Chasidut do Rodzaju 6:28
Noam Elimelech
And this is the explanation of the verse "And Hashem saw that the evil of the humans on earth was great" (Genesis 6:5), that is to say, at all times that one is on earth and one's evil is great, ["and all the humans' impulse of thought in their heart"] through that, also the one who wants to serve the Holy Blessed Name and does not do evil, even though one's thought reins that person in "only evil all day", "and Hashem nacham [had pity/regretted/consoled]" meaning, there was a consolation for the Blessed One in that a human could exert effort in front of the Blessed One, "that he made the humans", meaning, like the saying of our sages of blessed memory: "were it not for three verses etc " (Sukkah 52b and Berakhot 31a) and one of them is "that I made evil" (Micah 4:6) their hearts - that I gave them the impulse to evil. "And God was sad in his heart" - meaning, that the Holy Blessed name was sad due to the heart of the human, that God had given the human a heart of stone like that. "And Noach found favor" (Genesis 6:8) - meaning, that Noach was a tzadik and switched himself from the nature that makes humans likely to separate themselves from clinging to the Exalted Creator and strengthen oneself to cling to the Creator, and so [Noach] found favor, Noach with switching the letters becomes Chen, favor, which is him becoming favor in the Blessed Name's eyes.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Noam Elimelech
And this is the explanation of the verse "And Hashem saw that the evil of the humans on earth was great" (Genesis 6:5), that is to say, at all times that one is on earth and one's evil is great, ["and all the humans' impulse of thought in their heart"] through that, also the one who wants to serve the Holy Blessed Name and does not do evil, even though one's thought reins that person in "only evil all day", "and Hashem nacham [had pity/regretted/consoled]" meaning, there was a consolation for the Blessed One in that a human could exert effort in front of the Blessed One, "that he made the humans", meaning, like the saying of our sages of blessed memory: "were it not for three verses etc " (Sukkah 52b and Berakhot 31a) and one of them is "that I made evil" (Micah 4:6) their hearts - that I gave them the impulse to evil. "And God was sad in his heart" - meaning, that the Holy Blessed name was sad due to the heart of the human, that God had given the human a heart of stone like that. "And Noach found favor" (Genesis 6:8) - meaning, that Noach was a tzadik and switched himself from the nature that makes humans likely to separate themselves from clinging to the Exalted Creator and strengthen oneself to cling to the Creator, and so [Noach] found favor, Noach with switching the letters becomes Chen, favor, which is him becoming favor in the Blessed Name's eyes.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Genesis 6,3. Hashem.” We need to understand where and when G’d “appeared” to the patriarchs in His capacity as the G’d of Shaddai. We do not find the word וירא, “Shaddai appeared,” in connection with G’d’s addressing any of the patriarchs. Moreover, why did G’d speak of ידיעה, a form of intimate knowledge, in connection with His communicating with Moses and the Israelites at this time?
We have learned in Sifri, Mattot, 2 that all the prophetic revelations that subsequent prophets experienced were due to the residue of Moses’ prophetic experiences who had preceded them in this. In other words, no prophet was granted a type of vision that had not already been granted to Moses before him. Elaborating on that subject, we read in Yevamot 49, that all the subsequent prophets were only granted blurred visions whereas Moses had been granted clear visions.
It is not possible to absorb “clear” visions of the Creator unless the Creator had first garbed Himself in garments that diffuse the powerful light that emanates from Him. [Prophets of lesser stature than Moses would become too blinded by being exposed to G’d before he had thus screened Himself. Ed.] G’d “garbs” Himself in accordance to whom He dispenses His blessings, the most minimal of these “screens” within which He garbs Himself is known in the language of our sages as מאירה, literally, “illuminating” but in the sense of hiding the minimum possible. It is this “minimal” screen that hid G’d’s essence from Moses when He communicated with him. All the other prophets received their visions as derivatives of the visions which Moses had received. Although Moses himself “dispersed” some of his prophetic powers, [notably when the 70 elders were chosen to assist him, and he “dispersed” some of his holy spirit to them. (Numbers 11,17) Ed.]
We have learned in Sifri, Mattot, 2 that all the prophetic revelations that subsequent prophets experienced were due to the residue of Moses’ prophetic experiences who had preceded them in this. In other words, no prophet was granted a type of vision that had not already been granted to Moses before him. Elaborating on that subject, we read in Yevamot 49, that all the subsequent prophets were only granted blurred visions whereas Moses had been granted clear visions.
It is not possible to absorb “clear” visions of the Creator unless the Creator had first garbed Himself in garments that diffuse the powerful light that emanates from Him. [Prophets of lesser stature than Moses would become too blinded by being exposed to G’d before he had thus screened Himself. Ed.] G’d “garbs” Himself in accordance to whom He dispenses His blessings, the most minimal of these “screens” within which He garbs Himself is known in the language of our sages as מאירה, literally, “illuminating” but in the sense of hiding the minimum possible. It is this “minimal” screen that hid G’d’s essence from Moses when He communicated with him. All the other prophets received their visions as derivatives of the visions which Moses had received. Although Moses himself “dispersed” some of his prophetic powers, [notably when the 70 elders were chosen to assist him, and he “dispersed” some of his holy spirit to them. (Numbers 11,17) Ed.]
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Me'or Einayim
This shall be the Torah concerning the one struck with skin blanch [metzora] on the day he becomes clean. He shall be brought to the priest (Lev. 14:2), and our Sages of Blessed Memory interpreted metzora as one who speaks evil [motzi ra], for afflictions come through the sin of evil speech. But the matter is according to what is written, When God began to create etc. (Gen. 1:1), and our Sages of Blessed Memory interpreted: “For the sake of Torah and for the sake of Israel” (cf. Rashi, ad. loc.); so we find that Israel is something very important to Blessed God, since for their sake all of the Worlds and all the Creations were created. And Blessed God takes pleasure from each one of Israel, even from a greatly wicked person: “Your temples [rakatekh] are like a pomegranate (Song of Songs 6:7) – even the empty ones [reykanim] among you are as full of mitzvot as a pomegranate” (Babylonian Talmud, Berakhot 57a). And when a person speaks evil about one of Israel, even if he speaks truth, he nullifies the Blessed Creator’s pleasure (if it were possible) and causes Him sadness (if it were possible) as is stated, [And the Lord …] was saddened in to His heart (Gen. 6:6), and inverts the pleasure [oneg] into affliction [nega]; therefore his “wage” is measure for measure, affliction comes upon him. And our Sages of Blessed Memory said: “Evil speech is as great as idolatry, sexual immorality, and murder” (Babylonian Talmud, Arakhin 15b). But we must be precise: what connection does idolatry have to evil speech? But the matter is according to what is written, By the word of ADONAI were the heavens made (Psalm 33:6), that all of the Worlds and all of the Creations were created through speech comprised of the 22 letters of the Torah, which is called Heavenly Sovereignty. For when the Sovereign does not speak, no one knows how to do His Will; and when he speaks His Will is revealed, and that is Heavenly Sovereignty whose Sovereignty is in all jurisdictions. And we find in Sefer Yetzirah that [the letters] are established in the mouth, that Blessed God established the 22 letters: the World of Speech, Heavenly Sovereignty, the Attribute of ADONAI-ness, ADONAI, open my lips (Psalm 51:17), were established in the human mouth.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Genesis 6,9. “these are the generations of Noach;" there are two types of righteous people, both of whom serve the Lord. The first category does so with enthusiasm and profound devotion, but does so as an individual only, not endeavouring to draw other people, admitted sinners, nearer to their Creator.
There is a second category of tzaddik, righteous person, who not only serves the Lord himself, but who also is instrumental in leading sinners back to their Creator. Avraham was a prime example of the latter type of tzaddik. He was busy converting pagans to monotheism.
According to Ari’zal, Noach was even punished for not rebuking the pagans in his time; his punishment consisted of his soul being reincarnated in the body of Moses in order to accomplish then what it had failed to accomplish on its first round inside a human body. Moses made up for the sin of omission of Noach by constantly rebuking the Israelites for their shortcomings. When our sages in Kidddushin 40 discussed the difference between a צדיק, “a righteous individual,” and a צדיק טוב, “a good righteous individual,” they said that the former is righteous vis a vis G’d, whereas the latter is “righteous both vis a vis G’d, and vis a vis his fellow man.” Being “good” to one’s peers involves more than being helpful and charitable; it includes admonishing one’s neighbour when one observes him violating G’d’s commandments. According to Sanhedrin 99, teaching one’s neighbour’s son Torah is one of the most important ways in which to demonstrate one’s concern for him, so much so that a student who has been taught Torah by someone other than his biological father is deemed as having been sired by that teacher. In introducing Avraham to us, the Torah underlines (Genesis 12:5) that when heading for the land of Israel from Charan, Avraham and Sarah took with them את הנפש אשר עשו בחרן, “the souls they had acquired while in Charan”. (the converts to monotheism)
When the Torah refers to Avraham, it never wrote the line: אלה תולדות אברהם, as opposed to Genesis 6,9-10 where amongst the תולדות of Noach we are told about his three sons; there is no mention or allusion to any converts that Noach had attracted to monotheism other than his own flesh and blood. The word אלה, “these,” is almost always used as a limitation, i.e. “these and none other.” In Noach’s case, he had failed to “acquire souls.”
When we reflect on this we will understand why the Torah wrote ונח מצא חן בעיני ה', instead of ונח היה לו חן בעיני ה'. The latter formulation would mean that when Noach faced G’d he brought with him much to commend him, i.e. his converts, whereas the formulation the Torah uses implies that G’d had to go looking for Noach; indeed he was a valuable find, a צדיק תמים, a perfectly righteous man, but not one that could not be overlooked such as Avraham’s “Chassidim.”
When the Torah testifies that את האלוקים התהלך נח, “Noach walked with G’d,” this sounds as proof of Noach’s aloofness vis a vis his fellow man [at least during the 120 years prior to the deluge when he was busy building his ark. Ed.] He was in step with G’d, but out of step with his peers. This is why the Torah repeats once more (verse 10) that he sired three sons, although the Torah had informed us of this already at the end of the last chapter (Genesis 5:32).
Noach, though aware of the many sexual perversions practiced by the people around him, and being steadfast in not copying their behaviour, is attested to by the Torah describing him as תמים היה בדורותיו, “he was perfect in his time.” Nonetheless, his loyalty to the Creator certainly did not endear him to his peers, hence “he walked with G’d”, as there was no one else “with whom to walk.” Sadly, only G’d appreciated his self-restraint, his righteousness.
There is a second category of tzaddik, righteous person, who not only serves the Lord himself, but who also is instrumental in leading sinners back to their Creator. Avraham was a prime example of the latter type of tzaddik. He was busy converting pagans to monotheism.
According to Ari’zal, Noach was even punished for not rebuking the pagans in his time; his punishment consisted of his soul being reincarnated in the body of Moses in order to accomplish then what it had failed to accomplish on its first round inside a human body. Moses made up for the sin of omission of Noach by constantly rebuking the Israelites for their shortcomings. When our sages in Kidddushin 40 discussed the difference between a צדיק, “a righteous individual,” and a צדיק טוב, “a good righteous individual,” they said that the former is righteous vis a vis G’d, whereas the latter is “righteous both vis a vis G’d, and vis a vis his fellow man.” Being “good” to one’s peers involves more than being helpful and charitable; it includes admonishing one’s neighbour when one observes him violating G’d’s commandments. According to Sanhedrin 99, teaching one’s neighbour’s son Torah is one of the most important ways in which to demonstrate one’s concern for him, so much so that a student who has been taught Torah by someone other than his biological father is deemed as having been sired by that teacher. In introducing Avraham to us, the Torah underlines (Genesis 12:5) that when heading for the land of Israel from Charan, Avraham and Sarah took with them את הנפש אשר עשו בחרן, “the souls they had acquired while in Charan”. (the converts to monotheism)
When the Torah refers to Avraham, it never wrote the line: אלה תולדות אברהם, as opposed to Genesis 6,9-10 where amongst the תולדות of Noach we are told about his three sons; there is no mention or allusion to any converts that Noach had attracted to monotheism other than his own flesh and blood. The word אלה, “these,” is almost always used as a limitation, i.e. “these and none other.” In Noach’s case, he had failed to “acquire souls.”
When we reflect on this we will understand why the Torah wrote ונח מצא חן בעיני ה', instead of ונח היה לו חן בעיני ה'. The latter formulation would mean that when Noach faced G’d he brought with him much to commend him, i.e. his converts, whereas the formulation the Torah uses implies that G’d had to go looking for Noach; indeed he was a valuable find, a צדיק תמים, a perfectly righteous man, but not one that could not be overlooked such as Avraham’s “Chassidim.”
When the Torah testifies that את האלוקים התהלך נח, “Noach walked with G’d,” this sounds as proof of Noach’s aloofness vis a vis his fellow man [at least during the 120 years prior to the deluge when he was busy building his ark. Ed.] He was in step with G’d, but out of step with his peers. This is why the Torah repeats once more (verse 10) that he sired three sons, although the Torah had informed us of this already at the end of the last chapter (Genesis 5:32).
Noach, though aware of the many sexual perversions practiced by the people around him, and being steadfast in not copying their behaviour, is attested to by the Torah describing him as תמים היה בדורותיו, “he was perfect in his time.” Nonetheless, his loyalty to the Creator certainly did not endear him to his peers, hence “he walked with G’d”, as there was no one else “with whom to walk.” Sadly, only G’d appreciated his self-restraint, his righteousness.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Genesis 6,9. “The Lord said to Avram: ‘go for yourself,’ etc.” Many commentators ask why Avram endangered Sarai by taking her with him to Egypt, seeing that G’d had not given any instruction for either him or his wife to go to Egypt? The answer may be in the words: אל הארץ אשר אראך, “to the land that I will show you.” By being vague about Avram’s destination, and not naming the country, G’d may have hinted that Avram should move to any country which circumstances would indicate as a suitable destination for him. Hence, when he came to Eretz Yisrael and shortly thereafter a famine struck that land, he reasoned that it was time for him to move further south, to Egypt where there was no famine. This is the meaning of 12,10 ויהי רעב בארץ וירד אברם מצרימה כי כבד הרעב בארץ, “It was that when a famine broke out in the land, Avram descended to Egypt as the famine in the land was severe.” He took the outbreak of the famine as a sign from G’d not to remain in the land of Canaan, but to move on. He was convinced that he acted in accordance with G’d’s wishes.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Flames of Faith
Thereareindividualswhoare Shabbos, andtheyhaveanall-encompassing holiness. These individuals have within their souls a little bit of every other soul that exists. They touch all and provide added strength to the totality of the natural world. All the blessings for the coming six days, the realm of time, flow through Shabbos, and the Divine blessings for all lands, the realm of space, flow through Jerusalem. Similarly, there is an individual through which all souls are blessed.61“The Land of Israel in general, and Jerusalem in particular, are the very heart and center of the world as a whole. The life-force for the world, all blessings and emanations from Above, therefore, issue to all countries through Jerusalem and the Land of Israel…. It is the very same with the people of Israel. It is the very heart of all mankind. Thus Israel is the channel for the sustenance and all bless-ings of the world…. In analogous terms, the tzaddik, the leader and shepherd of Israel, is the very heart of the people of Israel. Thus he is the very specific channel connecting Above and below” (Chasidic Dimensions, pgs, 114 -115). The tzaddik is this person, the personification of Shabbos.62Since the tzaddik is the person of Shabbos and Israel is the land of Shabbos there is a special relationship between the Holy Land and the tzaddik. An example of this is the Biblical figure Noah. Noah is called a tzaddik (Gen. 6:9), and he was saved from the deluge that destroyed the earth. According to Rabbinic tradition, the Land of Israel was never touched by the flood. Noah embodied Israel, which was why he experienced the Land of Israel wherever he went (Tzion Ve-Arehah pg. 15, Emunas Etecha, Bereishis, pg, 3 s.v. ve-yadua).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Having said all this, we are faced with the question why according to Rashi, (Genesis 7,7) Noach was of a category described by our sages as קטני אמונה, “lacking in adequate faith.” How could a man be described as perfectly righteous, צדיק תמים, and at the same time display a lack of faith in the Lord? Another question we must ask is why Noach, if he did not feel that rebuking his peers would help, did not at least pray for his fellow human beings prior to the deluge?
We must refer once more to the distinction between the two categories of righteous people. One category has earned the title “tzaddik” because he serves only the one and only true G’d, the Creator, and believes that this Creator is all powerful and guides the universe in accordance with His wishes.
Noach, though aware of the many sexual perversions practiced by the people around him, and being steadfast in not copying their behaviour, is attested to by the Torah describing him as תמים היה בדורותיו, “he was perfect in his time.” Nonetheless, his loyalty to the Creator certainly did not endear him to his peers, hence “he walked with G’d”, as there was no one else “with whom to walk.” Sadly, only G’d appreciated his self-restraint, his righteousness.
Having said all this, we are faced with the question why according to Rashi, (Genesis 7,7) Noach was of a category described by our sages as קטני אמונה, “lacking in adequate faith.” How could a man be described as perfectly righteous, צדיק תמים, and at the same time display a lack of faith in the Lord? Another question we must ask is why Noach, if he did not feel that rebuking his peers would help, did not at least pray for his fellow human beings prior to the deluge?
We must refer once more to the distinction between the two categories of righteous people. One category has earned the title “tzaddik” because he serves only the one and only true G’d, the Creator, and believes that this Creator is all powerful and guides the universe in accordance with His wishes.
Rabbi Shmuel bar Nachmeni in Moed Katan 16 commenting on Samuel II 23,1 where the prophet introduces King David’s last utterances, (actually a “hymn,”) with the words: נאום דוד בן ישי ונאום הגבר הוקם על, ”words of David son of Yishai, and of the strong man who has been elevated and anointed by G’d, etc.” He continues there in verse 3: אמר אלוקי ישראל לי דבר צור ישראל מושל באדם צדיק מושל יראת אלוקים, “Israel’s G’d said concerning me: ‘be ruler over mankind, be ruler over awe of G’d.’” According to Rabbi Shmuel bar Nachmeni, the somewhat enigmatic verse must be understood as follows: David, who had raised high the banner of repentance (when he said to the prophet Natan in response to his rebuke that he had been guilty of without ifs or buts in the matter of Bat Sheva) “G’d rules man, whereas the righteous rules G’d.” What is meant by “the righteous rules G’d?” Initially G’d decrees what man’s fate will be; however, the intercession of a tzaddik’s prayer” may result in G’d’s decree being cancelled.” The Talmud suggests that when a tzaddik is not only concerned with his own salvation but endeavours to bring sinners closer to G’d, his prayer can influence G’d to the extent that He will cancel a decree of death already promulgated in heaven against certain individuals or groups of people. Noach, alas, did not engage in active attempts to influence people by rebuking them.
[No doubt, whenever Noach was asked during the 120 years that he built the ark why he did so, he told his peers that G’d had instructed him to do this in order to escape the deluge that would occur. Ed.]
One of the reasons that he did not pray for his fellow man may have been that he felt inadequate to be able to cancel a decree that G’d had told him He had issued. He may have been motivated by considerations we encounter in connection with Neuchadnezzar (Sanhedrin 92). We are told there that when throwing Chananyah, Michael and Azaryah into a fiery furnace from which all three were saved, G’d also commanded Ezekiel to revive the dead bones of the Jews that had been killed by Nevuchadnezzar when he destroyed Jerusalem and burned the Temple. One of the newly revived was instructed to touch Nevuchadnezzar on his forehead and to identify himself as one of the many thousands who had been resurrected. Nevuchadnezzar was so impressed that he began to compose songs of praise extolling the Almighty. Thereupon an angel shut Nevuchadnezzar’s mouth to prevent him from continuing. Had the angel not done so, all the hymns composed by King David would have lost in value when compared to the songs composed by Nevuchadnezzar.
The word used by the Talmud to describe what would have occurred is לגנות, “to denigrate, or defame.” When reminding ourselves of the tzaddik’s ability, under certain conditions to reverse a decree that originated from the Attribute of Justice, and to cause it to become a beneficial decree, we can understand why Nevuchadnezzar had begun to sing the Lord’s praises; [after all he had deliberately destroyed G’d’s Temple on earth. Ed.] When he noticed that Ezekiel’s prayers had resulted in an army of people being resurrected, he became afraid that another prayer by the same person, or persons like him, would result in his life’s work, the destruction of the Temple, being reversed also. In order to pre-empt any prayer by any tzaddik being able to achieve this, he tried to pre-empt anyone from offering such a prayer and being granted his request, by extolling G’d’s greatness in even more glowing terms than David had done in the Book of Psalms.
Noach, far from being a boastful individual, proclaiming himself as a major deity, was the very opposite, a humble person, to whom it would not have occurred that a prayer of his would influence G’d to reverse a decree which He had certainly not arrived at without first having agonized over it. [He even told Noach that He would delay execution of this decree for up to 120 years, this is why He told Noach when he was 480 years old to start building the ark. Ed.] It was because he did not consider himself as especially righteous, that he reasoned that just as he would be saved, so there must be numerous other people of similar stature who would also be saved. When G’d noticed this, He told Noach (Genesis 6,13) that He would have to proceed with His intention to destroy the human race as there was no one who had tried to intercede on their behalf. Nonetheless, He made plain to Noach, that although he had not interceded on behalf of his fellow humans, He would maintain the existing covenant between G’d and mankind through Noach and his family. (Genesis 6,18).
We must refer once more to the distinction between the two categories of righteous people. One category has earned the title “tzaddik” because he serves only the one and only true G’d, the Creator, and believes that this Creator is all powerful and guides the universe in accordance with His wishes.
Noach, though aware of the many sexual perversions practiced by the people around him, and being steadfast in not copying their behaviour, is attested to by the Torah describing him as תמים היה בדורותיו, “he was perfect in his time.” Nonetheless, his loyalty to the Creator certainly did not endear him to his peers, hence “he walked with G’d”, as there was no one else “with whom to walk.” Sadly, only G’d appreciated his self-restraint, his righteousness.
Having said all this, we are faced with the question why according to Rashi, (Genesis 7,7) Noach was of a category described by our sages as קטני אמונה, “lacking in adequate faith.” How could a man be described as perfectly righteous, צדיק תמים, and at the same time display a lack of faith in the Lord? Another question we must ask is why Noach, if he did not feel that rebuking his peers would help, did not at least pray for his fellow human beings prior to the deluge?
We must refer once more to the distinction between the two categories of righteous people. One category has earned the title “tzaddik” because he serves only the one and only true G’d, the Creator, and believes that this Creator is all powerful and guides the universe in accordance with His wishes.
Rabbi Shmuel bar Nachmeni in Moed Katan 16 commenting on Samuel II 23,1 where the prophet introduces King David’s last utterances, (actually a “hymn,”) with the words: נאום דוד בן ישי ונאום הגבר הוקם על, ”words of David son of Yishai, and of the strong man who has been elevated and anointed by G’d, etc.” He continues there in verse 3: אמר אלוקי ישראל לי דבר צור ישראל מושל באדם צדיק מושל יראת אלוקים, “Israel’s G’d said concerning me: ‘be ruler over mankind, be ruler over awe of G’d.’” According to Rabbi Shmuel bar Nachmeni, the somewhat enigmatic verse must be understood as follows: David, who had raised high the banner of repentance (when he said to the prophet Natan in response to his rebuke that he had been guilty of without ifs or buts in the matter of Bat Sheva) “G’d rules man, whereas the righteous rules G’d.” What is meant by “the righteous rules G’d?” Initially G’d decrees what man’s fate will be; however, the intercession of a tzaddik’s prayer” may result in G’d’s decree being cancelled.” The Talmud suggests that when a tzaddik is not only concerned with his own salvation but endeavours to bring sinners closer to G’d, his prayer can influence G’d to the extent that He will cancel a decree of death already promulgated in heaven against certain individuals or groups of people. Noach, alas, did not engage in active attempts to influence people by rebuking them.
[No doubt, whenever Noach was asked during the 120 years that he built the ark why he did so, he told his peers that G’d had instructed him to do this in order to escape the deluge that would occur. Ed.]
One of the reasons that he did not pray for his fellow man may have been that he felt inadequate to be able to cancel a decree that G’d had told him He had issued. He may have been motivated by considerations we encounter in connection with Neuchadnezzar (Sanhedrin 92). We are told there that when throwing Chananyah, Michael and Azaryah into a fiery furnace from which all three were saved, G’d also commanded Ezekiel to revive the dead bones of the Jews that had been killed by Nevuchadnezzar when he destroyed Jerusalem and burned the Temple. One of the newly revived was instructed to touch Nevuchadnezzar on his forehead and to identify himself as one of the many thousands who had been resurrected. Nevuchadnezzar was so impressed that he began to compose songs of praise extolling the Almighty. Thereupon an angel shut Nevuchadnezzar’s mouth to prevent him from continuing. Had the angel not done so, all the hymns composed by King David would have lost in value when compared to the songs composed by Nevuchadnezzar.
The word used by the Talmud to describe what would have occurred is לגנות, “to denigrate, or defame.” When reminding ourselves of the tzaddik’s ability, under certain conditions to reverse a decree that originated from the Attribute of Justice, and to cause it to become a beneficial decree, we can understand why Nevuchadnezzar had begun to sing the Lord’s praises; [after all he had deliberately destroyed G’d’s Temple on earth. Ed.] When he noticed that Ezekiel’s prayers had resulted in an army of people being resurrected, he became afraid that another prayer by the same person, or persons like him, would result in his life’s work, the destruction of the Temple, being reversed also. In order to pre-empt any prayer by any tzaddik being able to achieve this, he tried to pre-empt anyone from offering such a prayer and being granted his request, by extolling G’d’s greatness in even more glowing terms than David had done in the Book of Psalms.
Noach, far from being a boastful individual, proclaiming himself as a major deity, was the very opposite, a humble person, to whom it would not have occurred that a prayer of his would influence G’d to reverse a decree which He had certainly not arrived at without first having agonized over it. [He even told Noach that He would delay execution of this decree for up to 120 years, this is why He told Noach when he was 480 years old to start building the ark. Ed.] It was because he did not consider himself as especially righteous, that he reasoned that just as he would be saved, so there must be numerous other people of similar stature who would also be saved. When G’d noticed this, He told Noach (Genesis 6,13) that He would have to proceed with His intention to destroy the human race as there was no one who had tried to intercede on their behalf. Nonetheless, He made plain to Noach, that although he had not interceded on behalf of his fellow humans, He would maintain the existing covenant between G’d and mankind through Noach and his family. (Genesis 6,18).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Having said all this, we are faced with the question why according to Rashi, (Genesis 7,7) Noach was of a category described by our sages as קטני אמונה, “lacking in adequate faith.” How could a man be described as perfectly righteous, צדיק תמים, and at the same time display a lack of faith in the Lord? Another question we must ask is why Noach, if he did not feel that rebuking his peers would help, did not at least pray for his fellow human beings prior to the deluge?
We must refer once more to the distinction between the two categories of righteous people. One category has earned the title “tzaddik” because he serves only the one and only true G’d, the Creator, and believes that this Creator is all powerful and guides the universe in accordance with His wishes.
Noach, though aware of the many sexual perversions practiced by the people around him, and being steadfast in not copying their behaviour, is attested to by the Torah describing him as תמים היה בדורותיו, “he was perfect in his time.” Nonetheless, his loyalty to the Creator certainly did not endear him to his peers, hence “he walked with G’d”, as there was no one else “with whom to walk.” Sadly, only G’d appreciated his self-restraint, his righteousness.
Having said all this, we are faced with the question why according to Rashi, (Genesis 7,7) Noach was of a category described by our sages as קטני אמונה, “lacking in adequate faith.” How could a man be described as perfectly righteous, צדיק תמים, and at the same time display a lack of faith in the Lord? Another question we must ask is why Noach, if he did not feel that rebuking his peers would help, did not at least pray for his fellow human beings prior to the deluge?
We must refer once more to the distinction between the two categories of righteous people. One category has earned the title “tzaddik” because he serves only the one and only true G’d, the Creator, and believes that this Creator is all powerful and guides the universe in accordance with His wishes.
Rabbi Shmuel bar Nachmeni in Moed Katan 16 commenting on Samuel II 23,1 where the prophet introduces King David’s last utterances, (actually a “hymn,”) with the words: נאום דוד בן ישי ונאום הגבר הוקם על, ”words of David son of Yishai, and of the strong man who has been elevated and anointed by G’d, etc.” He continues there in verse 3: אמר אלוקי ישראל לי דבר צור ישראל מושל באדם צדיק מושל יראת אלוקים, “Israel’s G’d said concerning me: ‘be ruler over mankind, be ruler over awe of G’d.’” According to Rabbi Shmuel bar Nachmeni, the somewhat enigmatic verse must be understood as follows: David, who had raised high the banner of repentance (when he said to the prophet Natan in response to his rebuke that he had been guilty of without ifs or buts in the matter of Bat Sheva) “G’d rules man, whereas the righteous rules G’d.” What is meant by “the righteous rules G’d?” Initially G’d decrees what man’s fate will be; however, the intercession of a tzaddik’s prayer” may result in G’d’s decree being cancelled.” The Talmud suggests that when a tzaddik is not only concerned with his own salvation but endeavours to bring sinners closer to G’d, his prayer can influence G’d to the extent that He will cancel a decree of death already promulgated in heaven against certain individuals or groups of people. Noach, alas, did not engage in active attempts to influence people by rebuking them.
[No doubt, whenever Noach was asked during the 120 years that he built the ark why he did so, he told his peers that G’d had instructed him to do this in order to escape the deluge that would occur. Ed.]
One of the reasons that he did not pray for his fellow man may have been that he felt inadequate to be able to cancel a decree that G’d had told him He had issued. He may have been motivated by considerations we encounter in connection with Neuchadnezzar (Sanhedrin 92). We are told there that when throwing Chananyah, Michael and Azaryah into a fiery furnace from which all three were saved, G’d also commanded Ezekiel to revive the dead bones of the Jews that had been killed by Nevuchadnezzar when he destroyed Jerusalem and burned the Temple. One of the newly revived was instructed to touch Nevuchadnezzar on his forehead and to identify himself as one of the many thousands who had been resurrected. Nevuchadnezzar was so impressed that he began to compose songs of praise extolling the Almighty. Thereupon an angel shut Nevuchadnezzar’s mouth to prevent him from continuing. Had the angel not done so, all the hymns composed by King David would have lost in value when compared to the songs composed by Nevuchadnezzar.
The word used by the Talmud to describe what would have occurred is לגנות, “to denigrate, or defame.” When reminding ourselves of the tzaddik’s ability, under certain conditions to reverse a decree that originated from the Attribute of Justice, and to cause it to become a beneficial decree, we can understand why Nevuchadnezzar had begun to sing the Lord’s praises; [after all he had deliberately destroyed G’d’s Temple on earth. Ed.] When he noticed that Ezekiel’s prayers had resulted in an army of people being resurrected, he became afraid that another prayer by the same person, or persons like him, would result in his life’s work, the destruction of the Temple, being reversed also. In order to pre-empt any prayer by any tzaddik being able to achieve this, he tried to pre-empt anyone from offering such a prayer and being granted his request, by extolling G’d’s greatness in even more glowing terms than David had done in the Book of Psalms.
Noach, far from being a boastful individual, proclaiming himself as a major deity, was the very opposite, a humble person, to whom it would not have occurred that a prayer of his would influence G’d to reverse a decree which He had certainly not arrived at without first having agonized over it. [He even told Noach that He would delay execution of this decree for up to 120 years, this is why He told Noach when he was 480 years old to start building the ark. Ed.] It was because he did not consider himself as especially righteous, that he reasoned that just as he would be saved, so there must be numerous other people of similar stature who would also be saved. When G’d noticed this, He told Noach (Genesis 6,13) that He would have to proceed with His intention to destroy the human race as there was no one who had tried to intercede on their behalf. Nonetheless, He made plain to Noach, that although he had not interceded on behalf of his fellow humans, He would maintain the existing covenant between G’d and mankind through Noach and his family. (Genesis 6,18).
We must refer once more to the distinction between the two categories of righteous people. One category has earned the title “tzaddik” because he serves only the one and only true G’d, the Creator, and believes that this Creator is all powerful and guides the universe in accordance with His wishes.
Noach, though aware of the many sexual perversions practiced by the people around him, and being steadfast in not copying their behaviour, is attested to by the Torah describing him as תמים היה בדורותיו, “he was perfect in his time.” Nonetheless, his loyalty to the Creator certainly did not endear him to his peers, hence “he walked with G’d”, as there was no one else “with whom to walk.” Sadly, only G’d appreciated his self-restraint, his righteousness.
Having said all this, we are faced with the question why according to Rashi, (Genesis 7,7) Noach was of a category described by our sages as קטני אמונה, “lacking in adequate faith.” How could a man be described as perfectly righteous, צדיק תמים, and at the same time display a lack of faith in the Lord? Another question we must ask is why Noach, if he did not feel that rebuking his peers would help, did not at least pray for his fellow human beings prior to the deluge?
We must refer once more to the distinction between the two categories of righteous people. One category has earned the title “tzaddik” because he serves only the one and only true G’d, the Creator, and believes that this Creator is all powerful and guides the universe in accordance with His wishes.
Rabbi Shmuel bar Nachmeni in Moed Katan 16 commenting on Samuel II 23,1 where the prophet introduces King David’s last utterances, (actually a “hymn,”) with the words: נאום דוד בן ישי ונאום הגבר הוקם על, ”words of David son of Yishai, and of the strong man who has been elevated and anointed by G’d, etc.” He continues there in verse 3: אמר אלוקי ישראל לי דבר צור ישראל מושל באדם צדיק מושל יראת אלוקים, “Israel’s G’d said concerning me: ‘be ruler over mankind, be ruler over awe of G’d.’” According to Rabbi Shmuel bar Nachmeni, the somewhat enigmatic verse must be understood as follows: David, who had raised high the banner of repentance (when he said to the prophet Natan in response to his rebuke that he had been guilty of without ifs or buts in the matter of Bat Sheva) “G’d rules man, whereas the righteous rules G’d.” What is meant by “the righteous rules G’d?” Initially G’d decrees what man’s fate will be; however, the intercession of a tzaddik’s prayer” may result in G’d’s decree being cancelled.” The Talmud suggests that when a tzaddik is not only concerned with his own salvation but endeavours to bring sinners closer to G’d, his prayer can influence G’d to the extent that He will cancel a decree of death already promulgated in heaven against certain individuals or groups of people. Noach, alas, did not engage in active attempts to influence people by rebuking them.
[No doubt, whenever Noach was asked during the 120 years that he built the ark why he did so, he told his peers that G’d had instructed him to do this in order to escape the deluge that would occur. Ed.]
One of the reasons that he did not pray for his fellow man may have been that he felt inadequate to be able to cancel a decree that G’d had told him He had issued. He may have been motivated by considerations we encounter in connection with Neuchadnezzar (Sanhedrin 92). We are told there that when throwing Chananyah, Michael and Azaryah into a fiery furnace from which all three were saved, G’d also commanded Ezekiel to revive the dead bones of the Jews that had been killed by Nevuchadnezzar when he destroyed Jerusalem and burned the Temple. One of the newly revived was instructed to touch Nevuchadnezzar on his forehead and to identify himself as one of the many thousands who had been resurrected. Nevuchadnezzar was so impressed that he began to compose songs of praise extolling the Almighty. Thereupon an angel shut Nevuchadnezzar’s mouth to prevent him from continuing. Had the angel not done so, all the hymns composed by King David would have lost in value when compared to the songs composed by Nevuchadnezzar.
The word used by the Talmud to describe what would have occurred is לגנות, “to denigrate, or defame.” When reminding ourselves of the tzaddik’s ability, under certain conditions to reverse a decree that originated from the Attribute of Justice, and to cause it to become a beneficial decree, we can understand why Nevuchadnezzar had begun to sing the Lord’s praises; [after all he had deliberately destroyed G’d’s Temple on earth. Ed.] When he noticed that Ezekiel’s prayers had resulted in an army of people being resurrected, he became afraid that another prayer by the same person, or persons like him, would result in his life’s work, the destruction of the Temple, being reversed also. In order to pre-empt any prayer by any tzaddik being able to achieve this, he tried to pre-empt anyone from offering such a prayer and being granted his request, by extolling G’d’s greatness in even more glowing terms than David had done in the Book of Psalms.
Noach, far from being a boastful individual, proclaiming himself as a major deity, was the very opposite, a humble person, to whom it would not have occurred that a prayer of his would influence G’d to reverse a decree which He had certainly not arrived at without first having agonized over it. [He even told Noach that He would delay execution of this decree for up to 120 years, this is why He told Noach when he was 480 years old to start building the ark. Ed.] It was because he did not consider himself as especially righteous, that he reasoned that just as he would be saved, so there must be numerous other people of similar stature who would also be saved. When G’d noticed this, He told Noach (Genesis 6,13) that He would have to proceed with His intention to destroy the human race as there was no one who had tried to intercede on their behalf. Nonetheless, He made plain to Noach, that although he had not interceded on behalf of his fellow humans, He would maintain the existing covenant between G’d and mankind through Noach and his family. (Genesis 6,18).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Sha'ar HaEmunah VeYesod HaChasidut
God began to shine the words of Torah to man from the very day he was created. This is because the God created the world with the Torah.32Referring to the famous statement in the Zohar and the Midrash, that “God looked into the Torah, and created the world.” Since man was created through the vehicle of the very letters of the Torah, he was illuminated with the very knowledge with which he was created, and which consitutes the root of his life. Consider the following passages in the Zohar:33The following passages all relate that from the very creation of Adam, God gave man a book of rules and meditations through which he could live a just life and come to a knowledge of his Creator. And Rabbi Abba said, “We know that a book descended to Adam HaRishon, and through it he knew and understood the supernal wisdom. This book reached the, ‘bnei Elohim,’34See Bereshit, 6:2. who were the sages of the generation, and whoever else was worthy of looking into it. In this way they arrived at the knowledge of supernal wisdom … Similarly, it is taught that Hanokh had a book, and this book was from the place of the book of the Generations of Man.”35See Bereshit, 5:1. (Zohar, Bereshit, 37b): We have already explained that when Adam was in the Garden of Eden God sent him a book through Raziel, the holy angel in charge of the mysteries of the holy supernal ones. Supernal impressions were imprinted in this book, holy wisdom, and seventy-two kinds of wisdom were explained in three hundred and seventy engravings of supernal mysteries. He left this book to his son Shet and all his descendants until it reached Avraham. By means of it, Avraham knew how to gaze upon the Glory of his Master. This has been explained. Similarly, Adam gave a book to his son Hanokh, from which he looked upon the supernal Glory.”(Zohar, Bereshit, 55b) Come and see! From his childhood, Noah saw the actions of man and how they sinned against the Holy One, blessed be He. So he hid himself, and occupied himself with the service of his Master … If you ask, what book did he use to contemplate Divine service? He studied the book of Adam and the book of Hanokh in order to know how to serve his Master. (Zohar, Bereshit, 58b) Rabbi Shimon said, if I had been alive at the time when the Holy One, blessed be He, gave the book to Hanokh and to Adam, I would have made great efforts that they not become accessible to people. (Zohar, Noah, 78b)
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Me'or Einayim
Noah walked with God (Gen. 6:9) Rashi explained: “But regarding Abraham it says, [Walk before me (Gen. 17:1)], Before whom I have walked (Gen. 24:40); Noah needed assistance to support him, but Abraham strengthened himself with his righteousness and walked independently.” But this is difficult to understand as well, for does the verse not say [Noah was a] completely righteous [man] (Gen. 6:9)? And if [Rashi’s comment is correct,] then he is not “complete” since he lacks the level of Abraham!
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Another approach to understanding the opening verse of our portion is based on the fact that the root פקד frequently is used to describe something that is missing or lacking. Sometimes a person feels he is on the way to becoming a tzaddik, or has already become one.
Such exaggerated self-esteem is not proof of a spiritual accomplishment, but, on the contrary, indicates at least immaturity if not arrogance. Anyone thinking of himself in such terms has not even begun his career as a servant of the Lord. This is hinted at in the words: כי תשא את ראש בני ישראל, the Torah teaches that “when you want to elevate the spiritual level of the Children of Israel to a higher spiritual plateau”, then לפקודיהם, “you have to point out to them the areas in which their personalities are still below par, still miss a basic ingredient, humility.” One of the well known verses in which the root פקד describes the absence of someone, something important being missing, is in Samuel I 20,25 when David’s absence at the festive meal given by the King on New Moon, is described with the words ויפקד מקום דוד, “David’s seat had remained empty.” When considering the dual nature of the meaning of this root, we may translate this word in our verse as “their contribution consisted primarily in their awareness that they still lacked many good qualities and had to work on acquiring them.”
The word כופר in our verse, translated as “ransom,” also appears in different meanings, one that is familiar being in Genesis 6,14 where Noach receives G’d’s instructions in how to ensure that the ark he is building will be waterproof. The Torah writes: וכפרת אותו מבית ומחוץ בכופר; “smear it from the inside and the outside with כופר, i.e. the awareness that you need atonement.” An appropriate translation, based on our understanding of the word פקד as something lacking, would be that “when is man truly attached, ‘glued to’ G’d, when he is truly aware of his shortcomings.”
Such exaggerated self-esteem is not proof of a spiritual accomplishment, but, on the contrary, indicates at least immaturity if not arrogance. Anyone thinking of himself in such terms has not even begun his career as a servant of the Lord. This is hinted at in the words: כי תשא את ראש בני ישראל, the Torah teaches that “when you want to elevate the spiritual level of the Children of Israel to a higher spiritual plateau”, then לפקודיהם, “you have to point out to them the areas in which their personalities are still below par, still miss a basic ingredient, humility.” One of the well known verses in which the root פקד describes the absence of someone, something important being missing, is in Samuel I 20,25 when David’s absence at the festive meal given by the King on New Moon, is described with the words ויפקד מקום דוד, “David’s seat had remained empty.” When considering the dual nature of the meaning of this root, we may translate this word in our verse as “their contribution consisted primarily in their awareness that they still lacked many good qualities and had to work on acquiring them.”
The word כופר in our verse, translated as “ransom,” also appears in different meanings, one that is familiar being in Genesis 6,14 where Noach receives G’d’s instructions in how to ensure that the ark he is building will be waterproof. The Torah writes: וכפרת אותו מבית ומחוץ בכופר; “smear it from the inside and the outside with כופר, i.e. the awareness that you need atonement.” An appropriate translation, based on our understanding of the word פקד as something lacking, would be that “when is man truly attached, ‘glued to’ G’d, when he is truly aware of his shortcomings.”
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Still another facet of the line:אלה תולדות נח, נח איש צדיק, תמים היה בדורותיו, may be appreciated by the reader after we have “digested” Rashi’s commentary on Genesis 7,7 ויבא נח..... אל התבה מפני מי המבול, “Noach (and family) entered the ark on account of the waters of the deluge.” Rashi uses this verse to state that Noach was deficient in his faith in G’d. [Rashi based himself on Bereshit Rabbah 32,6 who explains the extraneous words: “on account of the waters of the deluge,” as telling us that Noach did not enter the ark until the rising waters of the flood made this unavoidable.”] This exegesis appears to fly in the face of an explicit verse in Genesis 6,22 according to which Noach carried out every single one of G’d’s instructions without exception. How could the author of the Midrash accuse Noach of being lacking in faith? If someone spent 120 years building an ark, anticipating a deluge, because G’d had told him to do so, how can this be interpreted as “lack of faith?”We must bear in mind that all the holy “sparks” are possessed of an urge to serve their Creator, just as do the different categories of angels all of whom vie to fulfill the wishes of their Creator while being in awe of Him. The tzaddik, being a mortal human being and burdened with an evil urge within him, may not always serve his master with a similar degree of single-mindedness. He may be sidetracked by thinking of money, or the allure of secular attractions, including good-tasting fruit, etc. One of the causes distracting the tzaddik from serving his Creator with the same degree of single-mindedness as the angels is that in order to bring the sinners closer to G’d, he must first befriend them. The sinners are sinners because the have within them some of the 288 sparks that “fell off” the Shechinah, as we explained on page 21.
[A רשע, sinner, who too has been created in the image of G’d, contains within him some of these sparks, though they have become tainted through their close association with the sinner. Ed.]
In the process of “outreaching,” as it is commonly known in our time, the exposure of the highest ranking type of tzaddik to the lure of secularism is such that he may momentarily forget his true calling, feeling drawn to these “perks” of olam hazeh, as advertised by Satan in eye-catching colors. A tzaddik engaged in such activities may be viewed as being engaged in a מלחמת מצוה, “a holy war,” on behalf of his Creator.
[A רשע, sinner, who too has been created in the image of G’d, contains within him some of these sparks, though they have become tainted through their close association with the sinner. Ed.]
In the process of “outreaching,” as it is commonly known in our time, the exposure of the highest ranking type of tzaddik to the lure of secularism is such that he may momentarily forget his true calling, feeling drawn to these “perks” of olam hazeh, as advertised by Satan in eye-catching colors. A tzaddik engaged in such activities may be viewed as being engaged in a מלחמת מצוה, “a holy war,” on behalf of his Creator.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Another approach to understanding the opening verse of our portion is based on the fact that the root פקד frequently is used to describe something that is missing or lacking. Sometimes a person feels he is on the way to becoming a tzaddik, or has already become one.
Such exaggerated self-esteem is not proof of a spiritual accomplishment, but, on the contrary, indicates at least immaturity if not arrogance. Anyone thinking of himself in such terms has not even begun his career as a servant of the Lord. This is hinted at in the words: כי תשא את ראש בני ישראל, the Torah teaches that “when you want to elevate the spiritual level of the Children of Israel to a higher spiritual plateau”, then לפקודיהם, “you have to point out to them the areas in which their personalities are still below par, still miss a basic ingredient, humility.” One of the well known verses in which the root פקד describes the absence of someone, something important being missing, is in Samuel I 20,25 when David’s absence at the festive meal given by the King on New Moon, is described with the words ויפקד מקום דוד, “David’s seat had remained empty.” When considering the dual nature of the meaning of this root, we may translate this word in our verse as “their contribution consisted primarily in their awareness that they still lacked many good qualities and had to work on acquiring them.”
The word כופר in our verse, translated as “ransom,” also appears in different meanings, one that is familiar being in Genesis 6,14 where Noach receives G’d’s instructions in how to ensure that the ark he is building will be waterproof. The Torah writes: וכפרת אותו מבית ומחוץ בכופר; “smear it from the inside and the outside with כופר, i.e. the awareness that you need atonement.” An appropriate translation, based on our understanding of the word פקד as something lacking, would be that “when is man truly attached, ‘glued to’ G’d, when he is truly aware of his shortcomings.”
Such exaggerated self-esteem is not proof of a spiritual accomplishment, but, on the contrary, indicates at least immaturity if not arrogance. Anyone thinking of himself in such terms has not even begun his career as a servant of the Lord. This is hinted at in the words: כי תשא את ראש בני ישראל, the Torah teaches that “when you want to elevate the spiritual level of the Children of Israel to a higher spiritual plateau”, then לפקודיהם, “you have to point out to them the areas in which their personalities are still below par, still miss a basic ingredient, humility.” One of the well known verses in which the root פקד describes the absence of someone, something important being missing, is in Samuel I 20,25 when David’s absence at the festive meal given by the King on New Moon, is described with the words ויפקד מקום דוד, “David’s seat had remained empty.” When considering the dual nature of the meaning of this root, we may translate this word in our verse as “their contribution consisted primarily in their awareness that they still lacked many good qualities and had to work on acquiring them.”
The word כופר in our verse, translated as “ransom,” also appears in different meanings, one that is familiar being in Genesis 6,14 where Noach receives G’d’s instructions in how to ensure that the ark he is building will be waterproof. The Torah writes: וכפרת אותו מבית ומחוץ בכופר; “smear it from the inside and the outside with כופר, i.e. the awareness that you need atonement.” An appropriate translation, based on our understanding of the word פקד as something lacking, would be that “when is man truly attached, ‘glued to’ G’d, when he is truly aware of his shortcomings.”
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Numbers 16,5. Come morning, the Lord will make known who is His and who is holy, whom He has granted access to Himself. Him whom He will choose He will bring close to Him."
We need to understand why, in the first half of the words Moses (G’d) speaks of “whom He had brought close to Himself” in the past tense, whereas immediately afterwards, “He will bring close to Himself” he changes to future tense. This verse contains an allusion to the proper manner in which to serve Hashem.
The subject is discussed in Rosh Hashanah, chapter 2, mishnah 7 where the mishnahreports that after the court had examined the witnesses who reported having seen the new moon and their testimony had been validated, the court proclaimed: מקודש, “the new month has been sanctified.” The people present then repeated the declaration of the court saying twice: מקודש מקודש. Why did the head of the court say the word מקודש only once, whereas the people were required to say it twice?
We have a general rule that when someone wishes to engage in service of the Lord, he has to distance himself first from any sins he had been guilty of, i.e. take his leave from a lifestyle that opposes G’d will, before he can be enrolled in the class of people actively serving the Lord, i.e. by performing His will. This will be a process that intensifies gradually. During every step of the way, the person who has left behind him a sinful lifestyle must be on his guard to serve the Lord by studying Torah, praying, and by sanctifying His name in various ways through his dealings with his fellow man, causing Him continuous pleasure when observing him. When keeping this in mind we can interpret the text of the Mishnah as follows: when the head of the court proclaimed the word מקודש, he thereby indicated that the separation from a negative lifestyle had been accomplished. When the people responded by saying the same word twice, they indicated that they were on the way to serving the Lord, reminding themselves at each stage how they were supposed to do this, i.e. that they needed both to keep distance from sin, and at the same time to maintain their awe of the Almighty, never to become too familiar with Him in the sense that they would permit themselves the kind of familiarities one does when in the company of mortal human beings. Moses refers to this when saying: ואת הקדוש, meaning that once one has attained this level of holiness one must remember with Whom one consorts. This person described as הקדוש in the verse above, is one who had already attained a certain level of sanctity, קדושה by his own efforts, and was no longer in need of being led by the hand all the time. (as Rashi explains in Parshat Noach on the words: את האלוקים התהלך נח, “Noach walked with G’d.”) (Genesis 6,9) When describing Avraham’s level of proximity to G’d the Torah (wrote Genesis 17,15) התהלך לפני, “strive to walk ahead of Me!”
When Moses (G’d) added ואת אשר יבחר בו, “and Whom He will select,” he indicated that the person concerned would require further support from the Almighty to lead him to his desired destination in his relations with G’d. The words יקריב אותו are the assurance by G’d that He would help that person along his chosen path to enable him to serve Him with a sincere heart.
We need to understand why, in the first half of the words Moses (G’d) speaks of “whom He had brought close to Himself” in the past tense, whereas immediately afterwards, “He will bring close to Himself” he changes to future tense. This verse contains an allusion to the proper manner in which to serve Hashem.
The subject is discussed in Rosh Hashanah, chapter 2, mishnah 7 where the mishnahreports that after the court had examined the witnesses who reported having seen the new moon and their testimony had been validated, the court proclaimed: מקודש, “the new month has been sanctified.” The people present then repeated the declaration of the court saying twice: מקודש מקודש. Why did the head of the court say the word מקודש only once, whereas the people were required to say it twice?
We have a general rule that when someone wishes to engage in service of the Lord, he has to distance himself first from any sins he had been guilty of, i.e. take his leave from a lifestyle that opposes G’d will, before he can be enrolled in the class of people actively serving the Lord, i.e. by performing His will. This will be a process that intensifies gradually. During every step of the way, the person who has left behind him a sinful lifestyle must be on his guard to serve the Lord by studying Torah, praying, and by sanctifying His name in various ways through his dealings with his fellow man, causing Him continuous pleasure when observing him. When keeping this in mind we can interpret the text of the Mishnah as follows: when the head of the court proclaimed the word מקודש, he thereby indicated that the separation from a negative lifestyle had been accomplished. When the people responded by saying the same word twice, they indicated that they were on the way to serving the Lord, reminding themselves at each stage how they were supposed to do this, i.e. that they needed both to keep distance from sin, and at the same time to maintain their awe of the Almighty, never to become too familiar with Him in the sense that they would permit themselves the kind of familiarities one does when in the company of mortal human beings. Moses refers to this when saying: ואת הקדוש, meaning that once one has attained this level of holiness one must remember with Whom one consorts. This person described as הקדוש in the verse above, is one who had already attained a certain level of sanctity, קדושה by his own efforts, and was no longer in need of being led by the hand all the time. (as Rashi explains in Parshat Noach on the words: את האלוקים התהלך נח, “Noach walked with G’d.”) (Genesis 6,9) When describing Avraham’s level of proximity to G’d the Torah (wrote Genesis 17,15) התהלך לפני, “strive to walk ahead of Me!”
When Moses (G’d) added ואת אשר יבחר בו, “and Whom He will select,” he indicated that the person concerned would require further support from the Almighty to lead him to his desired destination in his relations with G’d. The words יקריב אותו are the assurance by G’d that He would help that person along his chosen path to enable him to serve Him with a sincere heart.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Keter Shem Tov
From the BeSh"T. "There are three graces: the grace of a place on (in the eyes of) its inhabitants"... (Sotah 47a). This is explained in Chullin 91b, that [when Jacob slept] God "folded up all of the Land of Israel under him"; "the land which you lie upon, I will give it to you" (Genesis 28:13). Meaning, that you will not need to travel from place to place in order to clarify the land's sparks of holiness, for you will be able to clarify them in your place. "And Noah found grace..." (Genesis 6:8)
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Going back to the line: את האלוקים התהלך נח, “Noach walked with G’d;” the emphasis in this line is on the attribute for G’d used, i.e. אלוקים, the attribute of Justice. It was beyond Noach’s kind of tzidkut, righteousness, to turn the attribute of Justice into an attribute of Mercy through his lifestyle. In this respect he was different from Avraham and Yitzchok, concerning both of whom the Torah writes that they “walked before G’d,” not merely “with G’d.” (Compare Genesis 17,1 and 48,15) In those verses the Torah wished to alert us to the patriarchs’ ability to persuade G’d to substitute the attribute of Mercy for the attribute of Justice, on occasion.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Mevo HaShearim
But the Besht, in the path of hasidism and through his drawing-down, sanctified the body itself alongside worldly things. Therefore, eating itself is holy and a form of avodah, and a person should not afflict himself. Rather, he should strengthen himself little by little to break the power of desire etc... until he arrives at the essential foundation and root of holiness in every physical thing. As cited above from the Noam Elimelekh, an Israelite, when standing in holy service, in prayer or Torah study and the like, becomes so unified with God, reaching even the light of God’s essence, that is, that which is enclothed, not the clothing. Therefore, the awakening of his self, of the impassioned love and fear within him, is the very foundation and instantiation of the kavannot, as said above. It is also the soul of the words of prayer, the words (tevah) he speaks being the body,536In a common hasidic interpretive move, R. Shapiro puns off the dual meaning of the Hebrew tevah, meaning both word and container. and his passion—which is God’s illumination—giving it a soul. A person gives the soul to the word. “Make a window [tzohar] make for the ark [tevah],”537Genesis 6:16.—that is, put brightness and light into it [the word], says the Besht. He also says that when one reads the Torah and see the light of its letters, even if he does not chant correctly, since he reads with great love and passion etc, though he swallows the words...God loves him greatly. “His banner of love [diglo] was upon me538Song of Songs 2:4. —his skipping [dilgo] upon Me is loved.” Furthermore, one who inserts kavannot into his prayer only does so with the kavannot he knows. But when he says the word with great connection, all the kavannot enter into the words on their own. (Likutim Yekarim).539An anthology of teachings attributed to the Besht and other early masters.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Deuteronomy 12,5. “you are to seek out His residence and go there;” the letters in the word שמה are the same as in the name of משה, something that has been explained in the Tikkuney Hazohar as well as in Zohar III 273, in connection with psalms 33,14, ממכון שבתו השגיח, “from His dwelling place He supervises, etc.” There too, the first letter of each of these three words spells the name משה. It is pointed out there that already in Genesis 6,3 the word בשגם alludes to Moses, seeing that the letters ש and מ are directly part of his name, whereas the combined numerical value of the letters ב and ג add up to 5=ה. According to the Midrash Shir Hashirim rabbah, 1,64 Moses was equivalent to the entire Jewish people on the one hand, whereas every individual Israelite had to strive to become Moses’ equal. In other words, the word שקול “of equal weight,” is to be understood as “in both directions.” When applied to the verse in psalms 33,14 “G’d supervises the whole earth,” refers to the Israelites, and the words ובאת שמה, in our verse above assure Moses that he is the vehicle that enables the individual Israelite to be welcome in G’d’s residence, the Temple or Tabernacle. It was Moses who enabled the Israelites to attain that level of holiness.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Genesis 6,14. “you are to construct compartments in the ark.” The word קנים is the plural mode of the word קן, “nest,” as in “bird’s nest.” In other words, the ark was to serve as a residence for all the creatures within it. The word תיבה does not only mean “ark,” but also means: “word.” G’d tells Noach that all his activities, would be confined to the inside of the ark, including speech which would be taking place inside it, including prayer.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Baal Shem Tov
"Make an opening [tzohar] for the ark [teivah], closing up to a cubit at the top." (Genesis 6:16) -- The Baal Shem Tov, peace be upon him, explained these words in the following way: let the word (teivah) said in Torah or in prayer radiate light (matzhir)! For in every letter there are worlds, souls and divinity, that rise up and interconnect and cleave to one another and to the divine. Afterwards, these letters connect and conjoin, finally becoming a word. After that, they connect and unify unifications of truth in the Divine - and one must unify one's soul with each of the aforementioned aspects. In this way, all the worlds rise and become as one, and then there is immense joy and immeasurable delight. This is the meaning of "...bottom, second, and third decks," (Genesis 6:16) - that is the worlds, souls and divinities, as it says (Zohar I:159a) "there are three worlds, etc." In each and every word one must listen to what is being spoken, since the Shechina is the world of speech, as it is says (Zohar III:230a) "She speaks and He is Her escort." "Tzohar" - this 'opening' for light - that everything should be illuminated with clarity, giving pleasure to the Creator. One needs great faith (Emunah) for this, since the Shechinah Herself is called Emunat Amen, faithful faith (Zohar II:16b). Without faith, Heaven forbid, She is called (Proverbs 16:28) "A querulous one who alienates their friend." As for the end of the verse, "closing up to a cubit (amah)" -- this is the Mother (Ima). It could be said that after the word leaves one's mouth, it does not need to be remembered again, one does not see that it rises to an elevated place, just as one can not look at the sun, as it says, "closing up at the top." How does one do all this? "Go into the ark [teivah], you and all your household." (Genesis 7:1) -- this means that with all your body and strengths, you shall enter the word [teivah]!
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
Genesis 6,21. “and you are to take for yourself some of everything that serves as food, etc;” here the Torah alludes to the reason why until the deluge man was forbidden to eat animals, (according to Nachmanides). Noach saved the animals from extinction during the deluge; he therefore- as representative of the human race- became the “owner” of the animal kingdom, and as such entitled to use some of the animals, after due preparation without causing pain to the animals, as food for himself. When Avraham, in Genesis 23,13 urged Efron to accept the money he had readied for the purchase of the cave of Machpelah wherein he planned to bury Sarah, the word קח is used as denoting the acquisition of something. Avraham had learned this expression and its meaning from our verse where it is used in this sense for the first time. Noach made an additional acquisition when taking the animal into the ark with him. [He had previously been permitted to use the animals as beasts of burden, etc. Ed.]
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Baal Shem Tov
"Make an opening (tzohar) in the ark (teivah)" (Genesis 6:16) --My grandfather, the Baal Shem Tov, may he rest in Eden, illuminated this passage. He said that teivah actually means 'word', and the meaning of making an opening for the word is that you should be careful to bring light into the words that come from your lips. The verse continues: "Make bottom and second and third floors." This seems to be what my grandfather related to me, saying that in every word are worlds, souls, and divinities. This is what is meant by teivah, speech, which also has at its most basic level worlds. The second level is also known as mishneh, secondary, which has the same letters as neshamah, soul - this is the level of souls. And the third level (shelishim) is divinities, which is hinted at in the verse (Exodus 14:7), "Officers (shalishim) [ruling] over all of them," like the Divine who rules over all things. All of these levels you should "Make" - the speech and the word coming out of your mouth should have this intention and be in complete faithfulness, knowing that in each act of speech there are bottom and second and third levels, the worlds, souls and divinities --- Understand this!
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Baal Shem Tov
The Baal Shem Tov, may his memory guard us, would explain the verse (Genesis 6:16) "Make an opening (tzohar) for the ark (teivah)." Tzohar actually means light, and teivah actually means speech. This means that when a Jew wants to speak, they must make sure that one's thought illuminates the words first, because thought (machshavah) is the same letters and connected to chashav mah, 'think of the object'.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Baal Shem Tov
My grandfather of blessed memory explained the secret of the verse (Genesis 6:16) "lower and second and third decks" - that one should make ones petitions from the letters, from the mystery of the divine light that dwells within them, and make the petition come from there, etc.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
"And Noach found favour in the Lord’s eyes.” If a person finds favour in the eyes of the Lord, then he becomes a נח, i.e. the word being derived from מנוחה, rest, G’d being at rest concerning such a person. When we speak of G’d being מגן אברהם, “the shield of Avraham,” this reflects a reaction by G’d to Avraham who personifies the virtue of חסד, loving kindness, so that G’d protects, מגן, such a person. Similarly if we speak of מגן דוד, “shield of David;” seeing that David personifies the attribute of מלכות, “Royalty” in Jewish history, G’d will act as the shield of David or his descendants, as the title “king” cannot be applied to a person who does not have a people to rule over. G’d must therefore be a shield for the King’s people, if He approves of the King.
This idea is reflected in the Midrash on Genesis 2,2 ויכל אלוקים ביום השביעי, “on the seventh day G’d concluded His work.“ He did so because the Sabbath symbolizes Royalty as is evident from the writings of the Ari’zal.
[According to Pirke de Rabbi Eliezer, chapter 18, the fact that G’d is not described as either “creating” the seventh day, or “performing any work” on the seventh day, and we do not find the phrase: ויהי ערב ויהי בוקר יום שביעי, “it was evening, it was morning, the seventh day,” in connection with this day, this is significant. G’d used the seventh day to survey earth and especially the crown of creation, man, whom He had made on the sixth day. He entertained great hopes for man, and indirectly for Himself, when man would choose to serve Him. He used the Sabbath as a King reviews his army, man being equivalent to G’d’s “army” on earth, He being the Commander-in-Chief. Ed.]
This idea is reflected in the Midrash on Genesis 2,2 ויכל אלוקים ביום השביעי, “on the seventh day G’d concluded His work.“ He did so because the Sabbath symbolizes Royalty as is evident from the writings of the Ari’zal.
[According to Pirke de Rabbi Eliezer, chapter 18, the fact that G’d is not described as either “creating” the seventh day, or “performing any work” on the seventh day, and we do not find the phrase: ויהי ערב ויהי בוקר יום שביעי, “it was evening, it was morning, the seventh day,” in connection with this day, this is significant. G’d used the seventh day to survey earth and especially the crown of creation, man, whom He had made on the sixth day. He entertained great hopes for man, and indirectly for Himself, when man would choose to serve Him. He used the Sabbath as a King reviews his army, man being equivalent to G’d’s “army” on earth, He being the Commander-in-Chief. Ed.]
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Kedushat Levi
A completely different approach to the phrase ונח מצא חן בעיני ה': when the tzaddik, righteous person, finds something that appeals to him, he endeavours to use it or part of it, to enhance his service of the Creator. When he sees a person enthusiastically preparing to commit a sin, he reflects that he should be equally if not even more enthusiastic in his service of the Lord, i.e. he uses even negative phenomena to sublimate them and use them positively, constructively. The Torah in Genesis 6,2-reported on the elite of mankind, בני אלו-הים selecting בנות האדם, morally inferior women, as their mates, showing thereby that they considered these women as possessing חן, “charm, grace,” possessing desirable qualities. The Torah testifies that Noach resisted such attractions, though he had found them. He willed himself to be attracted to G’d instead, exhorting His qualities, instead of the shallow qualities exuded by the בנות האדם.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy