Talmud su Esodo 19:13
לֹא־תִגַּ֨ע בּ֜וֹ יָ֗ד כִּֽי־סָק֤וֹל יִסָּקֵל֙ אוֹ־יָרֹ֣ה יִיָּרֶ֔ה אִם־בְּהֵמָ֥ה אִם־אִ֖ישׁ לֹ֣א יִחְיֶ֑ה בִּמְשֹׁךְ֙ הַיֹּבֵ֔ל הֵ֖מָּה יַעֲל֥וּ בָהָֽר׃
Nol tocchi mano, ma si lapidi, o si saetti; sia bestia, sia uomo, non viva. Quando verrà suonata la buccina, essi saliranno pel monte (XXIV. 1.9).
Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin
59Babli 45a; Mekhilta dR. Ismael Yitro 3 (p. 212); Mekhilta dR. Simeon ben Johai Yitro p. 141. From where that he needs to be stoned? For it is said60Ex. 19:13., by stoning he be stoned. From where that he needs to be pushed? For it is said, by pushing he be pushed. 61In the parallel sources: From where that is is sufficient if he dies from being pushed? In the opinion of Pene Moshe, the second pushing is the turning on his back if he lands on his face. From where that he needs two pushings? The verse says, to be pushed.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jerusalem Talmud Bava Kamma
MISHNAH: The ox and any domestic animal equally are under the rules of falling into a pit, separating from Mount Sinai88Ex. 19:13., paying double restitution, returning lost property, unloading, muzzling, interbreeding, and the Sabbath. Wild animals and birds follow the same rules. Then why was it said “ox or donkey”? But the verse speaks of the actuality87At the time of the promulgation of the Law, these were the most frequent cases..
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jerusalem Talmud Bava Kamma
HALAKHAH: “The ox and any domestic animal equally are under the rules of falling into a pit,” etc. Falling into a pit, “and an ox or a donkey fell in there.56Ex. 21:33.” Separating from Mount Sinai, “neither animal nor man shall live.88Ex. 19:13.” Paying double restitution, “from ox to donkey89Ex. 22:3, the penalty for the thief found with livestock.”. To return lost property, “you shall certainly return them90Deut. 22:1..” Unloading, “do remove91Ex.. 23:5..” Muzzling, “do not muzzle an ox while threshing92Deut. 25:4..” Interbreeding, “your animal you shall not breed kilaim93Lev. 19:19..” The Sabbath, “that your ox and your donkey may rest94Ex. 23:12..”
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin
HALAKHAH: “The sorcerer is one who does a deed,” etc. A sorceress you shall not let live363Ex. 22:17., whether man or woman, but the Torah taught you the way of the world that most women have a tendency to sorcery364Babli 67a and Mekhilta dR. Simeon ben Iohai, ad loc., the first part only in Mekhilta dR. Ismael, ad loc.. Rebbi Eliezer said, a sorcerer is [executed] by stoning. What is Rebbi Eliezer’s reason? It says here, a sorceress you shall not let live, and it says there, whether human or animal they shall not live365Ex. 19:13. The verse requires stoning or shooting the transgressor.
In the Babylonian sources (Babli and the two Mekhiltot), this argument is attributed to R. Aqiba, who in the Yerushalmi rejects it.. Since shall not live there means by stoning, also here by stoning. What is the rabbis’366There “rabbis” oppose the Mishnah and decree beheading for the sorcerer; in Babli and Mekhilta dR. Simeon ben Iohai the author is R. Yose the Galilean, in Mekhilta dR. Ismael it is R. Ismael. reason? It says here, a sorceress you shall not let live, and it says there, you shall not let live anybody367Deut. 20:16.. Since you shall not let live there means death by the sword, also you shall not let live here means death by the sword. Rebbi Aqiba said, from this argument I am deciding. It is preferable to learn you shall not let live from you shall not let live rather than from shall not live. What is Rebbi Jehudah’s reason368The student of R. Eliezer’s student gives the final argument for the Mishnah. In the Babli (here and Berakhot 21b) and Mekhilta dR. Simeon ben Iohai his argument is attributed to Ben Azzai, in Mekhilta dR. Ismael to R. Yose the Galilean.? It says here, a sorceress you shall not let live, and it says there, anybody lying with an animal shall die the death369Ex. 22:18, the verse following the one about the sorceress. Since in v. 17 the method of execution is not indicated, the instruction of v. 18 is interpreted in the light of Lev. 20:15–16 and applied to both verses.. Since the execution of the animal is by stoning, so here also by stoning370Since for animals the only explicitly mentioned example of execution is the stoning of the notorious bull..
In the Babylonian sources (Babli and the two Mekhiltot), this argument is attributed to R. Aqiba, who in the Yerushalmi rejects it.. Since shall not live there means by stoning, also here by stoning. What is the rabbis’366There “rabbis” oppose the Mishnah and decree beheading for the sorcerer; in Babli and Mekhilta dR. Simeon ben Iohai the author is R. Yose the Galilean, in Mekhilta dR. Ismael it is R. Ismael. reason? It says here, a sorceress you shall not let live, and it says there, you shall not let live anybody367Deut. 20:16.. Since you shall not let live there means death by the sword, also you shall not let live here means death by the sword. Rebbi Aqiba said, from this argument I am deciding. It is preferable to learn you shall not let live from you shall not let live rather than from shall not live. What is Rebbi Jehudah’s reason368The student of R. Eliezer’s student gives the final argument for the Mishnah. In the Babli (here and Berakhot 21b) and Mekhilta dR. Simeon ben Iohai his argument is attributed to Ben Azzai, in Mekhilta dR. Ismael to R. Yose the Galilean.? It says here, a sorceress you shall not let live, and it says there, anybody lying with an animal shall die the death369Ex. 22:18, the verse following the one about the sorceress. Since in v. 17 the method of execution is not indicated, the instruction of v. 18 is interpreted in the light of Lev. 20:15–16 and applied to both verses.. Since the execution of the animal is by stoning, so here also by stoning370Since for animals the only explicitly mentioned example of execution is the stoning of the notorious bull..
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy