Talmud sobre Êxodo 12:7

Rebbi Immi asked, if he removed from group to group (the volume of two olives)³²⁹It seems that instead of כִּשְׁנִי זֵיתִים one should read בִּשְׁנֵי בָתִּים “in two houses”. Since “house” usually means a one-room dwelling, “house” also may mean “room” in a big house. he is twice liable, because of do not remove from the house and do not remove to the outside. If they subscribed to a Pesaḥ, and an individual removed the volume of an olive, he is liable. Two or three persons are not liable since the members of the group may be drawn after them; but they infringe on a positive commandment³³⁰Beginning of v. 12:46: In one house it shall be eaten.; and following Rebbi Simeon they do not infringe. As it was stated, over the houses in which they are eating it there³³¹Ex. 12:7., this teaches that the Pesaḥ may be eaten in two places³³²In the same room, as described in the Mishnah. Babli 86a/b.. I could think that its eaters also could eat it in two places, the verse says, in one house it shall be eaten. How is that? A Pesaḥ may be eaten in two places, but its eaters may not eat it in two places. [Rebbi Simeon says, also its eaters could eat it in two places.] How does Rebbi Simeon uphold in one house it shall be eaten? Lest part of one group eat inside and another part outside. An individual who removed the volume of an olive, since the members of the group may be drawn after him, becomes absolved from the positive commandment. Rebbi Ḥiyya bar Abba asked, why following Rebbi Simeon? Even following the rabbis, since the members of the group may be drawn after him, they are absolved from the prohibition; neither should they be under the positive commandment³³³Since the question is not answered it seems to be accepted. The positive commandment referred to is not in Maimonides’s list of commandments..