Midrasz do Powtórzonego Prawa 32:2

(Fol. 7) R. Abahu said: "The day of rain is of great importance, even more so than the day of resurrection; for the day of resurrection is only for the righteous, while rain falls for all alike, for the righteous as well as for the wicked." This is different from R. Joseph's contention; for R. Joseph said: "The act of rain is just as important as the day of resurrection; it was therefore inserted in the benediction for the resurrection of the dead [the second section of the Amida]." R. Juda said: "The day of rain is as great as the day on which the Torah was given; for it is said (Deut. 32, 2) My doctrine shall drop as the rain; doctrine refers to the Torah; for it is said (Prov. 4, 2) For good doctrine do I give you; my law must ye not forsake." Rab said: "The day of rain is even greater than the day on which the Law was given; for it is said (Deut. 32, 2) My doctrine shall drop as the rain. Now, which depends upon which? Surely the smaller [the doctrine] depends upon the bigger thing [the rain]?!" Raba pointed out the following contradiction: It is written (Deut. 22, 2) My doctrine shall drop as the rain, [which is not always good]; and further it is written. My speech shall trickle as the dew, [which is always good]; i.e., if the scholar is worthy, consider him as the dew; but, if he is not, turn your neck to him [as we do to rain]."

Variantly: "I am the L rd your G d": When the Holy One Blessed be He arose and proclaimed "I am the L rd your G d," the earth took ill, as it is written (Judges 5:4) "O L rd, when You came forth from Seir, when You strode from the field of Edom, the earth shook; the heavens, too, dripped," and (Ibid. 5) "Mountains dripped before the L rd," and (Psalms 29:4) "The voice of the L rd in strength; the voice of the L rd in glory!" … (Ibid. 9) "And in His sanctuary all proclaim "'Glory!'" Until their houses were suffused with the splendor of the Shechinah… And it was for this reason that the nations of the world were solicited (to accept the Torah.) So as not to give them a pretext vis-à-vis the Shechinah — to say: Had we been solicited, we would have accepted it. They were solicited and did not accept it! As it is written (Devarim 33:2) "And he said: L rd came from Sinai, etc." He came and revealed Himself to the sons of the wicked Esav and asked them: Will you accept the Torah? They: What is written in it? He: "You shall not kill." They: But this is what we have inherited from our father, as it is written (Genesis 27:40) "By your sword shall you live!" He revealed Himself to the sons of Ammon and Moav and asked them: Will you accept the Torah? They: What is written in it? He: "You shall not commit adultery." They: But we are all the sons of incest, as it is written (Genesis 19:36) "And the two daughters of Lot conceived by their father." How, then, shall we accept it? He came and revealed Himself to the sons of Ishmael and asked them: Will you accept the Torah? They: What is written in it? He: "You shall not steal." They: But this is the blessing by which our father was blessed, as it is written (Genesis 16:12) "And he (Ishmael) shall be a brutish man, etc." And when He came to Israel (Devarim 32:2), "in His right hand, the fire of the Law for them," they all opened their mouths and cried (Exodus 24:7) "All that the L rd says, we shall do and we shall hear!" And thus is it written (Habakkuk 3:6) "He stood and measured the land; He looked and dispersed the nations." R. Shimon b. Elazar said: If the sons of Noach could not abide by the seven mitzvoth commanded them, how much more so (could they not abide) by all the mitzvoth of the Torah! An analogy: A king appoints two caretakers, one over stores of grain, and one over stores of silver and gold. The first bridles at not having been appointed over the stores of silver and gold, and the second says to him: Empty one, if you were faithless with grain, how much more so with silver and gold! If the sons of Noach could not abide by seven mitzvoth alone, how much more so (could they not abide by the six hundred and thirteen mitzvoth (of the Torah)! Why was the Torah not given in Eretz Yisrael? So as not to provide a pretext to the nations of the world, viz.: Because it was not given in our land, that is why we did not accept it. Variantly: So as not to rouse contention among the tribes, one saying, it was given in my land; the other: it was given in my land. That is why it was given in the open desert. In three settings was the Torah given — desert, fire, and water. Just as these are free for all, so, Torah.

R. Juda said in the name of Rab: "What is the meaning of the passage (Deut. 32, 2) My doctrine shall drop as the rain? This refers to the westerly winds which come from the hind part of the world; my speech shall distill as the dew; this refers to the northerly wind, which causes gold to become cheap (it brings hunger, and that renders gold cheap) and so the verse reads (Is. 46, 6) Those that lavish gold out of the bag; as heavy rains upon the grass, refers to the easterly wind that makes storms in the world; and as showers upon herbs, refers to the southerly wind, which brings beneficient rain and causes the growth of grasses." We are taught in a Baraitha that R. Eliezer says: "The world (Ib. b) is like a balcony (without a fourth wall); and when the sun arrives in the evening at the north west corner, it is diverted by this wind and ascends above the sky." R. Joshua says: "The world is like a tent (which is fenced on all sides), and when the sun arrives in the evening at the northwest corner, it turns around and returns beyond the sky; as it is said (Eccl. 1, 6) Going toward the south, and turning around toward the north, the wind moveth around about continually; and around its circles doth the wind return again; i.e., toward the south during the day; and toward the north during the night. Moveth round about, etc.; i.e. it faces east and west, so that sometimes, when the days are long, it goes through them, and when the days are short, it goes around them." R. Juda, aforementioned, therefore is in accordance with R. Eliezer. (Job. 37, 9) Out of his chamber cometh the whirlwind. This refers to the southern wind; and that of the north, the cold, refers to the northern wind. From the breathing of God ice is given, refers to the westerly wind; and the broad waters become solid, refers to the easterly wind. But did not the master say that the south wind brings beneficient rain, etc? This presents no difficulty: If the rain comes slowly, it makes the grass grow; but if it comes down in torrents, it does harm. R. Chisda said: "What is the meaning of the passage (Ib., ib. 22) The golden light that cometh out of the north? This refers to the northerly wind, which makes gold cheap, as it is written (Is. 46, 6) Those that lavish gold out of the bag." Raphram b. Papa, in the name of R. Chisda, said: "Since the Temple was destroyed, the southerly wind has never brought rain, as it is written (Is. 9, 9) And he snatcheth on the right hand, and is yet hungry; and he eateth on the left hand, and is not yet satisfied; and it is also written (Ps. 89, 13) The north and the south — these hast Thou created." etc. Raphram b. Papa said further in the name of R. Chisda: "Since the Temple was destroyed, the rains do not come from the good treasure; as it is said (Deut. 28, 12) The Lord will open unto thee His good treasure, the heaven, to give the rain of thy land, etc., i.e., when Israel did the will of the Omnipotent, and Israel was in his own land, the rain came from the good treasure; and now that Israel is no more in his own land, the rain does not come from the good treasure."