Talmud su Deuteronomio 26:10

HALAKHAH: “How does one designate First Fruits? Etc.” In the opinion of Rebbi Simeon, if he did not call them when they were picked they are not sanctified, they do not create dema‘¹If they are mixed with profane fruits and are unrecognizable, the mixture is permitted to laymen., one is not required to add a fifth²If misappropriated, the amount of restitution has to be 100%, not 125%., and one is not whipped for them outside the wall³If eaten outside the city walls of Jerusalem.. What is the reason of the rabbis? (Deut. 26:10) “Now, behold, I brought the first of the fruits of the earth.” At the moment of presentation it must be a fruit, but also at the moment of dedication? Even unripe grapes, even unripe figs! In the opinion of Rebbi Simeon, since at the moment of presentation it must be a fruit, so also at the moment of dedication it must be a fruit.

“⁷⁸This is a Babylonian baraita, quoted in Babli Soṭa 14b, Zebaḥim 66a, Menaḥot 19b. The Babylonian character is shown by the use of אי as “if”. One puts them⁷⁹The First Fruits to be deposited near the altar. The problem treated is an apparent contradiction between the prescriptions contained in verses 4 and 10 of Chap. 26. near the South-West corner. (Deut. 26:10) ‘Before the Eternal’, that should mean the West. The verse says (Deut. 26:4) ‘at the face of the altar.’ If it is at the face of the altar that should mean the South⁸⁰The entrance to the Temple precinct was to the East. Going from East to West one has the outer and inner courtyards, then the Cohanim’s court containing the altar, and to the West the Temple building containing the holiest of holies, counted as the Presence of the Eternal. The access to the altar was via the ramp built at its South side. Therefore, “before the Eternal” means before the Temple building, to the West of the altar. “At the face of the altar” means at the South side.. The verse says ‘before the Eternal’! How is that? He presents them at the South-Western corner and puts them down South of the corner.”

MISHNAH: Rebbi Eliezer ben Jacob says, a woman, daughter of proselytes, should not marry a Cohen unless her mother is from Israel⁸¹The dissenting opinions are in Mishnah Qiddušin 4:8. The discussion in the Halakhah is repeated in Qiddušin 4:6 (fol. 66a).. There is no difference between proselytes and freedmen, even up to ten generations, unless their mothers be from Israel. The guardians⁸²Administrators of orphans’ property; Greek ἐπίτροπος., the slave⁸³A freed slave owning property., the agent⁸⁴The possibility of agency for the presentation of First Fruits is discussed in Halakhah 6., the woman⁸⁵Who brings First Fruits from her private property., the sexless, and the hermaphrodite⁸⁶They possibly are female. can bring but not make the declaration, since they cannot say (Deut.26:10): “Which You gave me, Eternal.”