신명기 6:9 탈무드 참조: Jerusalem Talmud Sukkah, Tractate Tefillin, Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin & Jerusalem Talmud Yoma

וּכְתַבְתָּ֛ם עַל־מְזוּזֹ֥ת בֵּיתֶ֖ךָ וּבִשְׁעָרֶֽיךָ׃ (ס)

또 네 집 문설주와 바깥 문에 기록할지니라

Jerusalem Talmud Sukkah

Now is a house which is very high not obligated to have a parapet, or to have a mezuzah12Since a sukkah is a temporary house, one has to understand why the rules for a sukkah should be different from those for a house; in particular why a sukkah can be called by this name only up to a height of 20 cubits (11m). Naturally, a sukkah needs no parapet (Deut. 22:8) since nobody can walk on its roof, and it needs no mezuzah(Deut. 6:9) since it is used only for 7 days and the obligation of mezuzah starts only with 30 days’ use.? But a house is roofed, a sukkah is not roofed13A house must be a permanent shelter which also protects against winter rains; this does not apply to the thin thatching covering a sukkah.. We find that thatching is like roofing, as we have stated there14Mishnah 1:10. Everywhere an empty space up to 3 hand-breadths width is disregarded (cf. Eruvin Chapter 1, Note 248). This also applies to houses., “if the thatching was three hand-breadths distant from the walls it is disqualified.” But a house is completely enclosed, a sukkah is not completely enclosed. If a porch15Greek ’εξέδρα ‘η, a covered walkway. Cf. Eruvin Chapter 1, Note 88. was totally open to the public domain, do not Rebbi Ila [in the name of]16Corrector’s addition. A comparison with the text in Eruvin(Chapter 1, Note 92) shows that it is unnecessary, and could have been replaced by a comma. Rav and Rebbi Joḥanan both say, one may carry in its entirety17While this is a well-defined space, it has no walls. In order to treat it by the rules of an alley one has to hold that the beams which form the frame for the roofing (which may be either a complete roof or simply lattice work) define virtual walls around the walkway. For the rules of the Sabbath, one should compare the porch to an enclosed alley, whose entry beam also cannot be higher than 20 cubits. The rule is waved for the porch.? What about it? Rebbi Abbahu in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan: The Torah said, in sukkot you shall dwell18Lev. 23:42.. Up to twenty cubits a person sits in the shade of the thatching; from twenty cubits and higher he sits in the shade of the walls. Rebbi Jonah said, that is, if you are saying, if it19The thatching. For him a low thatching in very high walls creates a qualified sukkah. is put higher than twenty cubits on the walls. But if it was put lower than twenty cubits inside the walls it is qualified. Rebbi Yose said to him, in your opinion, since you are saying that it is depending on the walls, it should state that “a sukkah which is higher than twenty cubits on the walls is disqualified.20R. Jonah’s explanation is rejected; the thatching must be on top of the walls.” Rebbi Abba in the name of Rav, if it only holds a person’s head, most of his body, and his table21A minimal sukkah has space for one person. Since they were taking dinner lying on couches, there must be room inside for that part ot the couch on which his head and body rest; the legs may be outside. In addition there must be a small table for the food. For any sukkah larger than this, the restriction in height is not valid. Accepted in the Babli, 2b.. But if it holds more it is qualified. Rebbi Jacob bar Aḥa in the name of Rebbi Joshia, only if its walls do not reach up all the way, but if its walls reach up all the way it is qualified. But does not a baraita disagree22Tosephta 1:1, Babli 2b.? “Rebbi Jehudah said, it happened that the sukkah of Queen Helena23Of Adiabene, who moved to Jerusalem as a widow. in Lydda was higher than twenty cubits and the Sages were coming and going there and nobody was saying a word. They said to him, because she was a woman, and a woman is not obligated24As a positive commandment tied to a specified time it does not apply to women, Mishnah Qiddušin1:7.. He said to them, is that a proof? Did she not have seven learned sons25It is spelled out in the Tosephta that they were sitting with their mother in her sukkah.?” Could you say that the sukkah of Queen Helena only held a person’s head, most of his body, and his table? But it must be that the walls do not reach up all the way. What Rebbi Josia said is reasonable and the baraita does not disagree, since it is the way of rich people to make their walls airy so that cool air may enter26Therefore it is accepted practice that the height restriction does not apply to a sukkah which is not minimal and whose thatching rests on the walls..
랍비에게 질문하기BookmarkShareCopy

Tractate Tefillin

The arm tefillin is placed on the upper part i.e. the biceps of the arm. So too “Between your Eyes” means on the upper part of the head and not literally “Between your Eyes”. “On your arm” and “Between your Eyes”. Just like “On your arm” means on the upper part of the arm, so too “Between your Eyes” means on the upper part of the head. How do we know tefillin is worn on the upper part of the hand? Like that that which Rabbi Eliezer Ben Yaakov says. Another derivation that the head tefillin must be on the upper part of the head and not literally “between your eyes”: Rabbi Yehuda says: It says “on your arm” and it says “between your eyes”. Just as “on your arm” is in a place which can be declared impure i.e. tzaras with a single symptom, so too “between your eyes” is in a place which can be declared impure with a single symptom. Another derivation that the head tefillin must be on the upper part of the head and not literally “between your eyes”: It says “Between your Eyes” and it says “Nor make any baldness between your eyes for the dead”. Just as baldness can only be in a place covered by hair so too tefillin is only placed in a place covered by hair. It says “You should write them” and it says “You should bind them”. The hand that writes is the hand that ties. i.e. one should tie the tefillin with the same hand he writes with, so it is put on the opposite hand to the one he writes with.
랍비에게 질문하기BookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin

79Similar texts are in Tanhuma Qorah 2 (Buber 4), Num. rabba 18(2), Midrash Prov. 11(27). Rav said, Koraḥ was an Epicurean. What did he do? He went and made togas completely of blue wool. He came before Moses and asked him, does a toga made completely out of blue wool need ṣiṣit? He answered, it is an obligation since it is written80Deut. 22:12. While from Num. 15:37–41 one might free a blue toga from exhibiting a blue thread, this verse makes it clear that a knotted appendage is needed.: braids you shall make for yourselves. Does a house full of Torah scrolls need a mezuzah? He answered, it needs a mezuzah since it is written81Deut. 6:9, 11:20., you shall write them on the door-posts of your house, etc. He asked him, what is the rule for a white spot the size of a bean82Lev. 13:18–23. By rabbinic interpretation, a white spot indicates skin disease only if it is at least the size of a Cilician bean.? He answered him, it is impure. If it spread over his entire body? He answered him, it is pure83Lev. 13:13.. At that moment, Koraḥ said that the Torah is not from Heaven, nor is Moses a [true]G prophet, nor Aaron a High Priest. 84Cf. Num. rabba 18(15), Midrash Prov. 11(27). Then Moses said, Master of all worlds! If a mouth of the earth had been created during the Six Days of Creation, it is fine. Otherwise it should be created now: If the Eternal would create a Creation85Num. 16:30..
랍비에게 질문하기BookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Yoma

프리미엄 회원 전용

Jerusalem Talmud Berakhot

프리미엄 회원 전용

Jerusalem Talmud Maasrot

프리미엄 회원 전용

Jerusalem Talmud Moed Katan

프리미엄 회원 전용

Jerusalem Talmud Sotah

프리미엄 회원 전용

Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin

프리미엄 회원 전용

Jerusalem Talmud Berakhot

프리미엄 회원 전용