Gênesis 1 Passagens Relacionadas

HALAKHAH: ⁷³This is repeated (mostly by the corrector) from Ta`aniot 4:3, Notes 141–148. Rav Ḥuna said, three people reading in the Torah shall not do less than ten verses. Ḥizqiah said, corresponding to the Ten Commandments [But did we not state, “on Sunday, In the Beginning and there shall be a spread”? And these are only eight! Rebbi Idi said, Cahana and Assi disagreed. One said, he repeats. But the other said, he splits. He who says that he repeats, he repeats two verses. He who says he splits, he splits it was evening, it was morning, as a separate verse. But did we not state, “on Monday, there shall be a spread and the waters shall come together”? He who says that he repeats, he repeats two verses. He who says he splits, he could not split. Rebbi Philippos ben Protos objected before Rebbi Jonah, is there not the paragraph about Amalek? He said to him, there is a difference since this is the topic of the day.] Rebbi Eleazar from Merom asked, was it not stated, the one who reads the conclusion from Prophets should not do less than 21 verses. Should there not be 23? Three for ten, three for ten, and one three⁷⁴He reads the statement of Rav Huna to mean that any time three people read in the Torah they together must read 10 verses. Then on a Sabbath, when 3+3+1 readers are called, they must read a minimum of 23 verses. Corresponding to this the reader from Prophets should have to read 23 verses. The fact that he has to read only 21 shows that we have to read Rav Huna’s remark as referring only to the weekday and Sabbath afternoon readings..

HALAKHAH: ¹⁴¹This Halakhah is repeated in Megillah 4:2. Rav Ḥuna said, three people reading in the Torah shall not do less than ten verses¹⁴²Each one may not read less than three verses but one has to read at least 4. Babli Megillah21b.. Ḥizqiah said, corresponding to the Ten Commandments¹⁴³Babli Megillah 21b, as one of two explanations.. But did we not state, “on Sunday, In the Beginning and there shall be a spread”? And these are only eight! Rebbi Idi said, Cahana and Assi disagreed¹⁴⁴In Babli Megillah 22a, disagreement of Rav and Samuel.. One said, he repeats. But the other said, he splits. He who says that he repeats, he repeats two verses. He who says he splits, he splits it was evening, it was morning, as a separate verse¹⁴⁵He splits it off from v. 5 and reads it as separate sentence. In contrast to the Babli which prescribes only one sentence to be repeated, the Yerushalmi has the three readers reading a total of 10 verses as required by Rav Ḥuna.. But did we not state, “on Monday, there shall be a spread and the waters shall come together”? One said, he repeats. But the other said, he splits. He who says that he repeats, he repeats two verses. He who says he splits, he could not split¹⁴⁶Since “it was evening, it was morning, the third day” already is a separate verse.. Rebbi Philippos ben Perita objected before Rebbi Ze`ira, is there not the paragraph about Amalek? He said to him, there is a difference since this is the topic of the day¹⁴⁷The reading for Purim, for which three readers are called on a weekday, is Ex.17:8–16. The reading is not connected to the text before or after, it cannot be augmented. Since there are 9 verses and the Mishnaic requirement can be satisfied without problems, there is no need to change anything to satisfy the additional Amoraic rule. Tosaphot Megillah 21b s.v. אין.. Rebbi Eleazar from Merom asked before Rebbi Jonah; was it not stated, the one who reads the conclusion from Prophets should not do less than 21 verses¹⁴⁸Babli Megillah 23a. The question would be that since we require that one reader at least read 4 verses, should there not be at least 22 verses? The question needs no answer since there is no reading from Prophets on weekdays; the number 21 refers to the seven people called to read on a Sabbath; cf. Megillah 4:2 Note 74.?