וְסָמַ֤ךְ יָדוֹ֙ עַל־רֹ֣אשׁ קָרְבָּנ֔וֹ וּשְׁחָט֕וֹ פֶּ֖תַח אֹ֣הֶל מוֹעֵ֑ד וְזָרְק֡וּ בְּנֵי֩ אַהֲרֹ֨ן הַכֹּהֲנִ֧ים אֶת־הַדָּ֛ם עַל־הַמִּזְבֵּ֖חַ סָבִֽיב׃
그 예물의 머리에 안수하고 회막문에서 잡을 것이요 아론의 자손 제사장들은 그 피를 제단 사면에 뿌릴 것이며
Jerusalem Talmud Chagigah
MISHNAH: Yose ben Yoezer110The pairs enumerated here were the joint heads of the Pharisaic leadership from Hasmonean to Herodian times, as enumerated in Avot, Chapter 1. says not to lean on111The verse requires that the owner of a well-being sacrifice lean with his hands on the animal before it is slaughtered (Lev. 3:2,7,13), but there is no indication that omission of the ceremony would in any way disqualify the sacrifice. By tradition, the owner has to push down on the animal with all his force. Doing this on a holiday is at least rabbinically forbidden as illegitimate use of an animal. Now it is explained in Eruvin Chapter 10 that most, but not all, rabbinic restrictions on Sabbath and holidays were disregarded in the Temple. The disagreement is whether the prohibition to push down on an animal is observed in the Temple for holiday sacrifices offered on a holiday or not., Yose ben Joḥanan says to lean on. Joshua ben Perahia says not to lean on, Matthew from Arbel says to lean on. Jehudah ben Tabbai says not to lean on, Simeon ben Shetah says to lean on. Shemaiah says to lean on, Avtalion says not to lean on. Hillel and Menaḥem did not disagree. Menaḥem left and Shammai entered; Hillel says to lean on, Shammai says not to lean on. The first ones were Patriarchs, the second Presidents of the Court.
Temurah
And how do we know this in the case of laying on of hands itself? — Three times the expression his offerings(Leviticus 3:1) is used: One [intimates that] ‘his offering’ [requires laying on of hands], but not that of a gentile. One [that] ‘his offering’, but not that of his fellow. And one ‘his offering’ but not his father's dedication.
Arakhin
What is the reason of R. Judah's view? — [Scripture says:] His offering,(Leviticus 1:3) i.e., but not his father's offering. And he infers the rule concerning the commencement of the dedication of the animal from the rule governing its end. Just as at the end of the dedication the heir does not lay on hands, thus also at the beginning he cannot effect a substitute.