Midrash su Amos 8:78

“There was a famine in the land.” Ten famines came to the world. One during the days of Adam; one during the days of Lemekh; one during the days of Abraham; one during the days of Isaac; one during the days of Jacob; one during the days of Elijah; one during the days of Elisha; one during the days of David; one during the days when the judges judged; and one that is yet progressing and coming to the world.
One during the days of Adam, as it is stated: “Accursed is the ground because of you” (Genesis 3:17); one during the days of Lemekh, as it is stated: “From the ground that the Lord had cursed” (Genesis 5:29); one during the days of Abraham, as it is stated: “There was famine in the land and Abram descended to Egypt” (Genesis 12:10); one during the days of Isaac: “There was a famine in the land, beside the first famine” (Genesis 26:1); one during the days of Jacob, as it is stated: “For these two years there has been famine in the land” (Genesis 45:6); one during the days of Elijah, as it is stated: “There will not be dew or rain these years, except by my word” (I Kings 17:1); one during the days of Elisha, as it is stated: “There was a great famine in Samaria” (II Kings 6:25); one during the days of David, as it is stated: “There was a famine during the days of David, three years” (II Samuel 21:1); one during the days when the judges judged, as it is stated: “There was a famine in the land” (Ruth 1:1); and one that is advancing upon the world, as it is written: “I will send famine in the land, not famine for bread, not thirst for water” (Amos 8:11).
Rabbi Huna in the name of Rabbi Shmuel: It would have been appropriate for the main manifestation of them³⁹The years of famine during the days of David. to have been during the days of Saul, and it was not appropriate for them to have been during the days of David. [But] because Saul was an offshoot of a sycamore tree,⁴⁰The sycamore tree is frail. and would have been unable to withstand it, the Holy One blessed be He transferred it and brought it to David, who is the offshoot of an olive tree⁴¹The olive tree is sturdy. and [he] was able to withstand it. A parable says: Shila sinned and Yoḥana⁴²Generic names of that period. pays for it? So, all of them did not come upon lowly people, but rather upon mighty people who could withstand them. Rabbi Ḥiyya in the name of Rabbi Shimon ben Elazar: [It is analogous] to a glazier who had a basket filled with cups of cut glass. When he sought to hang his basket, he would bring a peg, hammer it [into the wall,] and then hang his basket. So, all of them did not come upon lowly people, but rather to mighty people. Rabbi Berekhya would read in reference to them:⁴³David’s generation. “He gives strength to the weary” (Isaiah 40:29).
Rabbi Berekhya in the name of Rabbi Ḥelbo: Two [famines]⁴⁴That of Lemekh occurred while Adam was still alive. came during the days of Adam.⁴⁵In the parallel text of this midrash found in Bereishit Rabba 25:3 it says ‘Abraham’ instead of ‘Adam.’ Rav Huna in the name of Rav Aḥa: One was during the days of Abraham, and one was during the days of Lemekh. The famine that was during the days of Elijah was due to a drought. One year it produced [a harvest] and the other year it did not produce. But the famine during the days of Elisha was due to [economic] panic, as it is stated: “Until a donkey’s head was sold for eighty of silver” (II Kings 6:25). [Regarding] the famine that came during the days that the judges judged, Rabbi Huna in the name of Rabbi Dosa: They were forty-two se’a⁴⁶A measure of dry volume roughly equivalent to 8 liters. and they became forty-one se’a.⁴⁷The reference is to the amount of produce that could be purchased for one sela. Some commentators suggest that the text should be read: they were [sold] at a rate of two se’a [per sela] and became one se’a [per sela]. See Etz Yosef. But is it not taught: A person may not depart to outside the Land of Israel until two se’a⁴⁸Of wheat. are bought for a shekel?⁴⁹The reference is to the biblical shekel, which is the equivalent of the rabbinic sela. Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel said: When is that so? It is when one cannot find anything [else] to buy. But if he can find [other food] to buy, even [at] one se’a for a shekel, a Jew may not leave the Land of Israel.⁵⁰Elimelekh was punished because his decision to leave the Land of Israel was not justified. But is it not taught: During a time of pestilence, a time of war, gather everyone inside, but during a time of famine, scatter? Why was Elimelekh punished? It is because he sank the hearts of Israel.
[It is analogous] to a prominent person who lived in a province, and the residents of the province would depend upon him, and would say that if drought years would come, he could provide food for the province for ten years. When a drought year came, his maidservant went out, and went into the market with her basket in her hand. The residents of the province said: This is the one who we relied upon, that if there would be a drought he could support us for ten years? His maidservant is standing in the market with her basket in her hand! So, Elimelekh was one of the prominent residents of the province, and one of the leaders of the generation. When the years of famine arrived, he said: ‘Now, all Israel will come around to my door, this one with his basket and that one with his basket.’ He arose and fled from them; that is what is written: “A man of Bethlehem of Judah went.”

Rabbi Elazar bar Avina in the name of Rabbi Aḥa and the Rabbis. Rabbi Elazar said [in the name of Rabbi Aḥa]: “He spoke three thousand proverbs” regarding each and every matter. “His songs were one thousand and five”—one thousand and five reasons for each and every matter. The Rabbis say: “He spoke three thousand proverbs” on each and every verse. “His songs were one thousand and five”—one thousand and five reasons for each and every proverb. “His proverbs were” is not written here, but rather, “his songs were one thousand and five”—the song of the proverb, the reason for the matter, [and another] reason for the matter.
Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman said: We reviewed the entire book of Proverbs and we found written in it only nine hundred and fifteen verses, and you say three thousand proverbs? Rather, you do not have any verse that does not have two or three thoughts, like: “A nose ring of gold and an adornment of fine gold” (Proverbs 25:12), “a nose ring of gold in the snout of a pig” (Proverbs 11:22). ⁴⁹The first verse equates “a nose ring of gold and an adornment of fine gold.” The second verse mentions only the nose ring of gold, but it also applies to an adornment of fine gold. “Do not glorify yourself before a king, and do not stand in the place of the great” (Proverbs 25:6). It goes without saying do not sit; do not sit, and it goes without saying, do not speak.⁵⁰By teaching that one should not stand in the place of the great, by corollary Solomon is also teaching that one should not sit in their place, and that one should not speak there.
We learned:⁵¹Mishna Yadayim 3:5. Rabbi Akiva said: God forbid, not even one person in Israel disagreed regarding Song of Songs, claiming that it does not impurify the hands,⁵²There is a rabbinic decree that any sacred scroll renders teruma or one’s hands impure. (This decree was enacted so that people would not store their teruma with those scrolls; that could result in vermin attracted by the teruma gnawing at the scrolls and causing them damage.) Thus, if one were to hold that a scroll of the Song of Songs does not render one’s hands impure, that would mean it is not part of the Bible. as there is no day in the entire history of the world like the day that Song of Songs was given. Why? It is because all the Writings are holy, and this is the holy of holies. Regarding what did they disagree? It is regarding Ecclesiastes. Rabbi Yoḥanan bar Rabbi Yehoshua son of Rabbi Akiva’s father-in-law said in accordance with the statement of ben Azai: So they disagreed, so they concluded.⁵³There was a dispute regarding both Song of Songs and Ecclesiastes, but the conclusion was that both are part of the Bible and therefore render one’s hands impure.
Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya stated a parable for it. [It is comparable] to one who took a se’a of wheat to the baker [and] said to him: ‘Produce for me from it flour, fine flour.⁵⁴Grind the wheat into flour, and then sift it repeatedly to produce fine flour. Produce for me from it one loaf, from the fine flour, [produced from] the flour.’ So, of all of Solomon’s wisdom, only Song of Songs is fine flour for Israel. Song of Songs, the best of songs, the finest of songs, the most excellent of songs; we will recite songs to the One who has made us into a song in the world, just as you say: “Wail, songs of the palace” (Amos 8:3); the praises of the Temple.⁵⁵The verse addresses songs as if they are people, alluding to the fact that the people of Israel are like a song in that they represent the glory of God.
Another matter, Song of Songs, the best of songs, the finest of songs, the most excellent of songs; we will recite songs [shirim] to the One who rendered us the remnants [shiyurim] of the world, just as it is stated: “The Lord alone will lead him” (Deuteronomy 32:12).⁵⁶The verse is expounded to mean that the Lord will lead him alone, meaning that the people of Israel will remain alone in tranquility at the end of days. Rabbi Yoḥanan [said] in the name of Rabbi Aḥa in the name of Rabbi Shimon bar Abba: We will recite songs and praise to the One who is destined to rest the Divine Spirit upon us. We will recite many songs before Him.
In all the songs, either He lauds them, or they laud Him. In the song of Moses, they laud Him and say: “This is my Lord and I will glorify Him” (Exodus 15:2). And in the song of Moses, He lauds them: “He would mount him on the elevations of the earth” (Deuteronomy 32:13). However, here, they laud Him and He lauds them. He lauds them, “Behold, you are fair, my love” (Song of Songs 1:15) and they laud Him: “Behold you are fair my beloved, pleasant, too” (Song of Songs 1:16).
Rabbi Shimon in the name of Rabbi Ḥanin of Tzippori said, it is a double song.⁵⁷God and Israel praise each other. Rabbi Simon said: Doubled and redoubled.⁵⁸In many verses, the praise is doubled even from the perspective of one speaker, such as: “Behold, you are fair, my love, behold, you are fair” (1:15).
Rabbi Levi said: The numerical value of shir corresponds to the years of the patriarchs and the Ten Commandments.⁵⁹Song of Songs is a tribute to Israel, as implied by the fact that the numerical value of the word shir, song, corresponds to the number of years of the lives of the patriarchs, plus the Ten Commandments given to Israel at Sinai. Shir is five hundred and ten.⁶⁰Shin 300, yod 10, reish 200, equal 510. If you say that there is a surplus in them,⁶¹Abraham lived 175 years, Isaac, 180, and Jacob, 147, plus 10 commandments, equal 512, not 510. deduct from them the years of famine⁶²One year during the lifetime of Abraham, and one year during the lifetime of Isaac. that are not included in the tally.
Another matter, Rabbi Yudan and Rabbi Levi in the name of Rabbi Yoḥanan [said]: Every place that “King Solomon” is mentioned in this scroll, the verse is speaking of King Solomon. [Whenever it says] simply “the king,” the verse is speaking of the Holy One blessed be He. The Rabbis say: Every place that “King Solomon” [Shelomo] is mentioned in this scroll, the verse is speaking of the King, [of Whom it may be said that] peace is His. [Whenever it says] simply “the king,” the verse is speaking of the congregation of Israel.

And, behold, there came up out of the river seven kine … and it came to pass in the morning that his spirit was troubled (Gen. 41:2–8). In this verse the word “troubled” is written vatipa’em, and in the verse relating to Nebuchadnezzar, And Nebuchadnezzar was troubled (Dan. 2:1), it is written vattitpa’em. Pharaoh recalled his dream, but did not know its explanation, and therefore was troubled only once. Nebuchadnezzar, however, forgot the dream and its explanation, and therefore was troubled twice.²The use of the hithpael form of the word “troubled” in the quotation about Nebuchadnezzar contains a doubled tav, thus indicating two troubles, while the niphal form in the verse about Pharaoh contains one tav, signifying one trouble. That is why it is written about Him: Nebuchadnezzar dreamed dreams (ibid.). R. Yannai said: He actually had two dreams; one related to an image and the other to a tree. Then the king commanded to call the magicians, and the astrologers, and the sorcerers (ibid., v. 2). Written without the tav, the magicians are those who inquire of the bones of the dead; the astrologers are those who examine the planetary constellations (for their answer). This is so because the root of the word asafim (astrologers”) means “to compel,” as it is said: Hear this, O ye that would oppress the needy (hashe’afim) (Amos 8:4); and the sorcerers are those who diminish the power of the heavenly and earthly courts.

When Rabba b. R. Huna and R. Hamnuna died [in Babylon] their bodies were carried to Palestine. (Ib. b) At the arrival of a narrow bridge [where two could not pass at once] both camels that were carrying the coffins remained standing. An Ishmaelitic merchant, who was present, happened to see this and in surprise asked the reason for the camels' stopping. He was told that each of the deceased Rabbis wished to give the other the right of way. "If I were to give my view of the matter," the Arab said, "I should decide in favor of the one who is himself great and the son of a great man." The Arab had hardly concluded his remarks when the camel bearing Rabba b. R. Huna passed over the bridge. At that instant the molars and the front teeth of the Arab fell out. A young disciple declaimed the following eulogy. "A learned scion of an ancient race Upward to Sacred Palestina draws, And bears unto illimitable space The code of battles, the great Book of Laws. The cormorant and hedgehog nightly gloat Upon destruction spreading far and wide; For God His wrath upon the earth has hurled, And from our midst recall our pious learned. The omnipotent delights when from the sinful world An innocent bright soul has Home returned." When R. Abina died, the funeral orator held the following oration: "Bend, ye majestic palms, in grief sincere. O'er one who, like a palm had flourished here; Nor cease your mourning when the moon's soft ray Change to shadowy night the brilliant day. For noon's broad glare had oft to midnight waned, Ere slumber o'er his studious eyelids reigned." R. Ashi said to Bar Kipuk [the funeral orator]: "What oration will you make on the day of my death?" And he answered him the following: "How can the lowly hyssop still survive, When with devouring flames the cedars strive? When Leviathan be the angler's prey, What have the fishes of the pond to say? If in deep torrents dry the fisher's hook, How fares it with the waters of the brook?" Ba'r Abin said to him: "God forbid that net and flame be used in orations over the "Weep for the losers but not for the lost (deceased), for he passed into rest but we into grief." R. Ashi felt discouraged over their expression, and the result was that the orator's feet turned upward so that when R. Ashi died, neither one of the orators was able to come and hold orations. And this is what Rabbi Ashi meant when he said: "Neither bar Abin nor bar Kipuk would be bound to perform the ceremony of Chalitza." When Raba came to the river Tigris, he said to bar Abin: "Pronounce an [appropriate] prayer," and the latter began: "The major part of Israel went through water; remember the covenant and have mercy. We went astray from Thee as a woman goeth astray from her husband; do not cast us off, for it may have the same meaning as that of the bitter-water." R. Chanin, the son-in-law of the Exilarch, had been childless for a long time; he prayed and was answered. On the day of the circumcision, the father died. The funeral orator on this occasion declaimed the following eulogy: "Parental joy was changed to hopeless pain; Where bliss had entered, grief was doomed to reign; For in the moment of his hope fulfilled, The joyful beating of that heart was stilled." The child was named Chanin, after his father. When R. Pedath died, R. Isaac b. Elazar began the eulogy as follows: "This day is as grievous to Israel as the day in which the sun would set at noon; for it is written (Amos 8, 9) And it shall come to pass in that day that I will cause the sun to go down at noon, upon which R. Jochanan said that it refers to the death of the king Josiah." When R. Jochanan died, R. Ami observed the seven days (of mourning). Whereupon R. Aba the son of R. Chiya b. Abba said: "R. Ami did so on his own authority, and it has no precedent; for so said my father in the name of R. Jochanan: 'Even over a teacher of whom one has acquired the greater part of his wisdom, one need not sit in mourning more than one day.' " When R. Zera departed, the funeral orator delivered the following eulogy: "In Babylon this noble sage was born; In Palestine he was adorned and cherished, 'Woe unto me,' doth Redeth sadly mourn, 'For my most precious jewel now has perished.' " When R. Abahu died, the pillars of Kisri shed tears; when R. Jose died, the gutters of Sepphoris were overrun with blood;' when R. Jacob b. Acah died, the stars were seen in the daytime; when R. Assi died, all the trees were rooted up; when R. Samuel b. Isaac and also when R. Chiya died, stones of fire fell from heaven; when R. M'nachem b. R. Simai, all the images became obliterated and as smooth as if passed upon with a roller; when R. Tanchum b. Chiya of the village Aku died, all the impressions upon the images were effaced; when R. Isaac b. Eliashib, seventy burglaries were committed in Taberia; when R. Hamnuna, hailstones fell from heaven; when Rabba and R. Joseph died, the bridge-arches of the Euphrates collapsed; when Abayi and Rabba, the bridge-arches of Tigris collapsed;' when R. Mesharshia died, the trees brought forth thorns [instead of fruit].

(Dan. 2:2:) SO THE KING SAID TO SUMMON THE DIVINERS, THE ENCHANTERS, AND THE SORCERERS. What were the diviners (HRTWMYM)? R. Simon said: (HRTMYM) is written < here > (defectively without the W). These are the ones who consult the bones (TYMY) of the dead. ¹⁴Rashi on Gen. 41:8 has a more ingenuous etymology: “Those who are aroused (rt.: HR[YM]) through the bones (TMY) of the dead (M[TYM]).” THE ENCHANTERS. What are the enchanters ('ShPYM)? These are the ones who push fortune. So this word is nothing but a word of duress. Thus it is stated (in Amos 8:4): HEAR THIS, YOU WHO OPPRESS (Sh'PYM) THE NEEDY. (Dan. 2:2:) AND THE SORCERERS are actually sorcerers.

(Fol. 90b) Our Rabbis were taught: Those who store up fruit for speculation, usurers, fraudulent measurers and food speculators, concerning them, the passage reads (Amos 8, 5) When will the new moon be gone, that we may sell provisions? and that we open the corn warehouses, making the epha (measure) small and increasing the shekel, and cheating with deceitful balances. What is written immediately after this? Sworn hath the Lord by the Excellency of Jacob, surely I will not forfeit to eternity all their deeds. Who are meant by those who store fruit for speculation? R. Jochanan said: "People like Sabbati. The father of Samuel used to buy grain at harvest-time, and sold it at the same price. Samuel, his son, however, used to store up the grain he bought in harvest until the price became higher, and then sold it at the same price as in harvest time." And from Palestine the following message was sent: "The acts of the father are more esteemed than those of his son." Why so? Because when the market becomes low (prices fall) it remains so [for the rest of the year, and this was the ease of Samuel's father].

Job said (in Job 14:4), “Who can produce something clean out of something unclean, no one.” After the Holy One, blessed be He, permitted the cow and forbade the camel, who could declare clean or declare unclean? Who has done so? Is it not the One? Is it not the singular One of the world? Come and see: Originally at the creation of the world, everything was permitted, as stated (in Gen. 9:3), “as with the green grass, I have given you everything.” And it states (in Gen. 1:31), “And God saw everything that He had done, and behold, it was good.” Then after Israel stood by Mount Sinai, He increased Torah and commandments for them in order to give them a good reward. But if so, why did He not so command the first Adam? The Holy One, blessed be He, said, “When I ordained an easy commandment for him, he transgressed against it. How could he fulfill all these commandments? On the very day on which it was commanded, on that day he transgressed against it. He was unable to remain obedient to the command for a single hour. How did the Holy One, blessed be He, create Adam? R. Judah ben Pedayah said, “[Twelve hours make up the day.] In the first hour the first Adam arose in the thought of the Holy One, blessed be He, [with a view] to creation.⁴⁵PRK 23:1; PR 46:2; M. Pss. 92:3; Lev. R. 29:1; cf. Sanh. 38b; ARN, A, 1; PRE 11. In the second He consulted with the ministering angels and said (in Gen. 1:26), ‘Let us make man in our image.’ In the third He gathered his dust. In the fourth He kneaded him. In the fifth He shaped him. In the sixth He stood him up as a golem. In the seventh He blew breath into him. In the eighth He brought him into the Garden of Eden. In the ninth He commanded him, ‘Eat of this, and do not eat of that.’ In the tenth [Adam] sinned. In the eleventh he was judged. In the twelfth he was expelled.” Thus you must conclude that he did not remain obedient to the commandment for even a single hour. R. Judah ben Pedayah said, “Would that someone remove the dust from your eyes, O first Adam, you who could not persevere in your temptation for even a single hour, while here your children are keeping all the commandments which were given to them and persevering in them!”⁴⁶Gen. R. 21:7; cf. Lev. R. 25:2. One of them rises to plant, till, weed, prune, take pains to irrigate, and see the fruits of his plantings when they produce first fruits. Then he folds his hands and does not taste them, in order to fulfill what is stated (in Lev. 19:23), “three years it shall be [forbidden] to you….” But in the case of the first Adam, it was told him, “Eat of this, and do not eat of that,” and he was not able to remain obedient to the commandment for a single hour. Instead (according to Gen. 3:6), “then she also gave some to her husband, and he ate,” but [when] your children were commanded to eat this and not to eat that, [they remained obedient to those commandments]. And [this obedience is] especially [evident] when someone from Israel takes a bovine, an ox, or a lamb, slaughters it ritually, skins it, washes it, and inspects its health. When it is found to be unfit, he holds back and does not eat it. Ergo (in II Sam. 22:31 = Ps. 18:31, cont.), “the word of the Lord is pure.” For that reason, the first Adam was not commanded, because it was revealed to the Holy One, blessed be He, that he could not remain obedient to many commandments; as behold, he was commanded [only] one commandment, and he did not persevere with it. But in the case of Israel, when the Holy One, blessed be He, gave them many commandments, they observed them. He therefore expanded the Torah and commandments for them, and said to them (in Lev. 11:2-7), “These are the creatures that you may eat…. These, however, you may not eat…: the camel […]; the rock badger […]; the hare […]; and the pig.” Another interpretation of (Lev. 11:4-7). The camel (rt.: gml) represents the kingdom of Babylon, since it is stated (in Ps. 137:8), “O Daughter of Babylon, who are to be destroyed, fortunate is the one who repays you the recompense (rt.: gml) [with which you recompensed (rt.: gml) us].” The rock badger represents the kingdom of Media, since it made Israel into a corner and ownerless (as in Esth. 3:6), “to exterminate, to kill and to destroy all [the Jews]…”;⁴⁷The exact relation of the rock badger (ha’arnevet) to Media is unclear. One possibility is suggested by Lev. 11:6, according to which the rock badger has marks of both uncleanness and cleanness. Lev. R. 13:5 reports two versions of such an interpretation. The Rabbis interpreted this mix to mean that Media produced a righteous as well as a wicked person (perhaps Haman and Mordecai or Haman and Darius the Mede of Dan. 11:1). According to R. Judah b. R. Simon, the last Darius was clean on the side of his mother Esther and unclean on his father’s side. and likewise, the name of Ptolemy’s wife was rock badger (arnevet). The hare alludes to Greece, since it brought low the Torah from the mouth of the prophets.⁴⁸Probably because prophecy ceased under Greek rule; but according to Lev. R. 13:5, “hare” alludes to the Greek kingdom, because Ptolemy’s mother was named “Hare.” Cf. yMeg. 1:11 (71d), according to which the Greek translators of Lev. 11:6 emended “hare” to “short-legged one” for the same reason. Cf. also Meg. 90b, according to which it was Ptolemy’s wife who was named Hare. In actuality the person named “Hare” (Gk.: Lagos) was Ptolemy’s father. As it is stated (in Amos 8:11), “Behold days are coming says the Lord, God, and I will send a hunger…”; and it is written (in Amos 8:12), “And they shall wander from sea to sea….” How is this? In the future to come the Holy One, blessed be He, will issue a proclamation: Whoever has been engaged in such and such a commandment may come and receive his reward. Then the gentiles also will say, “Give us our reward, for we have performed a commandment.” The Holy One, blessed be He, [however] has said, “Whoever has observed the [commandments of the] Torah may come and receive his reward.”

Job said (in Job 14:4), “Who can produce something clean out of something unclean, no one.” After the Holy One, blessed be He, permitted the cow and forbade the camel, who could declare clean or declare unclean? Who has done so? Is it not the One? Is it not the singular One of the world? Come and see: Originally at the creation of the world, everything was permitted, as stated (in Gen. 9:3), “as with the green grass, I have given you everything.” And it states (in Gen. 1:31), “And God saw everything that He had done, and behold, it was good.” Then after Israel stood by Mount Sinai, He increased Torah and commandments for them in order to give them a good reward. But if so, why did He not so command the first Adam? The Holy One, blessed be He, said, “When I ordained an easy commandment for him, he transgressed against it. How could he fulfill all these commandments? On the very day on which it was commanded, on that day he transgressed against it. He was unable to remain obedient to the command for a single hour. How did the Holy One, blessed be He, create Adam? R. Judah ben Pedayah said, “[Twelve hours make up the day.] In the first hour the first Adam arose in the thought of the Holy One, blessed be He, [with a view] to creation.⁴⁵PRK 23:1; PR 46:2; M. Pss. 92:3; Lev. R. 29:1; cf. Sanh. 38b; ARN, A, 1; PRE 11. In the second He consulted with the ministering angels and said (in Gen. 1:26), ‘Let us make man in our image.’ In the third He gathered his dust. In the fourth He kneaded him. In the fifth He shaped him. In the sixth He stood him up as a golem. In the seventh He blew breath into him. In the eighth He brought him into the Garden of Eden. In the ninth He commanded him, ‘Eat of this, and do not eat of that.’ In the tenth [Adam] sinned. In the eleventh he was judged. In the twelfth he was expelled.” Thus you must conclude that he did not remain obedient to the commandment for even a single hour. R. Judah ben Pedayah said, “Would that someone remove the dust from your eyes, O first Adam, you who could not persevere in your temptation for even a single hour, while here your children are keeping all the commandments which were given to them and persevering in them!”⁴⁶Gen. R. 21:7; cf. Lev. R. 25:2. One of them rises to plant, till, weed, prune, take pains to irrigate, and see the fruits of his plantings when they produce first fruits. Then he folds his hands and does not taste them, in order to fulfill what is stated (in Lev. 19:23), “three years it shall be [forbidden] to you….” But in the case of the first Adam, it was told him, “Eat of this, and do not eat of that,” and he was not able to remain obedient to the commandment for a single hour. Instead (according to Gen. 3:6), “then she also gave some to her husband, and he ate,” but [when] your children were commanded to eat this and not to eat that, [they remained obedient to those commandments]. And [this obedience is] especially [evident] when someone from Israel takes a bovine, an ox, or a lamb, slaughters it ritually, skins it, washes it, and inspects its health. When it is found to be unfit, he holds back and does not eat it. Ergo (in II Sam. 22:31 = Ps. 18:31, cont.), “the word of the Lord is pure.” For that reason, the first Adam was not commanded, because it was revealed to the Holy One, blessed be He, that he could not remain obedient to many commandments; as behold, he was commanded [only] one commandment, and he did not persevere with it. But in the case of Israel, when the Holy One, blessed be He, gave them many commandments, they observed them. He therefore expanded the Torah and commandments for them, and said to them (in Lev. 11:2-7), “These are the creatures that you may eat…. These, however, you may not eat…: the camel […]; the rock badger […]; the hare […]; and the pig.” Another interpretation of (Lev. 11:4-7). The camel (rt.: gml) represents the kingdom of Babylon, since it is stated (in Ps. 137:8), “O Daughter of Babylon, who are to be destroyed, fortunate is the one who repays you the recompense (rt.: gml) [with which you recompensed (rt.: gml) us].” The rock badger represents the kingdom of Media, since it made Israel into a corner and ownerless (as in Esth. 3:6), “to exterminate, to kill and to destroy all [the Jews]…”;⁴⁷The exact relation of the rock badger (ha’arnevet) to Media is unclear. One possibility is suggested by Lev. 11:6, according to which the rock badger has marks of both uncleanness and cleanness. Lev. R. 13:5 reports two versions of such an interpretation. The Rabbis interpreted this mix to mean that Media produced a righteous as well as a wicked person (perhaps Haman and Mordecai or Haman and Darius the Mede of Dan. 11:1). According to R. Judah b. R. Simon, the last Darius was clean on the side of his mother Esther and unclean on his father’s side. and likewise, the name of Ptolemy’s wife was rock badger (arnevet). The hare alludes to Greece, since it brought low the Torah from the mouth of the prophets.⁴⁸Probably because prophecy ceased under Greek rule; but according to Lev. R. 13:5, “hare” alludes to the Greek kingdom, because Ptolemy’s mother was named “Hare.” Cf. yMeg. 1:11 (71d), according to which the Greek translators of Lev. 11:6 emended “hare” to “short-legged one” for the same reason. Cf. also Meg. 90b, according to which it was Ptolemy’s wife who was named Hare. In actuality the person named “Hare” (Gk.: Lagos) was Ptolemy’s father. As it is stated (in Amos 8:11), “Behold days are coming says the Lord, God, and I will send a hunger…”; and it is written (in Amos 8:12), “And they shall wander from sea to sea….” How is this? In the future to come the Holy One, blessed be He, will issue a proclamation: Whoever has been engaged in such and such a commandment may come and receive his reward. Then the gentiles also will say, “Give us our reward, for we have performed a commandment.” The Holy One, blessed be He, [however] has said, “Whoever has observed the [commandments of the] Torah may come and receive his reward.”

...The Rabbis say: God finds it hard to decree death upon the righteous. Whence this? For it is said, "Grievous in the sight of the Lord is the death of His saints (Psalms 116:15). And this is the proof. God should have spoken to Moses thus: "Behold you are about to die." God, however, did not speak in this way, but spared him and attached death to the days. Whence this? From what we read about the matter, "Behold, your days approach, to die."

Rabbi Nathaniel said: Three hundred years before the birth of Josiah, was his name mentioned, as it is said, "Behold, a child shall be born unto the house of David, Josiah by name" (1 Kings 13:2); "And he was eight years old when he began to reign" (2 Kings 22:1). What is the disposition of a lad of eight years of age? He despised the idols and broke in pieces the pillars, and smashed the images and cut down the groves. His merit was great before the Throne of Glory. Because of the evil which Israel did in secret the righteous one was gathered (to his fathers), as it is said, "For the righteous is taken away because of the evil" (Isa. 57:1). || All Judah gathered together also with Jeremiah the prophet to show loving-kindness to Josiah, as it is said, "And Jeremiah lamented for Josiah, and all the singing men and the singing women spake of Josiah" (2 Chron. 35:25). Rabbi Meir said: "The singing men" refer to the Levites, who stood upon the platform singing; "and the singing women" refer to their wives. Rabbi Simeon said: These terms do not refer merely to the Levites and their wives; but to the skilled women, as it is said, "Thus saith the Lord of hosts, Consider ye, and call for the mourning women, that they may come; and send for the cunning women, that they may come: and let them make haste, and take up a wailing for us" (Jer. 9:17, 18). Hence the wise men instituted (the rule) that this should be done to all the wise men of Israel and to their great men, as it is said, "And they made them an ordinance in Israel" (2 Chron. 35:25).

(Fol. 138b) Rab said: "There will be a time in the future when the Torah will be forgotten by Israel, as it is said (Deu. 28, 59.) Then will the Lord render wonderful thy plagues. I do not know what the word Hafla'ah (wonderful) means. But when it is said (Is. 29, 14.) Therefore, behold, I will do yet further a marvelous work with the people doing wonder on wonder (Ilaflei Vafele); so that the wisdom of their wise men shall be lost and the understanding of their prudent men shall be hidden. I understand that Hafla'ah refers to the Torah."Our Rabbis taught: When our Rabbis entered the Kerem (college) of Jamnia, they said: 'There will be a time when the Torah will be forgotten by Israel, as it is said (Amos 8. 11.) Behold, days are coming, saith the Lord God, when I will send a famine in the land; not a famine for bread, nor a thirst for water, but to hear the words of the Lord. And they will wander about from sea to sea, and from the North even to the East, they will roam about to seek the word of the Lord; but they shall not find it. The words of the Lord, alludes to Halacha (laws); The words of the Lord, refers to the end of the exile (Messiah); by The word of the Lord, is meant Prophecy."

An analogy: Two men meet, and they do not separate from each other until one has walked a mil, and the other, a mil, at which time they are found to be at a distance of two mills from each other. Variantly: Lest you say: There are the sons of the elders, there are the sons of the great ones, there are the sons of the prophets (i.e., Let them study the Torah!) It is, therefore, written "For if keep, you (plural [i.e., all of you]) shall keep all of this mitzvah." We are hereby taught that all are equal in (the mitzvah of studying) Torah. And thus is it written (Devarim 33:4) "Torah was commanded to us by Moses, the inheritance of the congregation of Jacob": It is not written "Cohanim, Levites, and Israelites," but "the congregation of Jacob." And thus is it written (Ibid. 29:9) "You are standing this day, all of you, before the L-rd your G-d, your heads of your tribes, your elders and your officers, all the men of Israel." If not for (all of) these, who stood and fulfilled Torah in Israel, would Torah not have been forgotten in Israel? And if Shafan in his time (viz. II Kings 22) and Ezra in his time and R. Akiva in his time had not stood up (on behalf of Torah), would Torah not have been forgotten in Israel? And it is written (Proverbs 15:3) "A thing in its time — how good!" The thing that this one (i.e., each one of those in his time) said is over and against all! It is written (Amos 8:12) "They will wander to seek the word of the L-rd and they will not find it": As a tourist, who goes from city to city and from province to province, so is a woman destined to make the rounds of the houses of prayer and the houses of study about a sheretz (a creeping thing) that had touched a loaf to determine whether (this is an instance of) first-degree or second-degree tumah (uncleanliness). R. Shimon b. Yochai says: G-d forbid (to say) that Torah will be forgotten from Israel. Is it not written (Devarim 31:21) "for it will not be forgotten from the mouth of their seed"? How, then, am I to understand "They will wander to seek the word of the L-rd and they will not find it"? They will not find a clear halachah in one place, but one man will forbid, and another permit; one man will rule unclean, and another, clean, and they will not find a clear thing.