Talmud su Levitico 16:12

If he slaughtered and died⁷⁹Lev. 16:3 requires that Aaron come to the sanctuary with a bull. R. Simeon ben Laqish reads the verse as implying that any other Cohen cannot use his bull’s blood. All other authorities read the same verse as permitting the blood to another Cohen, as explained at the end of the paragraph.. May the other⁸⁰This is the late Amora usually called R. Ḥinena. Babli 49a. enter with his blood. Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish said, with a bull, but not with its blood⁸¹Presuming that somehow the incense did not become impure by the impurity of the dead, may the replacing Cohen use the first’s fistful even though his own fist probably is of different size?. Rebbi Ḥanina and Rebbi Jonathan both are saying, even with the blood. The word of Rebbi Joshua ben Levi implies even with the blood. For Rebbi Ḥanina⁸²Lev. 16:12. For the blood it is not written “the blood which he collected”; therefore the blood is transferable., Rebbi Abba in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan , even with the blood. Rebbi Joshua ben Levi asked, if he took a fistful and then died, may one enter with his fistful⁸³Discussion of Mishnah 5.? Why does he question his fistful? For it is written, his fistful⁸Lev. 16:8., but here it is not written “his blood”⁴Standing between the two he-goats, the lot in his right hand is put on the he-goat to his right, and the one in his left on the he-goat to his left side.. It is obvious for him, even with the blood.

Fine¹³⁸Lev. 16:12.. What does the verse say? Because it was said, you shall pulverize it finely¹³⁹Ex. 31:36. If the entire year the incense must be a fine powder, what does the remark mean that on the Day of Atonement it be fine?. Then why is it said, fine? That it be most fine. What does he do? He separates the mina on the Eve of the Day of Atonement and returns it to the mortar to fill from it his fistful to observe “most fine.¹⁴⁰Babli 45a, Keritut_6b.”

From where the arrangement of the Day of Atonement¹⁵⁶That the wood on the altar has to be prepared specially for the requirements of the day and therefore needs an extra arrangement, in addition to the daily ones.? Rebbi Jeremiah in the name of Rebbi Pedat: Coals¹⁵⁷Lev. 16:12.. Why does the verse say, of fire? That it should be insignificant on its coals. ¹⁵⁸Sifra Aḥare Pereq 3(5); Babli Pesaḥim 75b.. The following text is Tannaitic, not of the sayings of R. Jeremiah. It is missing in a Genizah fragment (Ginzberg, p. 118) and therefore may be a later addition. This explains the reduplication of the argument.“Coals, I could think smouldering; the verse says of fire. If of fire, I could think flames; the verse says coals of fire, from those crackling ones. And from where that the fire should be insignificant on the coals? The verse says, coals of fire.”