민수기 3:11 탈무드 참조: Jerusalem Talmud Yevamot

Rebbi Bisna in the name of Rebbi Joshua ben Levi: A promiscuous priestly woman may eat tithe⁴⁴Since any Cohen is also a Levite (Deut. 18:1), he holds that even if a priestly woman loses her priestly status she is still levitic.. Is that not the Mishnah: “the daughter of a Cohen from heave,” this implies that she eats tithe. It may follow him who says that tithe is not given to Cohanim⁴⁵In that case, no statement about tithe is implied; cf. Ma‘aśer Šeni 5:9.. Rebbi Nasa said, the words of the rabbis disagree, since Rebbi Hila, Simeon ben Yosina, in the name of Rebbi Hoshaia said: If a Cohen came upon a divorcee, had a son from her, and died. [If the father died] within thirty days [of the son’s birth], the son must redeem himself. After thirty days, the presumption is that his father redeemed him⁴⁶The children of priests and Levites, as well as priestly or levitic women of good standing, are not redeemed (Num. 3:11–13). If the disabled son of a Cohen has to be redeemed, it follows that with the priestly he also lost the levitic status. This disproves R. Bisna’s statement.
In the Babli, Bekhorot 47b, there is a dissenting opinion that even if the father died before 30 days, the son does not have to give his redemption money to a Cohen since his father, being a Cohen, could not be sued for the money by other Cohanim. This does not change the validity of the argument given here.. If he redeems for others, certainly for his son.