이사야 5:19의 유대 사상

הָאֹמְרִ֗ים יְמַהֵ֧ר ׀ יָחִ֛ישָׁה מַעֲשֵׂ֖הוּ לְמַ֣עַן נִרְאֶ֑ה וְתִקְרַ֣ב וְתָב֗וֹאָה עֲצַ֛ת קְד֥וֹשׁ יִשְׂרָאֵ֖ל וְנֵדָֽעָה׃ (ס)

그들이 이르기를 그는 그 일을 속속히 이루어 우리로 보게 할 것이며 이스라엘의 거룩한 자는 그 도모를 속히 임하게 하여 우리로 알게 할 것이라 하는도다

Akeidat Yitzchak

In the case of Jeremiah and Chananyah, the situation was that the former had warned that unless the people repented they would fall victim to Nebuchadnezzar; Chananyah, on the other hand, without denigrating the value of repentance, promised that the grandeur of Jerusalem would be restored. This put Jeremiah in an excellent position. Should his own prophecy not be fulfilled, he could argue that the people's repentance had borne fruit, and that G'ds decree to destroy Jerusalem had been cancelled. However, Chananyah,- in the event that he would be proved wrong,- could hardly argue that as a reward for the people's repentance G'd had brought on destruction. In this sense the competition between the two men was unique in history. (see chapter twenty eight) Chananyah died within two months, in order to give the people a chance to profit by his death and do penitence. In chapter 28,8-9, Jeremiah makes it clear that in the past the authentic nature of a prophet's message was proven when the good he had predicted had materialised. He thus had ample precedent for what he proclaimed now as the even habochen, the yardstick.
랍비에게 질문하기BookmarkShareCopy