," so too is it not just habit, that one accustoms his son or student to good deeds. Education is far, far beyond commands or habit, and these two things, commands and habit, are simply tools used in its implementation which the educator is forced to use, to command or to habituate, in order to educate on the path of the LORD.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Chovat HaTalmidim
As Rashi, may his memory be blessed, explains the word chinukh (education), in the verse (Deuteronomy 20:5), "who built a house but did not dedicate it (chankho) - "Chinukh is a term for beginning." But it is obvious that we would not say, chinukh, about any beginning. For example, when the Gemara (Pesachim 116a) says about the order of the Haggadah, "One begins with disgrace and ends with praise," we would not say, "One is mechanekh with disgrace, etc." And likewise regarding the Sanhedrin (Sanhedrin 32a) - that we begin from the side - we would not say that, we are mechankhin from the side. However in Parashat Lech Lecha (Rashi on Genesis 14:14), Rashi explains it further to us, as follows: Chanikhiv, etc. whom he had trained in the commandments. It is a term for introducing a person or a thing, for the first time, to some particular occupation in which it is intended that he should remain. It has a similar sense in (Proverbs 22:6), "Chanokh the lad," in (Numbers 7:84) "the dedication (chanukat) of the altar" and in (Psalms 30:1) "The dedication (chanukat) of the house."
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Flames of Faith
Nefesh can be felt when a person is fully an empty vessel. It can be felt through the quietistic experience. Silence the external static that we are constantly processing; relax, and humble yourself. Open your heart as an empty vessel to be animated with God’s light, and you might feel a bit of nefesh. Nefesh is the part of the soul that is most directly connected with the body and physical existence.149Innerspace pg.18; Da’as Tefillah pg. 271, Nefesh Ha-Chaim 1:14. The Vilna Gaon in his commentary on Prov. 22:5 writes that the nefesh is the lowest level of Godliness within man and is the “partner of the body.” One merits receiving the holy form of nefesh soon after birth. A Jewish boy will receive his nefesh with his circumcision and a girl when her father names her in the synagogue.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Exodus 19,9.“and they will also have enduring faith in you.” Rashi understands the word: וגם, “and also,” as referring to the people having faith in the prophets in future generations.
I believe, that this conforms to what Nachmanides has written in his commentary on Parshat Mishpatim on Exodus 23,20, commencing with:הנה אנכי שולח מלאך לפניך...ועשית כל אשר דבר אליך, “Here I shall send an angel ahead of you and you shall do all that I will tell you to do,” to tell us that “you must not listen and do what the angel (prophet) tells you unless it conforms to what I tell you,” i.e. you must not listen to prophets when they tell you to violate any of the commandments G’d has revealed in the Torah. The word בך “within you,” are the key to understanding this verse. [The difficulty appears to be also the word לעולם, which normally is understood to mean “forever,” but is a term that cannot be applied in that sense to mortal human beings. Ed.] The Torah hints that if and when future prophets will tell the people what to do and this conforms to what Moses during his lifetime had told them to do, then the people’s faith in such prophets will be not only justified but they are commanded to obey such prophets. Rashi hints at this with the word אחריך, “after you,” which in his commentary is not to be understood as a time frame, i.e. after Moses has died, but as a reference to prophets who would “take after you,” i.e. teach the same Torah without perverting any of it. The Israelites’ duty to have faith in prophets after Moses’ death, is contingent on the loyalty of these prophets to Moses’ Torah.
If we need to look for proof that this interpretation of the word אחריך, is linguistically correct, the Talmud B’rachot 61 refers us to Judges 13,11 וילך מנוח אחרי אשתו, normally translated as “Manoach walked behind his wife,” instead it translates it as “Manoach followed the advice of his wife.” Similarly, here, the Jewish people are to follow that advice of their outstanding leader Moses during all future generations, i.e. לעולם.
Incidentally, we find that in the Zohar the מצות are also referred to as עצות when the author speaks of עיתין דאורייתא, “the Torah’s suggestions.” [I have found עיטין in the Zohar 7 times, only as describing either good or bad advice, never as referring to the Torah. Ed.]
In Maimonides’ hilchot Temurah, near the end, the author the author refers to his having interpreted the word שלישים in Exodus 14,7, normally translated as “captains” to refer to advisors, experts, men who recognize the truth, מועצות. Prophets who do not hand down to their people their true tradition and urge them to abandon some of the laws of the Torah could certainly not qualify for the term “prophet.”
What we have written answers the question asked by many how a “prophet” who performs a miracle or more than one miracle to legitimize himself in the eyes of the people could have been allowed to do so by G’d? The answer is simple. The Torah commands us not to believe the “prophet” on the basis of any so-called miracles he performs unless he does not suggest that the people do anything that contradicts what is their collective tradition since the time of Moses.
The Torah repeats this theme in greater details in Deuteronomy 13,1-5.
The author proceeds now to explain the word לעולם according to a method of exegesis he calls: דרך חדוד אמת.
The Talmud Yevamot 90 states, and this is accepted as a halachically valid conclusion by Maimonides in his introduction to his monumental work Mishneh Torah in the section entitled yessodey hatorah, “fundamental principles of the Torah,” (chapter 9,2) that if a prophet commands violation of a negative Biblical commandment temporarily, when circumstance demand this, as for instance when the prophet Elijah offered sacrifices on Mount Carmel after repairing a defunct altar in violation of the commandment that the only place where this may be done is in the Temple in Jerusalem, the people are not only permitted to obey his command but are obligated to do so on pain of the death penalty. The same principle does not hold true when said prophet commands, even temporarily, to violate a positive commandment of the Torah. Positive commandments of the Torah are never to be abolished, not even temporarily. This is what G’d had in mind when He had Moses write in the Torah that the people would have faith in Moses as a prophet, לעולם, “forever,” (for want of a better word.).
I believe, that this conforms to what Nachmanides has written in his commentary on Parshat Mishpatim on Exodus 23,20, commencing with:הנה אנכי שולח מלאך לפניך...ועשית כל אשר דבר אליך, “Here I shall send an angel ahead of you and you shall do all that I will tell you to do,” to tell us that “you must not listen and do what the angel (prophet) tells you unless it conforms to what I tell you,” i.e. you must not listen to prophets when they tell you to violate any of the commandments G’d has revealed in the Torah. The word בך “within you,” are the key to understanding this verse. [The difficulty appears to be also the word לעולם, which normally is understood to mean “forever,” but is a term that cannot be applied in that sense to mortal human beings. Ed.] The Torah hints that if and when future prophets will tell the people what to do and this conforms to what Moses during his lifetime had told them to do, then the people’s faith in such prophets will be not only justified but they are commanded to obey such prophets. Rashi hints at this with the word אחריך, “after you,” which in his commentary is not to be understood as a time frame, i.e. after Moses has died, but as a reference to prophets who would “take after you,” i.e. teach the same Torah without perverting any of it. The Israelites’ duty to have faith in prophets after Moses’ death, is contingent on the loyalty of these prophets to Moses’ Torah.
If we need to look for proof that this interpretation of the word אחריך, is linguistically correct, the Talmud B’rachot 61 refers us to Judges 13,11 וילך מנוח אחרי אשתו, normally translated as “Manoach walked behind his wife,” instead it translates it as “Manoach followed the advice of his wife.” Similarly, here, the Jewish people are to follow that advice of their outstanding leader Moses during all future generations, i.e. לעולם.
Incidentally, we find that in the Zohar the מצות are also referred to as עצות when the author speaks of עיתין דאורייתא, “the Torah’s suggestions.” [I have found עיטין in the Zohar 7 times, only as describing either good or bad advice, never as referring to the Torah. Ed.]
In Maimonides’ hilchot Temurah, near the end, the author the author refers to his having interpreted the word שלישים in Exodus 14,7, normally translated as “captains” to refer to advisors, experts, men who recognize the truth, מועצות. Prophets who do not hand down to their people their true tradition and urge them to abandon some of the laws of the Torah could certainly not qualify for the term “prophet.”
What we have written answers the question asked by many how a “prophet” who performs a miracle or more than one miracle to legitimize himself in the eyes of the people could have been allowed to do so by G’d? The answer is simple. The Torah commands us not to believe the “prophet” on the basis of any so-called miracles he performs unless he does not suggest that the people do anything that contradicts what is their collective tradition since the time of Moses.
The Torah repeats this theme in greater details in Deuteronomy 13,1-5.
The author proceeds now to explain the word לעולם according to a method of exegesis he calls: דרך חדוד אמת.
The Talmud Yevamot 90 states, and this is accepted as a halachically valid conclusion by Maimonides in his introduction to his monumental work Mishneh Torah in the section entitled yessodey hatorah, “fundamental principles of the Torah,” (chapter 9,2) that if a prophet commands violation of a negative Biblical commandment temporarily, when circumstance demand this, as for instance when the prophet Elijah offered sacrifices on Mount Carmel after repairing a defunct altar in violation of the commandment that the only place where this may be done is in the Temple in Jerusalem, the people are not only permitted to obey his command but are obligated to do so on pain of the death penalty. The same principle does not hold true when said prophet commands, even temporarily, to violate a positive commandment of the Torah. Positive commandments of the Torah are never to be abolished, not even temporarily. This is what G’d had in mind when He had Moses write in the Torah that the people would have faith in Moses as a prophet, לעולם, “forever,” (for want of a better word.).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
[At this point, some editions of the Kedushat Levi contain an additional lengthy paragraph dealing with what Moses had in mind when he told the people that G’d’s demands on them were minimal, i.e. ועתה מה ה' אלוקיכם שואל ממכם in 10,12.
The gist of that paragraph is that the author, instead of as is customary distinguishing between two levels of יראת ה', “fear of the Lord,” viewing the lower level of that as fear of punishment for sins committed, whereas the loftier level being a recognition and feeling overwhelmed by the greatness of G’d, does not consider fear of punishment as even a “low” level of יראת ה'. As this editor has not attained the author’s level of comprehending such concepts sufficiently, I have not dared to try to translate his words into English. Ed.]
The gist of that paragraph is that the author, instead of as is customary distinguishing between two levels of יראת ה', “fear of the Lord,” viewing the lower level of that as fear of punishment for sins committed, whereas the loftier level being a recognition and feeling overwhelmed by the greatness of G’d, does not consider fear of punishment as even a “low” level of יראת ה'. As this editor has not attained the author’s level of comprehending such concepts sufficiently, I have not dared to try to translate his words into English. Ed.]
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy