Números 5:25 Passagens Relacionadas

וְלָקַ֤ח הַכֹּהֵן֙ מִיַּ֣ד הָֽאִשָּׁ֔ה אֵ֖ת מִנְחַ֣ת הַקְּנָאֹ֑ת וְהֵנִ֤יף אֶת־הַמִּנְחָה֙ לִפְנֵ֣י יְהוָ֔ה וְהִקְרִ֥יב אֹתָ֖הּ אֶל־הַמִּזְבֵּֽחַ׃

E, quando ele fizer a mulher beber as águas, acontecerá que, se ela se contaminou e agiu traiçoeiramente contra seu marido, as águas amargas entrarão nela para causar amargura, seu ventre inchará e sua coxa cairá, e a mulher será uma maldição entre o seu povo.

Jerusalem Talmud Sotah

From where that weaves precede presentations16Mishnah Menaḥot 5:6 states that weave always precedes presentation. One has to wonder about Rashi’s Yerushalmi text since in his commentary to that Mishnah he follows R. Jeremiah.? Rebbi Jeremiah in the name of Rebbi Pedat: They learned that from the case of the suspected wife17Since Num. 5:25 clearly prescribes first weave and then presentation.. Rebbi Yose said, the suspected wife is different because of its novelty and one cannot infer from anything that is different because of its novelty18While not in the tannaïtic rules, this is a generally recognized hermeneutical principle in both Talmudim; cf. Babli Ketubot 45a, Sanhedrin 27a. The novelty status of the suspected wife’s offering is explained in Mishnah 2:1; therefore, procedural instructions for this offering cannot imply similar instructions for the other flour offerings.. Rebbi Abun bar Ḥiyya understood it from the following19Lev. 6:7. This paragraph deals with technicalities of all flour offerings, whether they need weaving or not. Any special ceremony for certain offerings must precede the ceremonies common to all offerings.: “This is the teaching about the flour offering, present.” Where is the weave? It already preceded. Rebbi Yose said, explain it about flour offerings that do not need weaves; you cannot infer anything. Which [verse] says anything? “You shall bring,20Lev. 2:8: “You shall bring the offering made from these to the Eternal; the Cohen shall bring it and present it to the altar.” “These” are flour and olive oil.
The baraita is also quoted in the Babli, Menaḥot 60b.
” to include the ‘Omer flour offering in presentations. “He shall present,” to include the suspected wife’s flour offering in presentations. It is written after that21Lev. 2:9.: “He shall lift a fist full”; where is the weave22Which is prescribed for the offering of the suspected wife in Num.5:25..? It already preceded.
Perguntar a um rabinoBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Sotah

HALAKHAH: “He gives her to drink and after that he sacrifices her offering,” etc. What is the reason of the rabbis? “They shall come into her47Num. 5:24: “The curse-water shall come into her as a bitter one.” This is written before the description of the presentation of the flour offering in v. 25..” What is the reason of Rebbi Simeon? “After that he shall give to the woman to drink45Num. 5:27..” How does Rebbi Simeon explain the rabbis’ reason, “they shall come into her”? All of them, not part only48She has to drink the rather small amount of water completely. How do the rabbis explain Rebbi Simeon’s reason, “after that he shall give the water to the woman to drink”? Against her will, without her agreement49Cf. Mishnah 3. In the Babli, 19b, this is the position of the rabbis.. Rebbi Simeon agrees with the rabbis that if he gave her to drink and after that presented her offering, it is valid. The rabbis agree with Rebbi Simeon that if he presented her offering and after that gave her to drink, it is valid50This statement is not in the Babli. As Tosaphot (19a, s. v. ואחר) points out, the Babli does not object.. What is the difference between them? The commandment. The rabbis say that the flour offering checks her out51In the Babli, 20b, this is given as R. Simeon’s reason to require sacrificing the offering before the drink. but Rebbi Simeon says, the water is52Reading אִין as הֵן, equivalent of Babylonian אִינּוּן “they are”. Instead of אין, the Rome ms. has היו. The past tense does not agree with the rest of the text; it should be rejected. Note that there also exists a Babylonian אִין, equal to הֵן “yes”. what checks her out. What is the reason of the Sages? “A flour offering of remembrance remembering iniquity53Num. 5:15..” What is the reason of Rebbi Simeon? “They shall come into her47,Num. 5:24: “The curse-water shall come into her as a bitter one.” This is written before the description of the presentation of the flour offering in v. 25.54The same explanationas anonymous text in Sifry Num. 18; copied in Num. rabba 9(18)..” How do the rabbis explain Rebbi Simeon’s reason, “they shall come into her”? This teaches that it shakes all her limbs55Cf. Mishnah 4.. How does Rebbi Simeon explain the rabbis’ reason, “a flour offering of remembrance remembering iniquity”? This teaches that all iniquities she has committed are remembered at that time56Before the Heavenly Court which decides about the water’s action..
Perguntar a um rabinoBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin

Bar Qappara understood everything from here: May the Eternal bless you and preserve you, from here that one starts with three. May the Eternal illuminate His Presence for you and be gracious to you, from here that one continues with five. May the Eternal turn His Presence to you and give you peace, from here that one finishes with seven112From the verses of the priestly blessings, Num. 6:24–26, which have 3, 5, and 7 words respectively, one may infer that proceeding by 3,5,7 will give a blessed result. In the Babli, 10b, this argument is attributed to early Amoraïm; in Megillah23a it is applied to the number of people called to read from the Torah..
Perguntar a um rabinoBookmarkShareCopy