Midrash sobre Provérbios 20:4

Another explanation: "This commandment etc... is not in heaven." Moses said to them, "Do not say that another Moses stood and brought to us a different Torah from the Heavens, I already informed you all that it is not in Heaven, nothing of it remains in the Heavens." Another explanation: Rabbi Chanina said, It (the Torah) and all the vessels of belief in It were given; "its' humility, its' justice, its' integrity, and the gift of its' reward. Another possibility: What does, "It is not in Heaven" mean? Shmuel said, The Torah was not commanded in astrological signs since belief in them is in the heavens. They said to Shmuel, but hey, aren't you an astrologer and also great in Torah? He said to them, I only look at the astrological signs when I am free from the Torah. When is that? When I enter the bathhouse. Another possibility, "It is not in Heaven." They said to Moses our Teacher, but hey, you said to us, "It's not in Heaven, it's not on the other side of the sea, but where is it? he said to them, in the place that is close, in your mouths, and in your hearts to do it, it is not from from you, it is close to you all. Another possibility, "In your mouths and in your hearts to do it." The Rabbis said, Shlomo said seven things about the lazy person, but what Moses said was greater than all of them. What did they say to the lazy person? Your rabbi in the city goes and learns Torah from us? But he argued with them and responded. I am afraid from the lion on the way. From where is this learned? (Proverbs 26:13) A lazy man says, “There’s a cub on the road" They said to him, "But hey, your rabbi in the country stands and goes with him." He replied to them, "I'm afraid that there will not be a lion in the street, for it says,"a lion in the street"(proverbs 26:13) They said to him, "But hey, the lazy one lives with/in your house. He said to them, "And the lion is outside. They said to him, "Inside the house, he replied to them and said, (what happens) if I am walking and find the door locked, I return and come? They said to him, it is open, and from where do you know that

(Fol. 105) R. Juda said in the name of R. Assi: "Those who issue decrees in Jerusalem obtained their salaries up to ninety nine manath from the Temple fund. Karna the Judge was accustomed to take a silver coin called Istara from the one who won the case, and an Istara from the one who lost the case; and then he would decide the case. How did he do so? Is there not a passage (Ex. 33, 8) And thou shalt take no bribe? This was merely a payment for the time he was taking from his own business. Everyone understands that he is entitled to it, just as R. Huna conducted himself. Whenever he came to court he would say: "Get me a man to irrigate my field in my stead, then I will take up your case." R. Abahu said: "Come, see, how much bribe causes to blind the eyes of those who accept it. If a man feels a pain in his eyes he pays a doctor, although it is doubtful whether he will cure him or whether he will not cure him. But these judges accepting bribes take the amount of a p'ruta, which will surely make their eyes blind, as it is said (Deut. 17, 19) For the bribe blindeth the eyes of the wise." Our Rabbis were taught, For the bribe blindeth the eyes of the wise. Surely so the eyes of the foolish. And perverteth the words of the righteous. Surely so the eyes of the wicked. How can then foolish become judges? We must, therefore explain it thus: For the bribe blindeth the eyes, etc., that even a great scholar, but one who takes bribes, will not depart from the world until he will become blind; and perverted the words of the righteous, (Ib. b) even a perfect righteous man, but one who takes bribes, will not depart from the world without having his mind confused. When R. Dimi came he said that R. Nachman b. Cahana expounded: "What is the meaning of the following passage (Pr. 20, 4) The king by justice establishes the [welfare of a] land; but one that loveth gifts overthroweth it? This means, if a judge is like a king who receives nothing, then he will establish the land; but if he will be like a priest who receives gifts from the threshing floor he will ruin it." Raba b. R. Sila said: "A judge who has to lend something is disqualified from becoming a judge, [because of being compelled to favor people.]" This is only said when he has nothing to lend to others; but if he has something to lend to others in return, it does not make any difference. Raba said: "What is the reason that a bribe is prohibited? Because as soon as a man takes a bribe he becomes intimate with that man like himself, and a man never sees a wrong thing against himself." What is the meaning of the word Shochad (bribe)? It means "which causes to become one (Shehuchad) R. Papa said: "A man should never be a judge to decide a case for his intimate friend, nor to a real enemy. To an intimate friend he should not, because he will never find any faults against him; and to a real enemy, because he will never find a defense for him." Abaye said: "The reason why a scholar is beloved by his townspeople is [not because they consider him superior to themselves, but] because he does not rebuke them, for not performing Heavenly duties."

R. Shimon b. Yochai says: An analogy: Two brothers are counting money after their father's (death). One exchanges a dinar (for food) and eats it; the other exchanges it and sets (the exchange) aside. The first remains with nothing; the other, after some time, finds himself wealthy. Thus with a Torah scholar: If he learns two or three things a day, two or three chapters a week, two or three sections a month, after some time he finds himself "wealthy." Of such a one it is written (Proverbs 13:11) "… That (treasure) gathered with the hand will increase." And if one says "Today I will study (Torah)"; "Tomorrow I will study"; "Today I will learn (Mishnah)"; "Tomorrow I will learn," in the end he remains with nothing. Of such a one it is written (Ibid. 10:5) "One who sleeps in harvest time is a shameful son," and (Ibid. 20:4) "Because of the (cold of) winter, the sluggard will not plow." And it is written (Ibid. 24:30) "By the field of a lazy man I passed": This is one who acquired a field in the past; "and by the vineyard of a man lacking a heart": This is one who acquired a vineyard (in the past). Since he acquired a field and acquired a vineyard, and did not work in them, whence is it derived that he is bound to be called "lazy"? From "By the field of a lazy man I passed and by the vineyard of a man lacking a heart." Why is he called "lacking a heart"? Because he acquired a field and a vineyard and did not work in them. And whence is it derived that he (such a Torah scholar) is bound to leave (unlearned) two or three things in a section? From (Ibid. 31) "and, behold, it was all grown over with thorns." And whence is it derived that he will seek the opening of a section and not find it? From "nettles had covered (i.e., concealed) its face ('opening')." And it is written further "and its stone wall was broken down." Because it ("its face") is not ready to hand, he sits and rules unclean what is clean, and clean what is unclean, and he breaks down the fences of the sages. What is the punishment of such a one? Solomon came and delineated it through the tradition (kabbalah), (Koheleth 10:8) "and the breaker of a fence will be bitten by a snake." For all who break the fences of the sages are destined to be punished.