וְיָצְאָ֖ה מִבֵּית֑וֹ וְהָלְכָ֖ה וְהָיְתָ֥ה לְאִישׁ־אַחֵֽר׃
e ela sair da casa dele e for embora, tornando-se esposa de outro homem,
Jerusalem Talmud Sotah
257Parallels in Babli Giṭṭin 90a/b; Tosephta 5:9, Num. rabba 9(8). It was stated in the name of Rebbi Meïr: Just as there are opinions in eating and drinking, so opinions are [varied] among men. There is a man, if a fly falls into his cup, he takes it out, throws it away and drinks. That is like a normal man who sees his wife talking to her neighbors and relatives258Males. (In one version of the Tosephta, קְרוֹבוֹתֶיהָ “female relatives” but S. Lieberman comments on it as קְרוֹבֶיהָ without remark.) It may be that this refers to the case where the wife talks overly long to her male neighbors.. Or you have a man who if a fly flies over his cup, takes it, pours [the contents] out, and does not taste them. That is a bad human attitude because he thinks of divorcing her259Just as the fly did not touch the cup, the wife did nothing wrong; the husband simply looks for an excuse to divorce her without paying.. Or you have a man who, if a fly sits on his cup, takes it and leaves [the cup] untouched. That is Pappos ben Jehudah who locked his wife in. They said to him, did your forefathers behave like this260This Aramaic sentence is a commentary of the Talmud; it is not in the other sources.? Or you have a man who finds a dead fly in his cup, takes it, licks it, and drinks. That is the wicked one who sees that his wife is overbearing with her slaves and slave-girls261This argument (not found in the Babli, but found in Tosephta and Midrash) seems to contradict the statement of Mishnah 6 that every woman is supposed to feel superior to her slaves. The meaning here seems to be that she has no inhibitions to appear in undress before her slaves., where he would be commanded to divorce her262The other sources have a long list of indecent behavior of the wife that should force the husband to divorce her; cf. Mishnah Ketubot 7:6., as it is said: “She left his house and went and married another man.” The verse called him other because he is not of the class of the first who expelled his wife because of a sexual transgression and the other one stumbled over her263In the Babli, 6a, this interpretation is part of the legal argument that a woman formally accused by her husband cannot be married in levirate after the husband’s death.. If Heaven gives him credit, he will divorce her; otherwise, at the end she will bury him as it is said, “or if the latter man dies.” That man deserves to die since he brought that woman into his house.