Talmud su Levitico 11:28

It is written (Lev. 11:28): “They are impure for you”. Why does it say (Lev. 11:35) “they shall be impure for you”? One is for the prohibition of eating, the other for the prohibition of usufruct⁷⁵The argument is also found in Orlah 3:1 (fol. 63d), Pesaḥim 2:1 (fol. 28c), Baba Qama 7:10 (fol. 6a), Babli Pesaḥim 21b, Qiddušin 56b, Baba Qama41a, Ḥulin 114b. The formulation in the Babli is: R. Abbahu said, every place where it is stated “it should not be eaten, do not eat” implies both prohibition as food and of usufruct unless the Torah details the permission of usufruct as for cadavers (Deut. 14:21). One has to assume that “anything forbidden” mentioned here also means “anything forbidden as food.”. Anything forbidden by the Torah is forbidden for trade but everything whose prohibition is rabbinical is permitted for trade. But is there not the donkey⁷⁶Donkey meat is forbidden. The camel should have been mentioned first since it is mentioned explicitly as forbidden animal; donkey meat is forbidden by the general clause permitting only ruminants.? It is raised for work. Is there not the camel? It is raised for work. Rebbi Yehoshaiah traded in muries⁷⁷Brine possibly made with wine (cf. Demay Chapter 1, Note 156). The nature of the prohibition is discussed in Terumot 11:1 (fol. 47c); it is agreed that the prohibition is rabbinical., Rebbi Ḥuna traded in asafoetida⁷⁸It is not clear how and why asafoetida would be prohibited. The best explanation is that of Pene Moshe(Margalit) that medicines are neither food nor dyestuff and, hence, may be traded in the Sabbatical year..

Blood on a loaf of bread one shaves off and eats [the bread]. If it came from between his teeth he eats and does not worry⁶⁵Tosephta 7:11 (in the name of R. Joshua), Babli Keritut 21b. In the Babli, blood from bleeding gums has to be sucked off (it may be swallowed), in the Tosephta it has to be wiped off. Blood on the bread (no longer liquid) is only rabbinically forbidden.. The abominations among mites, flies, wild bees, abominations and crawling things⁶⁶The list is in Tosephta 7:11, Babli Ḥulin 67b. The derivation from the verse is only here; a different one in Sifra Šemini 12(1)., I might think [that they are forbidden] while they are inside the fruit, the verse says (Lev. 11:26,27,28): “They are impure,” when they exist independently rather than inside the fruit. I might think, even if they left and returned; the verse says “they are impure,” even if they left and returned. Rav Ḥiyya bar Ashi in the name of Rav: As soon as they reach the rim of the food they are forbidden even if they return⁶⁷As soon as any part of a worm or insect developing inside a fruit is visible from the outside, it becomes forbidden. (In talmudic theory, worms and insects develop spontaneously, not from eggs, and, therefore, may be considered as part of the fruit.).

¹⁰⁰This is from Ševi’it 7:4, Notes 75–76 (‘Orlah 3:1, Pesaḥim 2:1). It is written¹⁰¹Lev. 11:28.: “They are impure for you”. Why does it say¹⁰²Lev. 11:35. “they shall be impure for you”? One is for the prohibition of eating, the other for the prohibition of usufruct. Anything forbidden [by the Torah is forbidden for trade, but everything whose prohibition]¹⁰³Text missing in the Leiden ms.; (the scribe skipped from איסורו to איסורו), taken from E, supported by the Genizah text and the parallels. is rabbinical is permitted for trade. But is there not the donkey? It is raised for work. Is there not the camel? It is raised for work.