Bibbia Ebraica
Bibbia Ebraica

Chasidut su Salmi 145:19

רְצוֹן־יְרֵאָ֥יו יַעֲשֶׂ֑ה וְֽאֶת־שַׁוְעָתָ֥ם יִ֝שְׁמַ֗ע וְיוֹשִׁיעֵֽם׃

Realizzerà il desiderio di coloro che Lo temono; Sentirà anche il loro grido e li salverà.

Kedushat Levi

Having said all this, we are faced with the question why ‎according to Rashi, (Genesis 7,7) Noach was of a category ‎described by our sages as ‎קטני אמונה‎, “lacking in adequate faith.” ‎How could a man be described as perfectly righteous, ‎צדיק תמים‎, ‎and at the same time display a lack of faith in the Lord? Another ‎question we must ask is why Noach, if he did not feel that ‎rebuking his peers would help, did not at least pray for his fellow ‎human beings prior to the deluge?‎
We must refer once more to the distinction between the two ‎categories of righteous people. One category has earned the title ‎‎“tzaddik” because he serves only the one and only true G’d, the ‎Creator, and believes that this Creator is all powerful and guides ‎the universe in accordance with His wishes.
Noach, though aware of the many sexual perversions ‎practiced by the people around him, and being steadfast in not ‎copying their behaviour, is attested to by the Torah describing ‎him as ‎תמים היה בדורותיו‎, “he was perfect in his time.” ‎Nonetheless, his loyalty to the Creator certainly did not endear ‎him to his peers, hence “he walked with G’d”, as there was no one ‎else “with whom to walk.” Sadly, only G’d appreciated his self-‎restraint, his righteousness.‎
Having said all this, we are faced with the question why ‎according to Rashi, (Genesis 7,7) Noach was of a category ‎described by our sages as ‎קטני אמונה‎, “lacking in adequate faith.” ‎How could a man be described as perfectly righteous, ‎צדיק תמים‎, ‎and at the same time display a lack of faith in the Lord? Another ‎question we must ask is why Noach, if he did not feel that ‎rebuking his peers would help, did not at least pray for his fellow ‎human beings prior to the deluge?‎
We must refer once more to the distinction between the two ‎categories of righteous people. One category has earned the title ‎‎“tzaddik” because he serves only the one and only true G’d, ‎the Creator, and believes that this Creator is all powerful and ‎guides the universe in accordance with His wishes.
Rabbi Shmuel bar Nachmeni in Moed Katan 16 commenting ‎on Samuel II 23,1 where the prophet introduces King David’s last ‎utterances, (actually a “hymn,”) with the words: ‎נאום דוד בן ישי ‏ונאום הגבר הוקם על‎, ”words of David son of Yishai, and of the ‎strong man who has been elevated and anointed by G’d, etc.” He ‎continues there in verse 3: ‎אמר אלוקי ישראל לי דבר צור ישראל מושל ‏באדם צדיק מושל יראת אלוקים‎, “Israel’s G’d said concerning me: ‘be ‎ruler over mankind, be ruler over awe of G’d.’” According to Rabbi ‎Shmuel bar Nachmeni, the somewhat enigmatic verse must be ‎understood as follows: David, who had raised high the banner of ‎repentance (when he said to the prophet Natan in response to his ‎rebuke that he had been guilty of without ifs or buts in the ‎matter of Bat Sheva) “G’d rules man, whereas the righteous rules ‎G’d.” What is meant by “the righteous rules G’d?” Initially G’d ‎decrees what man’s fate will be; however, the intercession of a ‎‎tzaddik’s prayer” may result in G’d’s decree being cancelled.” ‎The Talmud suggests that when a tzaddik is not only ‎concerned with his own salvation but endeavours to bring sinners ‎closer to G’d, his prayer can influence G’d to the extent that He ‎will cancel a decree of death already promulgated in heaven ‎against certain individuals or groups of people. Noach, alas, did ‎not engage in active attempts to influence people by rebuking ‎them.
‎[No doubt, whenever Noach was asked during the 120 years ‎that he built the ark why he did so, he told his peers that G’d had ‎instructed him to do this in order to escape the deluge that would ‎occur. Ed.]‎
One of the reasons that he did not pray for his fellow man ‎may have been that he felt inadequate to be able to cancel a ‎decree that G’d had told him He had issued. He may have been ‎motivated by considerations we encounter in connection with ‎Neuchadnezzar (Sanhedrin 92). We are told there that when ‎throwing Chananyah, Michael and Azaryah into a fiery furnace ‎from which all three were saved, G’d also commanded Ezekiel to ‎revive the dead bones of the Jews that had been killed by ‎Nevuchadnezzar when he destroyed Jerusalem and burned the ‎Temple. One of the newly revived was instructed to touch ‎Nevuchadnezzar on his forehead and to identify himself as one of ‎the many thousands who had been resurrected. Nevuchadnezzar ‎was so impressed that he began to compose songs of praise ‎extolling the Almighty. Thereupon an angel shut ‎Nevuchadnezzar’s mouth to prevent him from continuing. Had ‎the angel not done so, all the hymns composed by King David ‎would have lost in value when compared to the songs composed ‎by Nevuchadnezzar.
The word used by the Talmud to describe what would have ‎occurred is ‎לגנות‎, “to denigrate, or defame.” When reminding ‎ourselves of the tzaddik’s ability, under certain conditions ‎to reverse a decree that originated from the Attribute of Justice, ‎and to cause it to become a beneficial decree, we can understand ‎why Nevuchadnezzar had begun to sing the Lord’s praises; [after ‎all he had deliberately destroyed G’d’s Temple on earth. Ed.] When ‎he noticed that Ezekiel’s prayers had resulted in an army of ‎people being resurrected, he became afraid that another prayer ‎by the same person, or persons like him, would result in his life’s ‎work, the destruction of the Temple, being reversed also. In order ‎to pre-empt any prayer by any tzaddik being able to achieve ‎this, he tried to pre-empt anyone from offering such a prayer and ‎being granted his request, by extolling G’d’s greatness in even ‎more glowing terms than David had done in the Book of Psalms.‎
Noach, far from being a boastful individual, proclaiming ‎himself as a major deity, was the very opposite, a humble person, ‎to whom it would not have occurred that a prayer of his would ‎influence G’d to reverse a decree which He had certainly not ‎arrived at without first having agonized over it. [He even told ‎Noach that He would delay execution of this decree for up to 120 ‎years, this is why He told Noach when he was 480 years old to ‎start building the ark. Ed.] It was because he did not consider ‎himself as especially righteous, that he reasoned that just as he ‎would be saved, so there must be numerous other people of ‎similar stature who would also be saved. When G’d noticed this, ‎He told Noach (Genesis 6,13) that He would have to proceed with ‎His intention to destroy the human race as there was no one who ‎had tried to intercede on their behalf. Nonetheless, He made plain ‎to Noach, that although he had not interceded on behalf of his ‎fellow humans, He would maintain the existing covenant between ‎G’d and mankind through Noach and his family. (Genesis 6,18).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Kedushat Levi

Another way of understanding the words ‎ונתתם חמשית לפרעה‎, ‎‎“if you give one fifth to Pharaoh,” is based on the well known ‎interpretation of psalms 145,19 by my sainted teacher Rabbi Dov ‎Baer. On the words: ‎רצון יראיו יעשה‎, “He fulfills the wishes of those ‎who fear Him,” my teacher explained that the subject here is first ‎and foremost G’d. He does things for the tzaddikim that ‎they appreciate, (‎רצון‎) so that they in turn are encouraged to ‎request further favours from Him. When G’d feels that the time is ‎appropriate for Him to shower His people with His largesse, He ‎first gives some indication to those who fear Him that He is well ‎disposed to His people at that time. This will trigger the ‎appropriate prayers requesting G’d’s largesse. Bearing this in ‎mind, we are dealing here with two separate aspects, ‎בחינות‎, of ‎how G’d deals with His creatures. 1) An initiative by G’d; 2) a ‎response by G’d to an initiative by His people. This is hinted at by ‎the Talmud in Yevamot 34 where it is stated that a woman ‎does not become pregnant from the first time she has marital ‎relations with her husband as the Hebrew word ‎ביאה‎ for such ‎relations is derived from ‎התחברות‎, a mutual joining together. The ‎Jewish people, by definition are similar to the wife, i.e. they are at ‎the receiving end, do not initiate. In their relations to G’d, the ‎Jewish people is similarly always perceived as female, i.e. as a ‎כלה‎, ‎bride, or similarly in the parlance of our prophets, a “wife”. G’d’s ‎שפע‎, “largesse,” is similarly perceived as female, seeing that it is a ‎gift, something received. When G’d is desirous of canceling an ‎unwelcome decree, He must be placed in the position of ‎responding to an appropriate request originating from the ‎victims. He cannot do more than allude to this by a hint, else He ‎will be perceived as initiating rather than responding. As an ‎example of G’d “hinting” that He wished a tzaddik to ‎intervene on behalf of the Jewish people by prayer, the author ‎quotes Exodus 32,10 when immediately after informing Moses ‎that the people had made a golden calf and had worshipped it, G’d ‎says to Moses: ‎ועתה הניחה לי ויחר אפי בהם ואכלם ואעשה אותך לגוי גדול‎ ‎‎“and now, Leave Me be, so that I can get angry and destroy them ‎and make you into a great nation.” According to Rashi this ‎whole line was a broad hint to Moses to intervene on behalf of the ‎people by praying for their survival. We find this same ‎interpretation of that verse (earlier) in Midrash Tanchuma as ‎well as in Targum Yonatan ben Uzziel.‎
The two ‎בחינות‎ of the G’d-Israel, or Israel-G’d relationship we ‎have mentioned on page 239, are known respectively as the ‎יראה‎ ‎or ‎אהבה‎ relationship. Each of these relationships consists of two ‎elements. We have explained earlier that the largesse when it ‎comes also comes in two different ways, depending on whether ‎the recipients are the gentiles or the Jewish people. When it is ‎granted to the gentiles it is immediately recognizable as such, ‎whereas when it is bestowed on the Jewish people it is not always ‎recognisable as such immediately. When Joseph speaks of ‎ארבע ‏הידות‎ [instead of ‎ידות‎ without the letter ‎ה‎ alluding to G’d. Ed.] he ‎alludes to these four different manifestations of G’d’s largesse. ‎The word ‎לאכלכם‎ in the same verse (page 239,23) is an alternate ‎for the word ‎לטובה‎, i.e. beneficially. ‎
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Versetto precedenteCapitolo completoVersetto successivo