Talmud su Deuteronomio 24:7
כִּי־יִמָּצֵ֣א אִ֗ישׁ גֹּנֵ֨ב נֶ֤פֶשׁ מֵאֶחָיו֙ מִבְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל וְהִתְעַמֶּר־בּ֖וֹ וּמְכָר֑וֹ וּמֵת֙ הַגַּנָּ֣ב הַה֔וּא וּבִֽעַרְתָּ֥ הָרָ֖ע מִקִּרְבֶּֽךָ׃
Se viene trovato un uomo che ruba uno dei suoi fratelli ai figli d'Israele, lo tratta come uno schiavo e lo vende; allora quel ladro morirà; così allontanerai il male da te stesso.
Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin
What is the reason of Rebbi Joḥanan ben Beroqa? Of the Children of Israel. What is the reason of the rabbis? Of his brothers, not his sons20Deut. 24:7 reads: If a man be found kidnapping one of his brothers, of the Children of Israel, and enslaves him or sells him, the kidnapper shall die; you shall eliminate evil from Israel. This paragraph speaks of the son, the next (cf. Note 17) of the half-emancipated slave. Sifry Deut. 273 parallels the first paragraph but in the case of the semi-emancipated slave treats the rabbis’ as unanimous opinion. The Babli 86a finds a reason to exclude the semi-emancipated slave from the partitive mem in the verse of the Children of Israel, which implies “not all of the Children of Israel.”. What is the reason of Rebbi Jehudah? Of his brothers, even partially his brother. What is the reason of the rabbis? Of his brothers, unless he be totally his brother.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin
HALAKHAH: “The Elder who rebels,” etc. Halakhah 4: “If he returned to his town, repeated and taught as was his custom,” etc. 27This baraita exists in two other versions, Babli 87a and Sifry Deut. 152. It is the subject of a study by E. A. Finkelstein, HUCA XXXII (1961) א-כה. It is written20Deut. 24:7 reads: If a man be found kidnapping one of his brothers, of the Children of Israel, and enslaves him or sells him, the kidnapper shall die; you shall eliminate evil from Israel. This paragraph speaks of the son, the next (cf. Note 17) of the half-emancipated slave. Sifry Deut. 273 parallels the first paragraph but in the case of the semi-emancipated slave treats the rabbis’ as unanimous opinion. The Babli 86a finds a reason to exclude the semi-emancipated slave from the partitive mem in the verse of the Children of Israel, which implies “not all of the Children of Israel.”: If something is being distinguished for you in law, this shows that the verse speaks about the distinguished member of the court28The person representing the lower court before the Supreme Court has to be its most distinguished member.. For you, this is counsel. Something is sermonizing29In the parallel sources: This is practice. Since the verse defines the areas of competence of the Supreme Court, it is difficult to see what the legal relevance of aggadah could be unless one subscribes to Maimonides’s opinion that all interpretations of biblical verses by the hermeneutical rules are rabbinic in character, i. e., aggadic.. Whether blood and blood, whether menstrual blood or blood of virginity; whether menstrual blood, blood of flux, or blood of skin disease30As Finkelstein points out, the plain text of the verse seems to restrict the objects of appeal to purely legal cases; the interpretation given here extends it to all areas of life.. Whether case or case, between those who are stoned, or burned, or decapitated, or strangled31This sentence is missing in the parallel sources; it already is contained in the other explanations of the same clause.. Whether defect or defect, between a quarantined sufferer from skin disease or an absolute one31,This sentence is missing in the parallel sources; it already is contained in the other explanations of the same clause.32Cf. Chapter 10, Note 284.; whether defect or defect, between defects of humans or of garments or of houses33Lev. 13,14.. Words, that is the drinking of the suspected adulteress, breaking the neck of the calf, and the purification of the sufferer from skin disease34While the suspected adulteress drinks water with which written words were obliterated (Num. 5:23) and the expiation of an unsolved murder case requires the priests to recite words (Deut. 21:7–8), the purification of the the sufferer from skin disease is a wordless ceremony. Rashi in the Babli explains that skin disease is punishment for calumniating. One could explain that the first step in the purification is a declaration by a priest that the skin disease was healed and his command to assemble the items necessary for purification (Lev. 14:3–4).. Quarrels, these are estimations, bans, and dedications35Lev. 27; all of these need dedications by explicit declaration.. You shall get up, from the court, and rise, this is the ascent36Climbing up all the way to Jerusalem..
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy