Commento su Ecclesiaste 7:7

For quarreling makes the wise foolish. When the fool provokes the wise person, he confuses his thoughts, and he too, stumbles. Dasan and Aviram taunted Moshe, by saying, “may Adonoy look down upon you and judge, etc.,”¹⁹Shemos 5:21. and they confused him and caused his wisdom to depart and to speak in anger²⁰A wise person should distance himself from being involved in discussion with fools because it will cause his own wisdom to suffer. (Metsudas Dovid) against the Holy One, Blessed Is He, and he said, “and You did not save Your people,”²¹Ibid. Verse 23. and he was punished for this matter, when He replied to him, “now you will see,”²²Ibid. 6:1. but you will not see the war of the thirty-one kings.

“For exploitation disconcerts a wise man, and destroys the gift of understanding” (Ecclesiastes 7:7).
“For exploitation [haoshek] disconcerts a wise man” – disputes [esek] in which Torah scholars are engaged, with each other, “disconcerts a wise man” – it confuses one’s wisdom.
“And destroys the gift of understanding” – Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said: I learned eighty halakhot from Yehuda Ben Pedaya regarding the plowing of a grave, but because I was engaged [asuk] in the needs of the masses, I forgot them. Who is a Torah scholar? Rabbi Abbahu [said] in the name of Rabbi Yoḥanan: Anyone who cancels his engagements for the sake of his studies. It is taught: Anyone whom, when they ask him about a halakha from his studies, he provides an answer.

And a gift [corrupts] the heart. The heart of wisdom, which is a gift to man,²³I.e., the provocation by the wicked, causes the wise to forfeit their wisdom, which is God‘s gift to man. as it is stated, “For Adonoy gives wisdom.”²⁴Mishlei 2:6.

Rabbi Yoḥanan ben Zakkai had five disciples.⁴⁵They are listed in Avot (2:8): Rabbi Eliezer ben Horkanos, Rabbi Yehoshua ben Ḥananya, Rabbi Yosei HaKohen, Rabbi Shimon ben Netanel ,and Rabbi Elazar ben Arakh. As long as he was alive, they would sit before him. When he died, they went to Yavne, but Rabbi Elazar ben Arakh went to his wife in Emmaus, a place with good water and a beautiful view. He waited for them to come to him, but they did not come. When they did not come, he sought to go to them, but his wife did not allow him to do so. She said: ‘Who is in need of whom?’ He said to her: ‘They are in need of me.’ She said to him: ‘A leather container [of food] and mice, which typically goes to which; the mice to the container, or the container to the mice?’ He heeded her and remained until he forgot his learning. Sometime later they came to him and asked him: ‘A wheat loaf or a barley loaf, which can be eaten faster with a relish?’⁴⁶The garments of one who enters a leprous house become ritually impure only if he remains in the house long enough to recline and eat half a loaf of wheat bread, not barley bread, with a relish. They asked Rabbi Elazar ben Arakh: When the Sages clarified that this halakha is determined by the time it takes to eat wheat bread, is that a leniency because it takes longer to eat wheat bread than it takes to eat barley bread, or is it a stringency because it takes less time to eat wheat bread than barley bread? He did not know how to respond to them, or the meaning of “with relish [liftan].” Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Yosei say: It is two food items joined [lefutin] together.⁴⁷When one eats bread with another food, the food accompanying the bread is referred to as liftan.
Rabbi [Yehuda HaNasi] would appoint two appointees each year.⁴⁸One served as head of the yeshiva and one as president of the court (Matnot Kehuna). If they were worthy, they would endure; if not, they would die. As Rabbi’s death neared, he said to his son: ‘Do not do so, but rather, appoint them all at once,⁴⁹Appoint the two new appointees, as well as the order of who will take over for them upon their passing (Matnot Kehuna). and appoint Rabbi Ḥanina as leader [of them all].’ Why had [Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi himself] not appointed him? Rabbi Yosei bar Zevid said: It is because the residents of Tzippori denounced him. Did [Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi decide how to] act based on their denunciations? They denounce many in this way; if we heed them in his regard, we must heed them regarding others as well. Rabbi Bon said:⁵⁰Some commentaries add detail that appears to be missing from the midrash here, but is mentioned in the Jerusalem Talmud (Ta’anit 4:2): Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi was delivering a public lecture and cited a verse in Ezekiel (7:15), and Rabbi Ḥanina corrected his pronunciation of the Hebrew word homot, which Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi had pronounced homiyot. This caused public embarrassment to Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi (Matnot Kehuna). [Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi] said to [Rabbi Ḥanina]: ‘Before whom did you learn that reading?’ He said to him: ‘Before Rav Hamnuna, the Bible expert of Babylon.’ He said to him: ‘When you go there, tell him that I appointed you to serve as an elder.’ [Rabbi Ḥanina] knew that he would not be appointed in [Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi’s] days. When [Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi] died, his son sought to appoint [Rabbi Ḥanina], but he did not accept it upon himself. He said: ‘I do not accept, but rather defer to Rabbi Afes of the south.’ There was one elder there who said: ‘If Rabbi Ḥanina is first, I am second. If Rabbi Afes is first, I am second.’ Rabbi Ḥanina accepted upon himself to be appointed third, and he was privileged to live a very long life. He said: ‘I do not know why I was privileged to live a very long life, whether it was because of this matter,⁵¹That I deferred to Rabbi Afes and to the other elder. or whether it was because when I would ascend from Tiberias to Tzippori I would take a detour to visit Rabbi Shimon ben Ḥalafta. I do not know which of these two [is the reason.]’
Another matter: “For exploitation disconcerts a wise man” – the exploitation of Datan and Aviram, exploiting Moses their master, caused his wisdom to be lost from him. “And destroys the gift of [matana] understanding” – [the word matana] is written [in such a way that it can also be vocalized] metuna, patience. Had Moses been patient, he would have been spared. However, because they provoked him and caused him to become upset, and they said to him: “May the Lord look upon you [and judge, for you have made us loathsome in the eyes of Pharaoh]” (Exodus 5:21), he could not tolerate it, and, as a result, he became upset in his anger and said [to God]: “Since I came [to Pharaoh to speak in Your name…You have not rescued Your people]” (Exodus 5:23). The Holy One blessed be He said to him: ‘I wrote about you that you are wise, and you become upset and say this to me? By your life, you should know and inform others that the ultimate fate of My children will be better than the beginning that I provided them in Egypt,’ as it is written: “Now you will see [what I will do to Pharaoh, as with a strong hand he will send them out, and with a strong hand he will drive them from his land]” (Exodus 5:24). At that moment, the Holy One blessed be He said: ‘Woe for those who are lost and cannot be found. I lost Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, who never doubted Me, and I have not found anyone who is their equal.’ At that moment, the attribute of justice sought to harm [Moses], as it is stated: “God [Elohim] spoke [to Moses]” (Exodus 6:2), and Elohim [indicates] nothing other than the attribute of justice. And it is stated: “And He said to him: I am the Lord” (Exodus 6:2).⁵²This second half of the verse refers to God as the Lord [Y-H-V-H], which indicates the attribute of mercy. This indicates that after considering harming Moses, God acted mercifully toward him. He said to [Moses]: ‘You are flesh and blood and unable to bear them.⁵³You are unable to bear their suffering, and that is why you criticized Me. I am the Lord, merciful, the Master of mercy, with My attributes, I will have mercy,’ as it is stated: “I have made and I will bear” (Isaiah 46:4).

Quarreling. An expression of conflict and provocation. There are other interpretations, but they separate the verses one from the other, but “כִּי” [=for] which is stated at the beginning of the verse proves that it is connected to the preceding verse.