Talmud do Wyjścia 12:46

If he broke a bone of it when it still was daylight. There are Tannaim who state, he is liable, and there are Tannaim who state, he is not liable⁵¹Babli 84b.. He who says that he is liable, do not break a bone in it⁵²Ex. 12:46. etc., in any case. But he who says that he is not liable, at a time when he is not obligated to eat fire-roasted there is no do not break a bone in it; at a time when he is obligated to eat fire-roasted there is do not break a bone in it.

MISHNAH: One who eats First Fruits before he recited over them³³First Fruits have to be eaten by the priest (Deut. 12:17) after the Temple ceremony. This point is in dispute between R. Aqiba and others., or most holy sacrifices outside the Temple enclosure³⁴They are restricted to priests (Lev.10:15)., or simple sacrifices or Second Tithe outside of the wall³⁵Lev. 10:14 for priests, Deut. 12:17 for others.. One who breaks a bone of a pure Passover sacrifice is flogged 40 [lashes]³⁶Ex. 12:46.. But one who leaves over of the pure³⁷Example of a prohibition subordinated to a positive commandment; cf. Note 1. or breaks a bone of the impure³⁸It lost its holiness. is not flogged 40 [lashes].

HALAKHAH: “It is written, do not remove any meat from the house to the outside³²⁵Ex. 12:46.. I have not only outside the house, from where outside the group? The verse says, do not remove to the outside.”³²⁶Babli 86a, Tosephta 6:11, Mekhilta dR. Ismael Bol 15 (p. 55), dR. Simeon bar Yoḥai p. 36, Tanḥuma Bo 10, also cf. the Targumim. Rebbi Yudan said, from here that he makes himself liable if he (said I am) [removed] away from the group³²⁷The text in parentheses is the scribe’s, the one in brackets the corrector’s. Since in the corrector’s text R. Yudan adds nothing to the baraita, the scribe’s text must be the correct one. If a person (after the pouring of the blood) declares himself not to be part of his group, he commits a sin.. Rebbi Mana said, the verse should have said, do not remove to the outside, and we would have said, if he makes himself liable outside the group, not so much more outside the house³²⁸The mention of the house seems to be superfluous. Mekhilta dR. Ismael disagrees; the meat becomes disqualified and impure only by being removed to the outside.?