Talmud do Liczb 28:7
וְנִסְכּוֹ֙ רְבִיעִ֣ת הַהִ֔ין לַכֶּ֖בֶשׂ הָאֶחָ֑ד בַּקֹּ֗דֶשׁ הַסֵּ֛ךְ נֶ֥סֶךְ שֵׁכָ֖ר לַיהוָֽה׃
A zalewka jej - czwarta część hynu na jagnię jedno; na świętém miejscu wylewać będziesz zalewkę mocną Wiekuistemu.
Jerusalem Talmud Megillah
It was stated in the name of Rebbi Simeon521Tosephta Zevaḥim13:15. The only sacrifices authorized on a public altar are those fixed beforehand, not depending on circumstances. In the Tosephta, the statement is attributed to R. Jehudah. But since the following text starts with “in addition, R. Simeon says …”, the prior text must be R. Simeon’s (Note of Pene Moshe.): “The community only brings what Scripture fixed for it.” Rebbi Simeon is of the opinion that since when Second Tithe was introduced it was not interrupted522This statement does not belong here, it was copied from Halakhah 14. Second Tithe is the farmer’s property to be consumed in purity “before the Eternal” (Deut. 14:23). When the Tent was at Nob, the altar at Gibeon, and the Ark at Qiryat Yearim, it is difficult to see where “before the Eternal” was. He posits that the duty of Second Tithe was in force in the interval between Siloh and Solomon’s Temple.. What is between them523R. Simeon and the majority who permit on the public altar anything sacrificed in the desert.? Rebbi Abba bar Mamal said, the bull of hidden things524Lev. 4:13–21, the purification offering for erroneous acts of the community. is between them. Rebbi Yose says, voluntary offerings of the community are between them. It was stated, both men and women525May sacrifice on a private altar.. Rebbi Joḥanan said, there is no woman here, “man” is written in the paragraph526Deut. 12:8.. It was stated, also a nazir’s sacrifices527May be brought on a private altar. Babli Temurah 14b.. Rebbi Joḥanan said, there are no nazir’s sacrifices here; nazir’s sacrifices are an obligation. It was stated, also libations528As detailed in Num. 15:1–16, required for the sacrifices authorized on private altars. Babli Zevaḥim 111a.. Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Abun said, he who states “libations” does not hold with Rebbi, as it was stated, Rebbi says, I am saying that also after Israel entered the Land, libations only are brought inside529At the altar standing in a sanctified enclosure of the Tabernacle.. What is the reason? In the Sanctuary pour alcoholic libations to the Eternal530Num. 28:7.. A prohibition is written only for inside; from where for the outside? Let us hear from the following. From where that one who slaughters as Pesah for an individual on a private altar or the public altar in a time where altars are forbidden, that he transgresses a prohibition? The verse says, you may not slaughter the Pesaḥ at one531Deut. 16:6, read as: only at one place for all of Israel.. He is punished with extirpation and you are saying so532Since the sacrifice as described is one at an unauthorized place and this is punished by extirpation (Lev. 17:4), whereas the verse quoted treats this as a simple misdemeanor.? Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish said, this is about one who slaughters in the afternoon not for its name533Which disqualifies the sacrifice from fulfilling any obligation; Mishnah Zevaḥim 1:1. in a time when altars are permitted. Then why does he say, in a time when altars are forbidden? In a time when his altar is forbidden534Since Pesaḥ may not be brought on a private altar and is a modified well-being offering, a private altar on the afternoon of the 14th of Nisan is disqualified for any kind of well-being offering.. Why not for its name? That you should not say, it is well-being offering535An animal vowed for Pesaḥ but not used for this purpose automatically is dedicated as well-being offering. and qualified. In addition, from the following: I could think that if he slaughtered it in the afternoon it should be qualified. Why do you have (in the afternoon it should be qualified) [in the morning it should be disqualified]536The corrector’s text is to be deleted.? No. It is not for its name533Which disqualifies the sacrifice from fulfilling any obligation; Mishnah Zevaḥim 1:1.. Rebbi Yose said, this implies that well-being sacrifices brought because of Pesaḥ536The corrector’s text is to be deleted. are qualified on an altar. Would an elevation offering be brought because of a reparation sacrifice be qualified on an altar according to Rebbi Eleazar? Let us hear from the following: “This is the principle: Anything which can be vowed or donated223Dedications of animals as Temple sacrifices. is sacrificed on a private altar; but nothing which cannot be vowed or donated is sacrificed on a private altar.”
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy