Hebrajska Biblia
Hebrajska Biblia

Komentarz do Wyjścia 28:10

שִׁשָּׁה֙ מִשְּׁמֹתָ֔ם עַ֖ל הָאֶ֣בֶן הָאֶחָ֑ת וְאֶת־שְׁמ֞וֹת הַשִּׁשָּׁ֧ה הַנּוֹתָרִ֛ים עַל־הָאֶ֥בֶן הַשֵּׁנִ֖ית כְּתוֹלְדֹתָֽם׃

Sześć z imion ich na kamieniu jednym, a imiona sześciu pozostałych na kamieniu drugim, podług urodzenia ich. 

Rashi on Exodus

כתולדתם ACCORDING TO THEIR BIRTH — in the order in which they were born: Reuben, Simeon, Levi, Judah, Dan, Naphtali upon one, and upon the other Gad, Asher, Issachar, Zebulun, Joseph and Benjamin — the last name being written full (plene, with a י before the last letter, thus: בנימין) for that is how it is written in the passage that tells of his birth (Genesis 35:18). This gives twenty-five letters on each stone (cf. Sotah 36a).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Or HaChaim on Exodus

ששה משמותם על האבן האחת, "Six of their names on the one stone, etc." Why did the Torah use the unusual expression משמותם, "of their names," instead of saying simply ששה שמות, "six names," etc.? Besides, the word הנותרים, "the remaining ones," is quite unnecessary as we all know that there were only a total of twelve tribes. We are therefore forced to conclude that the adjective "the remaining ones," implies that the latter six tribes were inferior to the the first six. We find something similar after the death of Nadav and Avihu, where the Torah describes Eleazar and Ittamar as the "remaining" sons of Aaron (Leviticus 10,12). Our sages in Yuma 87 describe the word הנותרים as referring to something inferior, using the word in Leviticus as their example. Bereshit Rabbah 73,9 discusses Genesis 30,36 where the Torah speaks about "the remaining flocks of Laban," and also describes the word "remaining" as referring to something inferior. If the meaning of the word הנותרים in our verse were to indicate that these tribes were inferior, this is most surprising seeing that the Torah underlines that they were recorded כתולדותם, "in the order of their (their founder's) birth." Why would the sons born to Jacob later be inferior to those born to him earlier? This seems especially unlikely seeing that Joseph was Jacob's favorite and is known as "Joseph the righteous." How could he be considered "inferior?" Moreover, we find that amongst the first 6 names listed are sons of the maidservants whereas several of the names inscribed on the second stone were of sons born by Jacob's true wives!
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Rabbeinu Bahya

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Siftei Chakhamim

Dostępne tylko dla członków Premium

Rav Hirsch on Torah

Dostępne tylko dla członków Premium

Daat Zkenim on Exodus

Dostępne tylko dla członków Premium

Or HaChaim on Exodus

Dostępne tylko dla członków Premium

Or HaChaim on Exodus

Dostępne tylko dla członków Premium

Or HaChaim on Exodus

Dostępne tylko dla członków Premium

Or HaChaim on Exodus

Dostępne tylko dla członków Premium

Or HaChaim on Exodus

Dostępne tylko dla członków Premium

Or HaChaim on Exodus

Dostępne tylko dla członków Premium

Or HaChaim on Exodus

Dostępne tylko dla członków Premium

Or HaChaim on Exodus

Dostępne tylko dla członków Premium

Or HaChaim on Exodus

Dostępne tylko dla członków Premium

Or HaChaim on Exodus

Dostępne tylko dla członków Premium

Or HaChaim on Exodus

Dostępne tylko dla członków Premium

Or HaChaim on Exodus

Dostępne tylko dla członków Premium
Poprzedni wersetCały rozdziałNastępny werset