Talmud su Deuteronomio 22:26

Jacob bar Abba asked before Rav: What is the law for him who comes to a minor¹³⁰A preliminarily married underage girl, whether by seduction or rape.? He said to him, by stoning. What is the law for him who comes to an adult? He said to him, I am reading “an adolescent¹³¹In Deut. 22:29.”, not an adult.¹³²The man who commits adultery with an adult preliminarily married woman is punished for adultery, as if it were with a definitively married woman. Read “an adolescent”, not a minor! “‘Because he mistreated her’, that includes a minor for a fine”, read ‘because he mistreaded her’,¹³¹In Deut. 22:29. that includes an adult for a fine! Rav said, even though Jacob won the logical argument, practice is that he who comes to a minor is [punished] by stoning but she is free. Rebbi Abin in the name of Samuel: Why? He understood it from the following¹³³Deut. 22:26, speaking of the preliminarily married rape victim. It should be obvious that the rape victim is innocent; why does the verse have to emphasize this?: “The man who had lain with her alone should die.” Did we not know that “the girl has not committed a capital crime”? Then why does the verse say: “Do not do anything to the girl, the girl has not committed a capital crime”? That includes him who comes to a preliminarily married underage girl that he is stoned and she is free¹³⁴The verse is not written for the adolescent rape victim, whose innocence is obvious, but for the consenting underage girl who would have committed a capital crime had she been adolescent. But because of her age, her seduction was statutory rape and she is immune from any form of punishment..