Mas se o sacerdote examinar a praga da <span class="x" onmousemove="Show('perush','O termo em português é dermatológico, e significa: infecção da pele e seus anexos por fungos de diversos gên. (Microsporum, Tricophyton, Epidermophyton e Keratomyces); porrigem. Eu, porém, não sei até que ponto há fidelidade ao que consta no texto hebraico, pois desconheço os casos, e não sou médico. Mas, lembremos que com ou sem a listagem trazida aqui por nomes científicos, ou seja, memo por declaração medicinal de saúde dermatológico, a questão aqui é a purificação ou impurificação. Nada tem a ver com contágio enfermício.');" onmouseout="Hide('perush');">tinha</span>, e ela não parecer mais profunda que a pele, e nela não houver pêlo preto, o sacerdote encerrará por sete dias o que tem a praga da tinha.
Rashi on Leviticus
ושער שחור אין בו AND THERE IS NO BLACK HAIR IN IT [THE PRIEST SHALL SHUT HIM UP] — Consequently, if there is black hair in it, he is clean, and does not require to be shut up — for black hair is a characteristic of cleanness in cases of נתקים, as it is stated, (v. 37) “if there is black hair grown up in it … [he is clean]” (Sifra, Tazria Parashat Nega'im, Chapter 8 9).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Rashbam on Leviticus
ושער שחור אין בו והסגיר, if there had been black hair the person would be ritually completely pure and does not need to be isolated even for further examination purposes. This is spelled out clearly in verse 37.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Siftei Chakhamim
If there was a black hair in it, he is [ritually] clean. [Rashi explains this] so that you will not explain: “And behold! it does not appear deeper than the skin,” even if it has a black hair, and I might think that a black hair is a sign of impurity, or if it has no black hair, even if its appearance is deeper than the skin, it requires confinement, and the ו of ושער שחור is like או (or). Therefore, Rashi explains that everything depends on the black hair, as it says: “And a black hair [grew in it, the nesek is healed, he is clean].”
