Talmud su Levitico 13:54
וְצִוָּה֙ הַכֹּהֵ֔ן וְכִ֨בְּס֔וּ אֵ֥ת אֲשֶׁר־בּ֖וֹ הַנָּ֑גַע וְהִסְגִּיר֥וֹ שִׁבְעַת־יָמִ֖ים שֵׁנִֽית׃
allora il sacerdote comanderà di lavare la cosa in cui si trova la peste, e la zittirà ancora per sette giorni.
Jerusalem Talmud Shabbat
A woman after her period who was immersed by accident, Shammai in the name of Rav: she is pure for her house but impure for purities68She unintentionally fell into water which qualifies as a miqweh. In this opinion, an intent to become pure by immersion is needed only to be able to prepare pure food (“purities”) whereas to be permitted to her husband (“pure for her house”) she only has to be immersed since in the relevant biblical paragraph (Lev. 15:19–24) immersion is explicitly required only of people coming in contact with movables on which she sat during her period of impurity. The opposing opinion requires intent for any purification. Babli Ḥulin 31a.. Rebbi Eleazar in the name of Rebbi Ḥanina, she is impure both for her house and purities. What is the reason? It should be washed a second time and will be pure69Lev. 15:59, about impurity of textiles. The remark “a second time” is taken as indication that the second washing has to follow the rules of the first; Babli Ḥulin 31b. A different interpretation in Sifra Tazriaˋ Pereq 16(11). Since the first time it was intentionally, also the second time it must be intentionally. And from where that the first time it was intentionally? The Cohen has to order that they should wash70Lev. 13:54.. Intentionally.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jerusalem Talmud Megillah
A woman after her period who was immersed by accident, Rebbi Shammai in the name of Rav: she is pure for her house but impure for purities101She unintentionally fell into water which qualifies as a miqweh. In this opinion, an intent to become pure by immersion is needed only to be able to prepare pure food (“purities”) whereas to be permitted to her husband (“pure for her house”) she only has to be immersed since in the relevant biblical paragraph (Lev. 15:19–24) immersion is explicitly required only of people coming in contact with movables on which she sat during her period of impurity. The opposing opinion requires intent for any purification. Babli Ḥulin31a.. Rebbi Eleazar in the name of Rebbi Ḥanina, she is impure both for her house and purities. What is the reason? It should be washed a second time and will be pure102Lev. 15:59, about impurity of textiles. The remark “a second time” is taken as indication that the second washing has to follow the rules of the first; Babli Ḥulin31b. A different interpretation in Sifra Tazria` Pereq 16(11). Since the first time it was intentionally, also the second time it must be intentionally. And from where that the first time it was intentionally? The Cohen has to order that they should wash103Lev. 13:54.. Intentionally. And we see that rabbis are early for intercalations. Rav Naḥman in the name of Rebbi Mana: It is an obligation to be early, to hasten in commandments104This refers to something completely different in the rules of Sabbath observation. Rebbi Naḥman requires the husband to direct his household to light Sabbath lights, and therefore begin the observance of the Sabbath, somewhat before the time of sundown since in the fulfilling of divine commandments one has to show eagerness. As an example it is noted that the rabbis who form the court which decrees intercalations always arrive early for the deliberations. This is a commentary on the last statement of the last Mishnah in Chapter Šabbat2..
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy