Talmud su Levitico 15:24

It was stated: For the 24 hours which were stated, one suspends but one does not burn⁴⁰If heave was declared “impure” because a woman had handled it within 24 hours of her menstrual impurity, it cannot be burned as impure heave since the declaration was purely precautionary; the woman might have been impure when touching the heave. Since it is forbidden to destroy pure sanctified food, that heave neither can be destroyed, for perhaps it is pure, nor be used, for perhaps it is impure. It has to be left unused until it spoils, is no longer food, and automatically loses its sanctified status.. Rebbi Ze‘ira enjoyed this [because] he found stated⁴¹Tosephta 9:6,5; Babli 6a, both in slightly different formulation.: “A woman who detects a stain⁴²She detects a blood stain on her garment. This is proof that she bled sometime but she does not know when. makes impure retroactively⁴³The retroactivity extends all the time back until either the time when the woman had checked herself or the garment had been washed.. What does she make impure? Food, and drinks, and seats, and beds⁴⁴By Lev. 15:20–23, any seat or couch used by a menstruating woman becomes a source of original impurity. The impurity of food is not mentioned in the verses; it is only secondary (cf. Note 36). The original impurity of beds and seats induced retroactively is also asserted in the Babli, 5b.; her count is in disorder⁴⁵By tradition, denied by Sadducees, there are 11 days after the end of seven days of a menstrual period in which no new menses are possible, in which any bloody discharge cannot be menstrual but must follow the rules of zava. But if the start of the period is unknown, the count is impossible and any discharge triggers a seven day menstrual period., and she makes her sex partner impure retroactively⁴⁶Since her impurity was unknown to her.. A woman who detects blood makes impure retroactively⁴⁷In Tosephta and Babli: For 24 hours. The Yerushalmi probably assumes the validity of the Sages’ statement in Mishnah 1.. What does she make impure? Food, and drinks, and seats, and beds; her count is not in disorder⁴⁸She counts from the moment she notices the discharge., and she does not make her sex partner impure retroactively. Rebbi Aqiba says, she makes her sex partner impure retroactively. In both cases⁴⁹Stain or blood., one suspends but one does not burn.” There⁵⁰In Babylonia. This statement is missing in the Geniza text., they say: For the 24 hours which were stated, her bed is like her touch⁵¹Since her touch creates only derivative impurity, her seat and bed also do not become sources of original impurity.. How? Like one who sleeps with a menstruating woman⁵²Lev. 15:24 declares the man and his seat or bedding as impure but refrains from declaring seat and bedding as sources of original impurity. who does not make impure by moving⁵³Lev. 15:6 is interpreted that the male sufferer of gonorrhea imparts impurity to anything he moves, even if he never touches it. By biblical standards, a clay vessel cannot become impure by being touched from the outside; it becomes impure only by an original impurity inside its cavity. If a clay vessel has a cover fastened to it, it also cannot become impure by the impurity of the dead. But if either a (male or female) sufferer from gonorrhea or a menstruating woman indirectly moves a clay vessel, for example moving a wooden plank (in itself impervious to impurity) on which there is a closed clay vessel, that vessel and its contents become impure. and does not make clay vessels impure. It was found stated: He makes clay vessels impure by moving⁵⁴In the Tosephta (Note 41) this is asserted for both cases of menstrual impurity. The baraita quoted here disproves the earlier statement which denied the possibility of impurity by moving.. For the 24 hours which were stated, what is the status of what she touches in the public domain⁵⁵A general rule states that a doubt about matters of impurity in a public domain can be disregarded (cf. Note 9). The question is, if a woman had certainly touched something in the public domain within 24 hours of her menstruation, is this counted as a doubt or not?? Let us hear from the following⁵⁶A related text in Tosephta 3:8.: Pregnant and nursing women are pure for their husbands⁵⁷They are not supposed to menstruate., as is a woman with a regular period⁵⁸Except close to her time.. And all other women⁵⁹Excluding pre-puberty girls and post-menopausal women. There are not many women left in this category of “others”. are pure for sexual relations but impure in their touch⁶⁰Since at any time they could induce retroactive impurity.. That means, what she certainly touched in the public domain is impure.

Ben Bathyra explained⁹⁹One returns to the discussion of Mishnah 1, explaining why the High Priest has to live in the Temple precinct for seven days prior to the Day of Atonement. Babli 6a, Tosephta 1:1.: Perhaps he would sleep with his menstruating wife and be pushed away all of seven days¹⁰⁰Lev. 15:24.. But are Israel suspected about menstruating women¹⁰¹Is not Ben Bathyra’s explanation an insult to the High Priest? If this Ben Bathyra is the early Tanna (and not the later R. Jehudah ben Bathyra to whom the statement is attributed in the Babli), his argument might be an anti-Sadducee statement, since Sadducees and Pharisees accused one another of sleeping with menstruating women by following their sectarian interpretation of the biblical law; cf. Niddah 4:1 Note 3 (SJ 34).? Following what was stated there¹⁰²Mishnah Ševuˋot 2:5, Notes 80,81.: “If he was having sex with a pure one and she said to him, I became impure, if he separates immediately he is liable, for his separation is as pleasurable to him as his entry¹⁰³If the wife becomes impure during intercourse, if then he stops moving immediately and separates after the erection has disappeared, he touched an impure woman, has to immerse himself in a miqweh, and becomes totally pure at the next sundown. But if he separates while still with erection, he had intercourse with a menstruating woman and is severely impure for seven days. Ben Bathyra’s argument presupposes that the High Priest is an ignoramus..” You have to say that he who transmits the statement of Rebbi Joḥanan needs that of Ben Bathyra, and he who transmits the statement of Rebbi Joḥanan needs that of Ben Bathyra. If Rebbi Joḥanan had said but not Ben Bathyra, we would have said that he may have sex but sleep in the Palhedrin lodge; therefore one needs that of Ben Bathyra. If Ben Bathyra had said but not Rebbi Joḥanan , we would have said, let him not have sex but he may sleep in his house; therefore one needs that of Rebbi Joḥanan , and one needs that of Ben Bathyra.

“What is the positive commandment about the menstruating woman?” Rebbi Abin said, Keep the Children of Israel away from their impurities⁷⁰Lev. 15:31. The verse continues: Lest they die in their impurities when they defile My abode which is in their midst. This is the positive commandment not to defile the Temple. The verse concludes the chapters on impurities created by the human body (childbirth, skin diseases, male and female venereal diseases, menstruation, and sexual relations with a menstruating woman). Therefore it also is the positive commandment regarding the menstruating woman and is interpreted to forbid sexual relations with a woman close to the expected onset of her menses. The question about the woman experiencing a discharge during sex must refer to an unexpected event. Babli Ševuot 18b, most of the paragraph.. Rebbi Jonathan sent to ask Rebbi Simeon ben Rebbi Yose bar Lakonia, from where a warning for one having sex with an impure woman? He wanted to throw a stone after him; he told him, you are asking me something that children recite every day in the synagogue⁷¹Serving as elementary school under the system of compulsory elementary education instituted by Joshua ben Gamla.: To a woman in the separation ofher impurity you shall not come near to uncover her nakedness⁷²Lev. 18:19.. He answered him, that is not my problem. My only problem is rather “if he was having sex with an impure woman, he is liable. If he was having sex with a pure one and she said to him, I became impure,” if he separates immediately, is he liable⁷³As the Babli explains, interrupting the coition during an erection is pleasurable for the male and therefore forbidden under the circumstances. The end of the erection must precede the separation.? He told him, I and you have the same problem. Let us go out and learn. They went out and heard the voice of a Tanna who stated following Ḥiskiah: If lying a man will lie with her⁷⁴Lev. 15:24.. Not only that if he was having sex with an impure woman, he is liable. If he was having sex with a pure one and she said to him, I became impure, if he separates immediately, is he liable? The verse says, her secretion shall be⁷⁴Lev. 15:24., even if her secretion starts⁷⁵The rabbinic expression for the onset on the menses is פִּרֵס נִידָּה, “breaking through”. with him. What should he do? Rav Hoshaia, Rav Jehudah in the name of Samuel, he shall cool down. If he did not cool down? Rebbi Yose said, for him I am reading do not come near⁷²Lev. 18:19. as “do not separate”. Closeness is separation. Rav Ḥuna in the name of Rav Abba: Those who say, be close to yourself, do not touch me for I sanctified you⁷⁶Is. 65:5. Also in the Babli the verse is quoted in support of the interpretation of the root קרב as “to separate”.. Rebbi Zeˋira said, he should imagine that a sword is cutting into his flesh. Is everybody Rebbi Zeˋira? Rebbi Tanḥuma in the name of Rav Ḥuna: He shall press his fingertips on the wall, then he will cool down⁷⁷Babli Ševuot 18a..