에스더 2:10 미드라쉬: Midrash Tanchuma, Bamidbar Rabbah & Midrash Tanchuma Buber

R. Simeon the son of Gamliel declared: I was reared among the sages, and I discovered that there was nothing more beneficial for a person than silence.⁷Pirkei Avot 1:17. Rachel forced herself to remain silent, and her offspring continued the tradition of silence. She saw her gifts in her sister’s hand and remained silent. Her son Benjamin, whose stone in the high priest’s breastplate was a jasper, knew of the sale of Joseph and remained silent. The word jasper (yashfeh) may be read as “he has a mouth” (yesh peh) but nevertheless remains silent. Saul was descended from her: But concerning the matter of the kingdom, he told him not (I Sam. 10:16). Regarding Esther (another descendant) it is said: Esther had not made known her people nor her kindred (Est. 2:10).

(Numb. 5:13, cont.:) “And it is hidden from her husband's eyes,” [is to] exclude one who is blind.³⁹Sifre, Numb. 5:13 (7); Sot. 27a. Cf. Numb. R. 9:10, which explains the exception as referring to a husband just pretending to be blind to his wife’s adultery, so that he can use the rite of the bitter water for killing his wife. Another interpretation (of Numb. 5:13, cont.), “and it is hidden from her husband's eyes.” [These words mean to exclude the case in which] her husband saw [her transgression] and overlooked [it]. (Ibid., cont.:) “So that she is secluded.” We have not yet heard of a specific length of time for her to be in seclusion (with her lover) [in order to cause defilement]. R. Eleazer says, “[The time needed] for a palm tree to sway back.”⁴⁰See TSot. 1:2; Sot. 4a; Sifre, Numb. 5:13 (7). R. Joshua says, “For mixing the cup.” Ben 'Azzay says, “For drinking it.” R. Aqiva says, “For roasting an egg.” R. Judah says, “For eating three eggs one after the other.” R. Eleazar ben Pinhas says, “For a weaver⁴¹Gk.: gerdios. to knot the thread.”⁴²Gk.: nema. R. Hanin says, “For her to put her finger in her mouth.” Pelimo says, “For his (sic) hand⁴³Cf. the parallel in Numb. R. 9:10, which reads, “her hand.” to reach over the basket and take a loaf of bread. And even though there is no evidence for [this understanding], there is a hint [that it is correct], where it is stated (in Prov. 6:26), ‘For on behalf of a woman playing the harlot [one will be reduced] to a loaf of bread.’” (Numb. 5:13, cont.:) “And there is no witness against her.” Although she has no [witness against her] now, she will have one at another time.⁴⁴In addition to Numb. R. 9:10, see Gen. R. 38:14; PRK 18:3; PR 32:2. In a similar usage⁴⁵Kayyotse badavar. This repetitive use of kayyotse b… indicates that the sixth of the seven exegetical rules (middot) attributed to Hillel is being used here. you say (in Gen. 11:30), “Now Sarai was barren; she had no child.” Although [Sarai] had no [child] then, she would have one at another time, as stated (in Gen. 21:1), “Then the Lord visited Sarah […].” In a similar usage you say (in Esth. 2:10), “Esther had not disclosed her people [and her native land].” Although she had not disclosed them to him then, she did disclose them to him at another time, as stated (in Esth. 8:1), “then Mordecai came before the king, for Esther had disclosed what relationship he had to her.” And here also (in Numb. 5:13), “and there is no witness against her.” Although she has no [witness against her] now, she will have one at another time, as stated (in Mal. 3:5), “and I will be a swift witness [against sorcerers, against adulterers].” Our masters have said, “When a woman is alone with her husband and he is having sexual intercourse with her, if she sets her eyes on another at the time of [their] sexual intercourse, there is no greater adultery for her than this.⁴⁶Numb. R. 9:34. Thus it is stated (in Ezek. 16:32), “The adulterous woman [receives strangers] instead of her husband (literally: under her husband).” Is there a woman who commits adultery [while] under her husband?⁴⁷Cf. Numb. 5:19. It is simply that this is [the kind of woman] who encounters a certain man and sets her eyes on him. Then she has sexual intercourse with her husband while her heart is on him. [There is] a story about the king of the Arabs, who asked R. Aqiva, “I am black and my wife is black, but she has borne me a white son. Shall I kill her because she has played the harlot while under me?” He said to him, “Are the images within your house white or black?” He said to him, “White.” He said to him, “When you were busy with her, she set her eyes on the images and bore [a child] like them. Now if you are surprised over this matter, learn from the Jacob's flock. They were conceived from the sticks, as stated (in Gen. 30:39), ‘Since the flock conceived by the sticks, [the flock bore streaked, speckled, and spotted young].’” Then the king of the Arabs thanked R. Aqiva. Thus, when any woman is alone with her husband in holiness, in the end he produces righteous children from her. Thus we find it so in the case of Hannah, who was alone with her husband in holiness, and [so] the Holy One, blessed be He, did not deprive her of her reward. Rather he gave her a righteous son like Moses, as stated (in Jer. 15:1), “Even if Moses and Samuel stood before Me.” It also says (in Ps. 99:6), “Moses and Aaron were among His priests, and Samuel was among those who call upon His name.” So also did Hannah say (in I Sam. 1:27), “For this child did I pray, [and the Lord has granted me my petition].” Why? Because he was sown in holiness. The Holy One, blessed be He, said, “In this world I abhor all those peoples, because they are from unclean seed; but I have chosen you, because you are from true seed, as stated (in Jer. 2:21), ‘And I planted you as a choice vine, all of it from true seed.’ It is also written (in Deut. 7:6), ‘and the Lord your God has chosen you […].’ And also in the future to come I am choosing only you, because you are a holy seed, as stated (in Is. 65:23), ‘They shall not labor in vain, nor bear children in terror, because they are a seed blessed of the Lord, [and their offspring along with them].’”

Another matter: “And commit a trespass against him [umaala bo maal]” – a double trespass, as she committed a trespass against him regarding both his person and his money. She brought other people to take his money.²⁰The mamzer inherits from her husband even though he is not the husband's son. Another matter: “And commit a trespass against him [umaala bo maal]” – she committed trespass against him regarding males and females.²¹Male and female children who are mamzerim. “And commit a trespass against him [umaala bo maal]” – in this world and in the World to Come. She is separated from him in two worlds.
“And a man had lain with her carnally, and it was hidden from the eyes of her husband, and she was secluded and she was defiled, and there is no witness against her, and she was not coerced” (Numbers 5:13).
“And a man had lain” – with regard to a man he warns her, but he does not warn her with regard to an animal. “With her” – it is only the one whom he warned.²²If he has two wives and warned one of them not to seclude herself with a certain man, the other is not included in the warning, even if she heard it. “Carnally” – to the exclusion if he warned her regarding other limbs,²³Any form of physical contact other than sexual intercourse is not included in the laws addressing a sota. so you will not say that the verse made it contingent on the opposition of the husband, and the husband opposes.²⁴The laws addressing a sota apply only to sexual intercourse, even if the husband opposes his wife’s engaging in a different form of physical contact with another man. That is why it is stated: “Carnally.”
“It was hidden from the eyes of her husband” – but not if the husband sees and closes his eyes. That is, if the husband knew about her, he cannot engage in subterfuge in her regard and cause her to drink. “And she was secluded and she was defiled” – once she was secluded, the Torah characterizes her as defiled.
Another matter: “And she was secluded and she was defiled” – what is the minimum duration of seclusion [that causes her to be liable]? It is the duration of defilement. How long is defilement? It is the duration of intercourse. How long is intercourse? It is the duration of the initial stage of intercourse.²⁵Contact between the sexual organs. How long is the initial stage of intercourse? Rabbi Eliezer says: The duration of the return of a palm tree in the wind.²⁶The time it takes for a branch pushed by the wind to return to its initial position (Rashi, Sota 4a). Rabbi Yehoshua says: The duration of diluting a cup.²⁷Of wine. Ben Azai says: The duration of drinking it. Rabbi Akiva says: The duration of cooking an egg until it rolls. Rabbi Yehuda ben Beteira says: The duration of swallowing three rolled eggs one after another. Rabbi Elazar ben Pinḥas said: The duration that it takes a weaver to tie a severed string. Penimon says: The duration it takes for a woman to extend her hand and take a loaf from the basket. Even though there is no proof of the matter there is an allusion to the matter: “For due to a licentious woman one is brought to a loaf of bread, and an adulteress hunts a precious soul” (Proverbs 6:26). Rabbi Yosei said: All these measures are after removal of the lower undergarment.
Rabbi Yoḥanan said: Each and every one calculated based on his own experience. But did ben Azai ever take a wife? Some wish to say that he became aroused. Some wish to say that he engaged in relations and withdrew.²⁸He married but then continued life alone. Some wish to say: “The secret of the Lord is to those who fear Him; He informs them of His covenant” (Psalms 25:14).
From where is it derived that the first stage of intercourse renders a married woman forbidden [to her husband]? Rabbi Yona said: As it is written: “For anyone who will perform any of these abominations…[will be excised from among their people]” (Leviticus 18:29). All the forbidden relations were likened to the menstruant. Just as the menstruant, it²⁹The prohibition is violated. is with the first stage of intercourse [haaraa], as it is written: “He has probed [he’era] her source” (Leviticus 20:18), so too, all forbidden relations are with the first stage of intercourse.
“And there is no witness [ve’ed] against her” – one that is fit to testify. From where is it derived that even a witness who is not fit to testify, if he says that she was defiled, she does not drink? The verse states: “A witness, and a witness.”³⁰The vav prefix to the word witness [ed], comes to include even a witness unfit to testify.
“And she was not coerced” – she is forbidden, but if she was coerced, she is permitted. But you have an Israelite woman who was coerced and is forbidden. Which is that? It is anyone who began willingly but ended under coercion. And you have an Israelite woman who was not coerced and is permitted. It is anyone who began under coercion but ended willingly, like a certain woman who came to Rabbi and said: I was raped. He said to her: Was there no pleasure for you? She said to him: Were a person to dip his finger in honey and place it in your mouth on Yom Kippur, is it perhaps not bad for you even though ultimately it is pleasant for you? He accepted her response.³¹He ruled that she was permitted to her husband even though she felt pleasure.
Another matter: “And there is no witness against her” – even though there is not one in her regard now, there is one in her regard later. Similarly, it says: “Sarai was barren; she had no child” (Genesis 11:30) – even though she does not have now, she has later, as it is stated: “The Lord remembered Sarah as He had said, and the Lord did to Sarah as He had spoken” (Genesis 21:1). Similarly, it says: “Esther did not disclose her people or her birthplace, because Mordekhai had commanded her that she should not disclose it” (Esther 2:10) – even though she did not disclose it now, she disclosed it later.³²See Esther 7:3–4. Here too, “and there is no witness against her” – even though there is not one in her regard now, there is one in her regard later, as it is stated: “I will approach you in judgment, and I will be a swift witness…[and against the adulterers]” (Malachi 3:5).