신명기 24:5 관련 구절

From where that no betrothal is valid for a married woman? Rebbi Immi in the name of Rebbi Yannai: “She left his house, went, and became another man’s.¹³⁰Deut. 24:2.” When she leaves his house she may be with another. And from where that no betrothal is valid for incestual relations? Rebbi Tanḥuma in the name of Rav Huna: “She left his house, went, and became another man’s.” Why does the verse say “another”? To exclude the list of incest relations¹³¹In the Babli, Qiddušin 88b, this is quoted in the name of R. Yannai; there the argument is rejected as insufficient. Perhaps for “another” one should translate “an outsider”. The Babli always subsumes adultery under incest prohibitions and does not need a separate argument..

HALAKHAH: “Who became betrothed”. Not only a young man who married a young woman. From where even a young man who married a widow, a widower who married a young woman, a widower who married a widow? From where? The verse says, “a woman”, of any kind. Why does the verse say, “new”? That excludes him who remarries his divorcee¹⁸⁶Babli, 44a.. Rebbi Yose said, this implies that one who marries a sheram¹⁸⁷A woman without secondary female sex characteristics who is considered sterile; cf. Yebamot 1:1, Note 65. Her marriage has rabbinic status only. does not return since he has no religious obligation to live with her.