Talmud su Isaia 8:21

HALAKHAH: “How does one annul it,” etc? Rebbi Ze`ira said, this is if he sold it in peace<sup>93</sup>Only permanent damage is acceptable.. But if he sold it in ill-will, everybody agrees that it is annulled; it happens that he is hungry, falls into a rage, and curses his king<sup>94</sup>Is. 8:21. The Babli uses the same verse as a reason for which a contemptuous treatment of an idol is not an annulment; 53a. etc. Ze`ur bar Ḥinena in the name of Rebbi Ḥanina: They disagreed in case he sold it to a goldsmith⁹⁵The disagreement between R. Joḥanan and Rav is formulated in the Babli (53a) about whether the idol is sold to a Jewish or a Gentile goldsmith, without exact attribution of authorship.. But if he sold it to its worshipper, everybody agrees that it is not annulled. Rav Jeremiah in the name of Rav: they disagreed if he sold it to its worshippers. But if he sold it to a goldsmith everybody agrees that it is annulled. Rebbi Jacob bar Aḥa in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan: the opinion of everybody. Rebbi Hila in the name of Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish: in dispute⁹⁶It is not spelled out what they are referring to. The next sentence makes this clear.. It turns out that Rebbi Ḥanina held with Rebbi Joḥanan and Rav Jeremiah with Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish. What about it? They disagreed in case he sold it to a goldsmith. But if he sold it to one of its worshippers, everybody agrees that it is not annulled⁹⁷The decision follows R, Joḥanan and the goldsmith must be a Jew who will melt down the idol..