וּלְקַחְתֶּ֨ם לָכֶ֜ם בַּיּ֣וֹם הָרִאשׁ֗וֹן פְּרִ֨י עֵ֤ץ הָדָר֙ כַּפֹּ֣ת תְּמָרִ֔ים וַעֲנַ֥ף עֵץ־עָבֹ֖ת וְעַרְבֵי־נָ֑חַל וּשְׂמַחְתֶּ֗ם לִפְנֵ֛י יְהוָ֥ה אֱלֹהֵיכֶ֖ם שִׁבְעַ֥ת יָמִֽים׃
E tomareis para vós no primeiro dia o fruto de belas árvores, ramos de palmeiras, e ramos de árvores frondosas, e salgueiros de riacho; e vos alegrareis perante Hashem, vosso Deus, por sete dias.
Jerusalem Talmud Sukkah
HALAKHAH: “Lulav and willow six and seven,” etc. 6This paragraph is copied in Ševi`it1:7 (Notes 48–58, שׁ). Rebbi Ze`ira, Rebbi Ila, Rebbi Yasa in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan: The “willow”1The entire Chapter only refers to the service in the Temple. The willow twigs referred to here are not those tied to the lulav; these are subsumed under the name of lulav and are not mentioned further, just as the myrtle branches are not mentioned. The willow twigs are large ones used around the altar, as described in Mishnah 4. The numbers mentioned refer to the number of days the corresponding action is required. If the Sabbath of the holiday week was not the first day, the willow twigs to surround the altar were not brought on the Sabbath. is practice going back to Moses on Mount Sinai. This is against Abba Shaul7Halakhah 3:3, Babli 34a., since Abba Shaul said, the willow is a word of the Torah: and brook willows, two. One willow for the lulav, the other willow for the Temple. Rebbi Abba, Rebbi Ḥiyya in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan: willow and pouring water are practice going back to Moses on Mount Sinai8Babli 34a.. This is against Rebbi Aqiba9In Sifry Num. 250 the argument is given in the name of R. Jehudah ben Bathyra, with different arguments ascribed to R. Aqiba and R. Nathan. The argument notes that in Num. 29 the sacrifices for the different days of Tabernacles are given in stereotyped language; the words noted are deviations from the usual ונסכה, כמשפט. R. Aqiba’s argument is presented differently in the Babli, Zevaḥim 110b., since Rebbi Aqiba said the pouring of water is a word of the Torah: On the second day and their libations10Num. 29:19.. On the sixth say, and its libations11Num. 29:31.. On the seventh day, and its rules12Num. 29:33.. מ י מ spells “water”. Rebbi Ḥiyya bar Abba asked before Rebbi Joḥanan, why does one now plough because of old trees13? He said to him, when the practice was established it was given so that when they desired to plough they might plough. Rebbi Abba bar Zavda in the name of Rebbi Onias from Hauran: Willow, water libation, and ten saplings14The rule (Mishnah Ševi`it1:7) that ten tree saplings planted over a surface area of a bet seah(5’000 square cubits) may be tended up to New Year’s Day. are institution of the prophets15Babli 44a; Moed qaṭan3b.. Do they disagree? Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Abun in the name of Levi: That was the current practice; they forgot it, but the later ones got up and agreed to the opinion of the earlier ones to teach you that everything the court insists on will come to be in the end just as Moses was told on Sinai, as Rebbi Mana said, for it is not an empty word16Deut. 32:47., if it is empty it is from you. Why? Because you do not exert yourselves. Because it is your life; when is it your life? At the time that you exert yourselves. Rebbi Joḥanan said to Rebbi Ḥiyya bar Abba: Babylonian, two things came from you17They are Babylonian customs introduced into Palestine., prostrating oneself on the fast day18Prostrating oneself in the re-enactment of the High Priest’s service on the Day of Atonement (Avodah zarah4:1, Note 18)., and the willow of the seventh day19Using separate willow twigs on the seventh day of Tabernacles in the prayers for winter rains. Confirmed in the Babli, 44a.. The rabbis of Caesarea say, also the moving20According to J. Levy, the root is קזז “to push aside, to move”. It refers to the calendar rule given by R. Simon in the following. It is established in Mishnah Roš Haššanah 2:11–12 that rabbinic Judaism permits a computed calendar which may deviate from the exact astronomical data. This is used to make sure that the Day of Atonement be neither Friday nor Sunday, since in those cases it would be difficult either to prepare a meal for breaking the fast or one to prepare for the fast. The calendar rules allow for one more condition. One prefers that New Year’s day not be on a Sunday, to make sure that the seventh day of Tabernacles not be on the Sabbath, rather than New Year’s Day (and the first day of Tabernacles) not be on the Sabbath, since outside the Temple the shofar may still be blown on the Second Day of the New Year..
Jerusalem Talmud Sukkah
HALAKHAH: It is written, a fruit of the splendor tree, a tree whose fruit is splendor and its wood is splendor. Which one is that? This is the etrog. If you would say, the pomegranate, its (wood) [fruit] is splendor but its (fruit) [wood] is not splendor75It is difficult to decide whether the text of the (scribe) or that of the [corrector] is the correct one. The corrector’s is preferable since (1) it is not parallel to the next sentence and (2) the pomegranate, while not easy to eat, is on the list of preferred fruits of the Holy Land (Deut. 8:8) and certainly tastes much better than carob pods.. If you would say, the carob, its wood is splendor but its fruit is not splendor. Which one is it? The etrog. Hadar; Rebbi Levi said, for it stays on its tree from one year to the next76His Hebrew must pronounce ־ָ as /a/ and make no difference between ד nd דּ since he reads הָדָר “splendor” as הַדָּר “who dwells”.. Rebbi Tanḥuma said, Aquila translated הדָר by ‘ύδωρ 77“Water.” This again makes no difference between ד and דּ but reads ־ָ either as /o/ or as Polish /ó/.; a tree which grows on the water. “Rebbi Simeon ben Ioḥai stated: You shall take for yourselves . . a fruit of the splendor tree, a tree whose fruit is splendor and its wood is splendor; the smell of its fruit is the smell of its wood, the smell of its wood is the smell of its fruit; its fruit looks like its wood, its wood looks like its fruit. Which one is it? The etrog.”78Babli 35a; Sifra Emor Pereq16(4), with different name traditions.
Jerusalem Talmud Sukkah
Rebbi Yose95This possibly might refer to R. Yose the Tanna. The argument that the omission of the connective “and” in the list indicates that the etrog must be kept separate from the other items is ascribed to R. Eleazar (the Tanna) in Sifra Emor Pereq15(7). said, if there were written and date-palm palms, it would be correct. Only date-palm palms is written, even one in one hand and the other in the other hand. They said about Rebbi Aqiba that he entered the synagogue with an etrog on his shoulders96Babli 36b..