Êxodo 22:5 Passagens Relacionadas

Israel were redeemed from Egypt for five reasons. [Because of the term,]⁷³Corrector’s addition, to be deleted. because of tribulation, because of entreaty, because of the merit of the Fathers, because of repentance, because of the term⁷⁴The predetermined date for their rescue, Gen. 15:13.. That is what is written⁷⁵Ex. 2:23–25., it was in these important times that the Children of Israel were sighing at the work and crying, because of tribulation; and God heard their wailing, because of entreaty; and God remembered His Covenant, because of the merit of the Fathers. And God saw the children of Israel, because of repentance⁷⁶Pseudo-Jonathan (Ex. 2:25) reads saw and knew as parallels, matters that only God knew or saw: The Eternal saw the pain of the servitude of the Children of Israel and their individual repentance was evident before Him, since no one knew of his neighbor’s., and God knew, because of the term. And so it says⁷⁷Deut. 4:30–31., if you are in trouble, because of tribulation; and all these matters will find you in future times and you will repent, because of repentance; for the Eternal, your God, is a merciful power, because of mercy; He will not let you sink nor destroy you, nor will He forget your Fathers’ Covenant, because of the merit of the Fathers. And so it says⁷⁸Ps. 106:44–46., He saw how they were in trouble, because of tribulation; when He heard their prayer, because of entreaty; and remembered for them His Covenant, because of merit of the Fathers; and consoled them in the abundance of His grace, because of repentance; and He had mercy with them, because of mercy.

HALAKHAH: “He who sets a fire which consumes wood,⁸⁴The full verse reads: “If fire gets out of control and finds thorns, or consumes a stack of sheaves, or standing grain, or the field, the person who set the blaze shall certainly pay.” Similar discussions on what the different examples mentioned in the verse imply are in the Babli 60a, Mekhilta dR. Ismael, Neziqin 14 (ed. Horovitz-Rabin p. 297), Mekhilta dR. Simeon ben Ioḥai p. 196.” etc. Since thorns are flammable, do I only include flammable material? The verse says, “a stack”. Since a stack of sheaves is particular in that it was harvested, do I only include harvested material? The verse says, “standing grain.” Since all of these are particular in that they are flammable, do I only include flammable material? If it swept his furrow or damaged his stone, from where? The verse says, “or the field.⁸⁵The earth constituting the field.” Should it only have mentioned thorns, standing grain, and stack, but not mentioned field? In the opinion of Rebbi Jehudah⁸⁶Mishnah 7. Since R. Jehudah requires the arsonist to pay for everything of value stored inside the stack, nothing of value would have been excluded if “field” had not been mentioned. this is acceptable since he says, he pays for everything inside. But according to the rabbis, who say that he only pays for a stack of wheat or barley sheaves, why did it mention “field”⁸⁷To include stones and require the arsonist also to pay for the work needed to plough the field anew., why did it mention “stack”⁸⁸To include everything stacked, even limestone assembled to be burned into lime (Mekhilta dR. Ismael).?