시편 34:15 미드라쉬: Midrash Tehillim, Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Ein Yaakov & Devarim Rabbah

“Who does not walk in the counsel of the wicked” (Psalms 1:1). Rabbi Shimon ben Pazi said, “And since he didn’t walk with them, where did he stand [with them]? And since he didn’t stand [with them] where did he sit [with them]? And since he didn’t sit [with them] where did he scoff [as they did]? Rather, [this comes] to teach you that if he walked [with them,] his end will be to stand [with them], and if he stood [with them,] his end will be to scoff, and if he scoffed, Scripture speaks of him [when it says]: “If you are a scoffer, your bear it alone” (Proverbs 9:12) [i.e., you may have scoffed as a result of peer-pressure, but in the end, you have to bear the responsibility on your own.] This comes to teach us that a good deed leads to another good deed, and a transgression [leads to another transgression]. And since he neither walked, nor stood, nor sat [with the wicked], you might [come to think] that he would neither do good nor bad, but [simply] put his hand upon his mouth. [Therefore, the psalm continues] to teach us, “but his delight is in the Torah of God” (Psalms 1:2). Rabbi Berechia said, “What is the verse coming to tell us [when it says], “Don’t be overly wicked” (Ecclesiastes 7:1)? That [it’s perfectly fine if we’re only] a little bit wicked?! Rather, [it means] if you’ve been wicked [already], don’t add to [what you’ve done]. Rabbi Shimon bar Yocahi says, if a person sat and didn’t transgress [any laws,] he is rewarded as if he did a good deed. Rabbi Zeira said, that this [only applies in a case where an opportunity to sin] came to him and he was saved from it [by his own resilience and will-power]. As it is said, “Depart from evil and do good” (Psalms 34:15; 37:27) — depart from evil in order to do good; and similarly, it is said, “they have never fallen into iniquity, in His ways they have walked” (Psalms 119:3) [which implies that, merely by not having fallen into iniquity, they are counted as if they have walked in God’s ways]. A sage of the academy of Rabbi Yehoshua ben Karcha says that the twenty instances of the word אשרי [meaning blessed, or happy] in the book of Psalms correspond to the twenty instances of הוי [which is an expression of dismay] in the book of Isaiah. Rabbi [Yehuda Ha-Nassi] said, “I am perplexed [by this]! How could Rabbi Yehoshua teach us that אשרי is written twenty times? And I say [that it is written] twenty-two times. Why? Corresponding to the twenty-two letters [of the alphabet]. And about them [David] said, “May the words of my mouth [and the prayer of my heart be acceptable to you, Oh Lord, my rock and my redeemer]” (Psalms 19:15). They should be made [relevant] for the generations, and written for the generations, and inscribed for the generations. And those who read them shouldn’t be like those who read [words] in a book. Rather, they should read them and take reward [for reading] them, [like the reward one receives from learning the most difficult tractates of Mishna, such as] Negaim and Oholot. “May the words of my mouth [and the prayer of my heart] be acceptable.” “Oh, that I might dwell in your tent forever, [take refuge under Your protecting wings.]” (Psalms 61:5). [This verse uses a word for “forever” that can also mean “worlds.”] But could it enter your mind that David would have requested to reside in two worlds [in heaven and on earth]? Rather, this is what David said: May they [continue] to recall me [by reading my Psalms] in houses of prayer, and in study halls, [even after I have passed on to the next world, such that it should be] as if I were alive and well in two worlds.

R. Chelbo in the name of R. Huna further said: "He who knows that his friend is accustomed to greet him, shall try to greet him first, for it is said (Ps. 34, 15.) Seek peace and pursue it, and when one responds not to a greeting he receives, he is to be called robber, as it is said (Is. 3, 14.) But ye who have eaten up the vineyard; the plunder of the poor is in your houses." [What have the poor that they were plundered of? Nothing but their greeting.]

(Fol. 40) Raba raised the following objection before R. Nachman: "We are taught in a Mishnah, these are the things of which a man enjoys the interest for his reward in this world, while the principal remaineth for him in the world to come. They are: honoring his father and mother, the practice of loving kindness, hospitality, making peace between man and his associates, and above all the study of the Torah. Concerning honoring father and mother, it is written (Deut. 5. 16) In order ihat thy days may be prolonged, and in order that it may go well with thee; concerning loving kindness it is written (Pr. 21, 21) He that pursueth righteousness and kindness will find life, righteousness and honor; and concerning bringing peace, it is written (Ps. 34, 15) Seek peace and pursue it. And R. Abahu explained that we infer this from the similar words R'dipha R'dipha (pursue); it is written here, seek peace and pursue it, (rod-phrhu); and again it is written (Pr. 21, 21) He that pursueth (rodeph) righteousness and kindness will find life, righteousness and honor; [Hence both hare the same merits]. Concerning studying the Torah, it is written (Deut. 30, 20) For it (the Torah) is thy life, and the length of thy days. If so, tlien concerning the sending away of the bird, it is also written (Ib. 22, 7) in order that it may be well with thee, and that thou mayest live many days. Then why did not the Mishnah count this also? "The Tanna left it out," [was R. Nachman's reply]. Is this then possible, since our Tannah states: "These are the things." How can you say he left something unmentioned?" Therefore said Raba: "R. Idi explained this to me [with the following verse]: (Is. 3, 10) Say it to the righteous, that he has done well; for the fruit of their deeds shall they eat. Is there then a righteous man that is good and a righteous man that is not good? We must therefore say that a righteous man who is good towards heaven and also towards man is a righteous that is good; who is good towards heaven but conducts himself badly towards man is a righteous man that is not good. Similar to this case (Ib., ib. 11) Woe unto the wicked who doth evil; for the recompense of his hands shall be bestowed on him. Are there then wicked who do evil and wicked who do not evil? We must therefore say that the wicked who act wickedly towards heaven and towards man, this is a wicked man who does evil; but a wicked man who acts wickedly towards heaven and not towards man, this is a wicked who doeth not evil." [Hence wherever the passage does not state for the fruit … shall they eat, it yields no fruit in this world]. Meritorious rewards have a capital and also the fruit bearing on the principal, as it is said Say it to the righteous that he hath done well; for the fruit, etc; while iniquities have merely principal but no fruit yielding, as it is said Woe unto the wicked who does evil, etc. If so, then how will the following passage (Pr. 1, 31) Therefore shall they eat of the fruit of their own way, and be filled with their own devices, be explained? This means that a crime which bears fruit [if it is carried out] it will also yield fruit [in the punishment], but a crime which bears no fruit [is not carried out] it will yield no fruit in the punishment. The merit of a good intention does the Holy One, praised be He! [in rewarding] add to that of a good deed, as it is said (Mal. 3, 16) Then conversed those that fear the Lord; one with another, and the Lord listened and heard it; and there was written a book of remembrance before Him, over those that feared the Lord and for those who respected His name. Said R. Assi: What does and for those who respected His name, mean? "Even when one intended to observe a commandment, but was incidentally prevented from doing so. Scripture credits him as if he had actually observed it." Bad intentions, the Holy One, praised be He, however, does not add to deeds, as it is said (Ps. 66, 18) If I had looked on wickedness with my heart, the Lord would not have heard. But how will the following passage (Jer. 6, 19) Behold, I will bring evil upon these people, the fruit of their thoughts, be explained? This means that an evil intention which bears fruit (is carried out), the Holy One, praised be He! adds to deeds; but such evil thoughts which bear no fruit, the Holy One, praised be He! does not add to deeds, but is there not a passage (Ez. 14, 5) In order that I may grasp the house of Israel by their heart? Said R. Acha b. Jacob: "The last passage refers to idolatry, for the master said elsewhere: The crime of idolatry is so severe that whoever denies it is as he admits the truthfulness of the entire Torah." Ulla said: "The last passage means as R. Huna explained it, for R. Huna said: 'As soon as a man commits a crime once, and twice, it becomes to him a privileged thing.' How can one think that it is a privilege? We must therefore say that it appears to him like a privileged thing." R. Abahu, in the name of R. Chanina, said: "It is preferable for a man to commit a transgression secretly, but not to profane Heaven's name," etc. [Fully explained in Volume 3, page 29].