Talmud su Levitico 18:15

Rav said⁹⁵In the Babli, 21b, this is reported as a Galilean statement which is rejected because it is not valid in all cases.: In all cases where the female is forbidden by the Torah, the wife of the corresponding male is forbidden. The father’s sister is forbidden as female; the wife of the father’s brother, the corresponding male, is forbidden⁹⁶Both cases are biblical, Lev. 18:12,14. It seems that Rav claims biblical status for his statement.. The mother’s sister is forbidden as female⁹⁷Lev. 18:13. The second case is a secondary prohibition.; the wife of the mother’s brother, the corresponding male, is forbidden His son’s daughter is forbidden as female⁹⁸Lev. 18:17.; the wife of his son’s son, the corresponding male, is forbidden His daughter’s daughter is forbidden as female⁹⁸Lev. 18:17.; the wife of his daughter’s son, the corresponding male, is forbidden Rebbi Jacob the Southerner said before Rebbi Yose, there are another two. His mother is biblical⁹⁹Lev. 18:7.. His mother’s mother is secondary to her. They forbade his father’s mother because of his mother’s mother¹⁰⁰She is in the list of secondary prohibitions. As the Babli notes, 21b, in general one does not admit fences around fences of the law (cf. Note 72), so without Rav’s rule, she should be permitted. The Babli has a special explanation for the prohibitions, because grandmother and grandfather are called grand mother and grand father by the grandchildren, which gives them status of father and mother. The Yerushalmi disagrees and holds that there is never a fence for a fence of the law. In the next paragraph one proves the biblical prohibition of some so-called secondaries.. His son’s wife is biblical¹⁰¹Lev. 18:15.. His son’s son’s wife is secondary to her. They forbade his daughter’s son’s wife because of his son’s son’s wife. Rebbi Mattaniah said, there are another two. His father’s wife is biblical¹⁰²Lev. 18:8.. His paternal grandfather’s wife is secondary to her. They forbade his maternal grandfather’s wife because of his paternal grandfather’s wife. His father’s paternal brother’s wife is biblical¹⁰³Lev. 18:14. It was stated in Halakhah 1:1 that “brother” means “paternal brother”.. His father’s maternal brother’s wife is secondary to her. They forbade his mother’s maternal halfbrother’s wife because of his father’s maternal brother’s wife.

From where the warning¹²⁹A prohibition the penalty for which is not spelled out carries a penalty of flogging (Deut. 25:21). For any more serious infraction the pentateuchal style requires that separate verses must spell out (1) the prohibition, (2) the penalty to be imposed by the court, (3) the penalty imposed by Heaven in case the crime was not observed by two blameless adult male witnesses and, therefore, no court case was possible. In case of sexual crimes this would mean that the witnesses have to see the sex act. For a civil case, such as a husband wishing to divorce his wife because of her adultery, without paying her ketubah, it is enough for witnesses to testify to her going to a room with another man, locking the door, and extinguishing the lights. But this is not enough for a criminal conviction. for a person having sexual relations with his daughter-in-law? Your daughter-in-law’s nakedness you shall not uncover.¹³⁴Lev. 18:15. From where extirpation? For any man who would commit any of these abominations will be extirpated,^131,Lev. 18:29.¹³⁵The verse is slightly misquoted. etc. Punishment from where? A man who would sleep with his daughter-in-law¹³⁶Lev. 20:12. etc.