Talmud su Deuteronomio 14:24

HALAKHAH: “One does not sell Second Tithe.” One does not sell it because holiness is written for it³Lev. 27:30.. One does not use it as a pledge because blessing is written about it⁴Deut. 14:24. Taking a loan and giving a pledge is not a sign of blessing.. “⁵A similar text in Tosephta 1:1: “How may one not sell it? One should not say, here is 200 [zuz] worth, give me 100 in exchange.” If Second Tithe were sold, it would not be redeemed and the buyer would have to eat the produce in purity and sanctity in Jerusalem (assuming the existence of the Temple.) How may one not sell it? A person should not say to his neighbor, here you have this mina’s worth of Second Tithe, give me 50 zuz profane for it.”

Who is the Tanna of “one does not sell it”? Rebbi Meїr⁶R. Meїr considers Second Tithe as property of Heaven given to the farmer for consumption in holiness. For R. Jehudah, Second Tithe is private property. Their disagreement is in Mishnah Qiddušin 2:8, cf. Demay Chapter 1, Notes 185–186.! But for Rebbi Jehudah it should be logical that it be permitted to be sold, by an argument a minore ad majus: If it is permitted to sell heave⁷As mentioned many times in Mishnah Terumot; e. g. Mishnah 4:1. which is forbidden to lay people, since Second Tithe is permitted to lay people, one should certainly be permitted to sell it. No, if you assert this for heave which does not need an enclosure, what can you imply for Second Tithe which needs an enclosure⁸Deut. 14:24 requires that Second Tithe be consumed “at the place chosen by the Eternal, your God.” This place must be designated somehow. We have no record that the sanctuary at Shilo was within walls, but some enclosure must have defined the sacred space. It is accepted that the ancient walls of Jerusalem defined the sacred space for Second Tithe. In contrast, heave may be consumed by the priests anywhere in the Land.? First Fruits shall prove it which need an enclosure⁹Since they have to be brought to the Temple. The operative enclosure here is the courtyard of the Tabernacle or the outer wall of the Temple. The receiving priest is permitted to sell to another priest. and one may sell them! No, if you assert this for First Fruits which do not implicate their monetary substitute¹⁰The money is profane., what can you imply for Second Heave which implicates its monetary substitute¹¹The money must be taken to Jerusalem as Second Tithe, Deut. 14:24. The argument could have been formulated: The sale of First Fruits is a sale, the sale of Second Tithe is a redemption.! The Sabbatical shall prove it which implicates its monetary substitute¹²Mishnah Ševi‘it 8:8. and it is permitted to sell it! Rebbi Yudan said, from this? The sale of Sabbatical produce is its redemption¹³The sale of Sabbatical produce, as authorized in Mishnah Ševi‘it Chapter 8, cannot be characterized as a sale but is a redemption which does not impinge on the holiness of the produce which remains Sabbatical. But exchanged Second Tithe is totally profane. Therefore, there is no proof that R. Jehudah would permit the sale of unexchanged Second Tithe..

HALAKHAH: Rebbi Tanhum bar Ilai in the name of Rebbi Yose ben Ḥanina: So answer the House of Shammai to the House of Hillel: May any obligatory sacrifice come from tithe¹¹¹It is implied in Halakhah 2 that the 1 and 2 oboloi required in Mishnah 2 must be profane money.? They said to them, if it were a weekday, could he not bring one from profane money and add the tithe money? And here he brings one from profane money and adds tithe money¹¹²Also on the holiday.. From where that one may add [tithe money]? Rebbi Yose ben Ḥanina said, it is said here measure¹¹³Deut. 16:10, referring to the holiday of Pentecost which has no intermediary days. The root of the word is taken (with many moderns) to be נשׂא., and it is said there, for you cannot carry it¹¹⁴Deut. 14:24, referring to Second Tithe; same root.. Since carrying mentioned there refers to tithe, so also here tithe. Rebbi Eleazar said, it mentions joy here and it mentions joy there¹¹⁵“Joy” as commandment to enjoy meat is repeatedly mentioned for holidays in Deut. 16, and referring to Second Tithe in Deut. 14:26.. Since joy mentioned there refers to tithe, so also joy mentioned here refers to tithe. Could not all of them be brought from tithe money? Ulla bar Ismael said, it is said here measure and it is said there, the gift for Benjamin exceeded¹¹⁶Gen. 43:34, same root.. Since gift which is mentioned there refers to one as principal¹¹⁷The gift to every brother. and the remainder addition, so also here one is principal and the remainder addition. Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Abun said, are not the voluntary well-being offerings like the well-being offerings of the holiday? Why does he add those verses?¹¹⁸Why are those somewhat shaky derivations needed at all? To tell you that for them one pushes aside the holiday¹¹⁹To justify the House of Hillel who in matters of well-being sacrifices treat full holidays on the same level as the intermediate days..