Talmud su Levitico 6:9
וְהַנּוֹתֶ֣רֶת מִמֶּ֔נָּה יֹאכְל֖וּ אַהֲרֹ֣ן וּבָנָ֑יו מַצּ֤וֹת תֵּֽאָכֵל֙ בְּמָק֣וֹם קָדֹ֔שׁ בַּחֲצַ֥ר אֹֽהֶל־מוֹעֵ֖ד יֹאכְלֽוּהָ׃
E ciò che rimane di ciò dovrà mangiare Aaronne e i suoi figli; sarà mangiato senza lievito in un luogo santo; nella corte della tenda dell'incontro la mangeranno.
Jerusalem Talmud Yevamot
HALAKHAH: “Fifteen [categories of] women free their co-wives”, etc. 13Sifra Ṣaw Parashah 2(9–10); another version of 2(10) in Babli Yebamot 39b. The basis of the argument is the 12th exegetical rule of R. Ismael [Introduction to Sifra (2)]: If anything was in some set and was removed from it for another purpose, you cannot return it to that set unless the verse returns it explicitly. See Midraš Gen.rabba 85(6) for a formulation of 2(10) referring more directly to the rule. (For an introduction to these rules, see H. Guggenheimer, Logical Problems in Jewish Tradition, in: Confrontations with Judaism, Ph. Longworth, ed., London 1966, pp. 171–196; Über ein bemerkenswertes logisches System aus der Antike, Methodos 1951, pp. 150–161.) What exactly was permitted, became forbidden, and is now commanded is a matter of interpretation in the next paragraphs. It is written14Lev. 6:9, speaking of the leftovers of cereal offerings in the Tabernacle. These leftovers must be eaten by priests, in the holy precinct, and unleavened, after the prescribed rites were performed. “unleavened it must be eaten”. Since it was permitted15Before dedication as offering, the flour was profane and permitted to everybody. It is in the set of unrestricted permitted food. and then forbidden16After dedication and before the prescribed rites were performed, the flour is forbidden to everybody, including priests. It is no longer in any set of permitted food., when it became permitted again17After the prescribed rites were performed, it cannot return to the set of unrestricted permitted food. should one think it returned to its prior permission? The verse states “unleavened it should be eaten” as commandment. Similarly, “her levir shall come upon her” as a commandment. Since she was permitted and then forbidden, when she became permitted again should one think she returned to her prior permission18A rhetorical question; this is impossible by rule 12.? The verse states “her levir shall come upon her” as commandment.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jerusalem Talmud Challah
146Tosephta Ḥallah 2:7–9, Babli Baba Qama 110b, Ḥulin 132b, Sifry Qoraḥ #119 (“12 in the Temple, 12 in the countryside”), Midrash Tanḥuma Bemidbar 24, Num. rabba 5(1).24 gifts were given to Aaron and his sons, ten in the Temple, four in Jerusalem, and ten in the countryside. These are the ten in the Temple: Purification offering147Lev. 6:19., reparation offering148Lev. 7:7., public well-being offerings149Lev. 23:19. Even though this sacrifice is labelled “well-being offering”, being a public offering it is treated as most holy and must be eaten by Cohanim in the Temple precinct., purification offering of a bird150While there is no separate verse commanding that the purification offering of a bird must be eaten, since the burnt offering of a bird is consumed on the altar it follows that the purification offering must be eaten., the reparation offering for suspected guilt151Lev5:17–18., the log of oil of the skin-diseased152Lev 14:10,21. The unused part of the oil becomes property of the Cohen., the two breads153Lev. 23:17., the shew-bread154Lev. 24:9., the remainders of cereal offerings155Lev. 2:3, 6:9–11., and the ‘omer156Lev. 23:10–11.. These are in Jerusalem: Firstlings157While these are sacrifices, after the blood was sprinkled on the altar wall the animal was eaten by the Cohen and his family anywhere in the city., First Fruits158Cf. Mishnah Bikkurim 3:10., what was lifted from thanksgiving sacrifices and from the nazir’s ram159In fact, any part lifted for the Cohen from any well-being sacrifice is for the Cohen and his entire family, to be eaten outside the Temple precinct. Cf. Lev. 7:34, Num. 18:11., and the skins of sacrifices160Only of most holy sacrifices (burnt, purification, and reparation offerings); Lev. 7:8.. These are in the countryside: Heave, Heave of the Tithe, ḥallah, foreleg, jawbone, and first stomach127Deut. 18:3., the first shearing161Deut. 18:4., robbery of the proselyte162Num. 5:8. It is assumed that the only person without legal heirs is the proselyte who had no children after his conversion., redemption of the firstborn163Ex. 13., redemption of the firstborn donkey163Ex. 13., ḥērem-dedications, and fields of inheritance164Dedicated and not redeemed; Lev. 27:16–21..
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy