Halakhah do Wyjścia 29:34

That He prohibited us from eating piggul. And piggul is a sacrifice that was spoiled by the inention at the time of its slaughter or the time of its being offered - [in that] the man who was occupied with its being offered thought that he would eat it after its time. And it is explained completely in the second [chapter] of Zevachim (Zevachim 27). Indeed, the prohibition about eating piggul is from, "it shall not be eaten because it is holy" (Exodus 29:34) - as we explained with the previous commandment. However we have learned the punishment from His saying about piggul in [Parashat Tzav], "And if any of the flesh of the sacrifice of [his] peace-offering be eaten at all on the third day, [etc.]" (Leviticus 7:18). And the tradition about this verse appeared [and taught] that it was speaking about a sacrifice that was spoiled by intention at the time of its offering; and that is called piggul. And in His saying, "be eaten," He indeed meant that he intended to eat it on the third day. They said (Zevachim 29a), "Open your ear to hear that the verse is speaking about one who intends to eat from his sacrifice on the third day" - that it is disqualified with that intention. And one who eats from it after that intention is liable for excision, due to His saying, "and the person who eats of it shall bear his iniquity." [As] He had said about notar, "So everyone who eats it shall bear his iniquity" (Leviticus 19:8). And in the Gemara, Keritot (Keritot 5a), they said, "A verbal analogy should never be regarded lightly in your eyes, as piggul is one of the essential laws of the Torah, and Scripture taught it only through a verbal analogy. [... It is learned from notar, by way of the common use of the word, iniquity.] It is written there, 'So everyone who eats it shall bear his iniquity,' and it is written here, 'and the person who eats of it shall bear his iniquity.' Just as there, it is excision; here too, it is excision." And also one who eats piggul inadvertently must bring a fixed sin-offering. And the regulations of piggul and notar have already been explained in many places in the Order of Kodashim. (See Parashat Tetzaveh; Mishneh Torah, Sacrifices Rendered Unfit 18.)

And yet its warning – meaning to say, the explicit negative commandment, besides the punishment that is mentioned here – is from that which is written in the inauguration [of the tabernacle], "it shall not be eaten, as it is holy" (Exodus 29:34). And they, may their memory be blessed, said (Pesachim 24a) that this verse includes in its warning all that which has been spoiled of the [sacrifices] and is not fitting to eat, like notar and piggul. And likewise did they, may their memory be blessed, say (Avodah Zarah 66a) that they are included in the warnings, "You shall not eat any abomination" (Deuteronomy 14:3) – which they expounded (Chullin 114b), "Anything that is abominable for me, is forbidden to eat." And since this is so, we shall say that [that warning (negative commandment) is to make one liable for] additional negative commandments; and the verse here is speaking about the punishment of the one who eats it, as so did the explanation come about it. And that which it stated (Leviticus 7:18), "If it shall surely be eaten on the third day," is meaning to say that he thought about it to eat it on the third day. As so did they, may their memory be blessed, expound (Zevachim 29a), "'And if it shall surely be eaten, etc.' – that is piggul." Bend your ear to hear that the verse is speaking about one who thinks to eat his sacrifice on the third day, that it is spoiled with this thought. And one who eats it is liable for excision, as it is stated about it, "and the soul that eats from it will carry his iniquity." And it is stated about notar (Leviticus 19:8), "And the one who eats it will carry his iniquity, as he has profaned the holy of the Lord, and he shall be excised." And we learned [about] it in Keritot 5a, "Let not an inferential comparison (gezara shava) be light in your eyes; as behold piggul is one of the [important] bodies of Torah, and Scripture only taught it through a gezara shava." As we learn it] from notar, from [the use of] ‘iniquity’ [in both cases] – "just like there it is excision, here too it is excision."