신명기 15:21 해설: Rashi, Chizkuni, Ibn Ezra & Rav Hirsch

וְכִֽי־יִהְיֶ֨ה ב֜וֹ מ֗וּם פִּסֵּ֙חַ֙ א֣וֹ עִוֵּ֔ר כֹּ֖ל מ֣וּם רָ֑ע לֹ֣א תִזְבָּחֶ֔נּוּ לַיהוָ֖ה אֱלֹהֶֽיךָ׃

그러나 그 짐승이 흠이 있어서 절거나 눈이 멀었거나 무슨 흠이 있든지 네 하나님 여호와께 잡아 드리지 못할지니

Rashi

מום [AND IF THERE BE] ANY BLEMISH [THEREIN, IF IT BE LAME, OR BLIND, OR HAVE ANY ILL BLEMISH, THOU SHALT NOT SACRIFICE IT …] — any blemish is a general statement,
랍비에게 질문하기BookmarkShareCopy

Chizkuni

כל מום רע, “any serious blemish;” for instance the offering to G-d as a sacrifice if it was born with a serious (permanent) blemish. (Sifri)
랍비에게 질문하기BookmarkShareCopy

Ibn Ezra

any serious defect which have been enumerated [Leviticus 22: 22 ff].
랍비에게 질문하기BookmarkShareCopy

Rashi

פסח או עור LAME OR BLIND is a particularization,
랍비에게 질문하기BookmarkShareCopy

Rashi

כל מום רע ANY ILL BLEMISH — it again comprises them in a general statement. How is it with the blemishes particularised? They have the characteristic that each is a visible (external) blemish and the animal never returns naturally to its original condition (i.e. never becomes free from the blemish). So, too, the general statement includes all such blemishes that are visible and incurable [while in the case of a transitory blemish the animal may be sacrificed when the blemish has disappeared] (Bekhorot 37a; cf. Sifrei Devarim 126:2).
랍비에게 질문하기BookmarkShareCopy