창세기 3:20의 유대 사상

וַיִּקְרָ֧א הָֽאָדָ֛ם שֵׁ֥ם אִשְׁתּ֖וֹ חַוָּ֑ה כִּ֛י הִ֥וא הָֽיְתָ֖ה אֵ֥ם כָּל־חָֽי׃

아담이 그 아내를 하와라 이름하였으니 그는 모든 산 자의 어미가 됨이더라

HaEmunot veHaDeot

Translation:
랍비에게 질문하기BookmarkShareCopy

HaEmunot veHaDeot

The second objection is that the One who has the ability to perform resurrection has not promised to do so. However, I found that He indeed promised this in many places in the Scriptures. Even though it is possible to interpret these promises in various ways so that they refer to matters other than the resurrection of the dead, I do not see that reason compels us to reject the apparent meaning of these texts. This is because we, the people of Israel, believe that everything written in the books of the prophets should be understood according to its plain meaning and the meaning of its words—except in cases where this apparent meaning leads to one of four outcomes: 1. Contradicting sensory evidence, as in the verse about Eve (Genesis 3:20), “She was the mother of all living.” 2. Contradicting reason, such as the statement (Deuteronomy 4:24), “For the Lord your God is a consuming fire.” 3. Contradicting another written text, such as the verse (Malachi 3:10), “Test Me, please, in this,” after it has been written (Deuteronomy 6:16), “Do not test the Lord your God.” 4. Contradicting a tradition accepted by our ancestors, such as the verse (Deuteronomy 25:3), “Forty lashes he may give him, but not more,” when our Sages taught that the number is thirty-nine.
랍비에게 질문하기BookmarkShareCopy