Levítico 6:16 Referências do Talmudee: Jerusalem Talmud Sotah, Jerusalem Talmud Shekalim, Jerusalem Talmud Yevamot & Makkot

“Her flour-offering.” Does that mean that it is sanctified in her name⁵A flour-offering in order to be valid must be offered by a Cohen in a Temple vessel on behalf of its owner (Mishnah Menaḥot 1:1). The Mishnah notes that “he (the husband) brings her (the wife’s) flour-offering.” Does this mean that the offering is to be offered only on her behalf?? Just as it is sanctified in her name, so it is sanctified in his name⁶It must be brought in both their names.. Rebbi Hiyya stated and disagreed⁷He does not disagree here at all; he supports the previous opinion. The text is from Halakhah 3:7 (fol. 19b line 37) where R. Ḥiyya disagrees. Cf. Tosephta 2:6.: “It⁸If a Cohen suspects his wife of adultery, the flour-offering cannot be burnt as a Cohen’s offering (Lev. 6:16) and cannot be eaten as the wife’s offering (Lev. 6:9). cannot be brought completely because of the participation by the wife. It cannot be eaten because of the participation by the husband.” He said to him, the handful⁹Of any flour-offering, a handful of the flour (with the incense) has to be burned on the altar and, normally, the rest is eaten by the Cohanim within the Temple enclosure (Lev. 6:7–11). is brought separately and the remainder is brought separately¹⁰This is a matter of dispute; R. Ḥiyya disagrees with the opinion that the remainders which cannot be eaten by the Cohanim have to be dispersed on the ashes but holds that they have to be burned as a kind of fuel (Halakhah 3:7, Babli 23a).. And you say, “her flour offering”? But the expression used by the verse is used by the Mishnah: “He shall bring her flour-offering for her.¹¹Num. 5:15.”

MISHNAH: On the Fifteenth⁹⁹Of Adar, in an intercalary year the Second Adar., money changers¹⁰⁰To exchange coins into silver half-sheqels, half a Roman tetradrachma, which are collected for the Temple. were sitting in the country side; on the Twenty Fifth they were sitting in the Temple¹⁰¹Since nobody is permitted to sit in the sacred domain (except possibly kings of the Davidic dynasty), these money changers had to sit on the Temple Mount, outside the sacred domain.. From the date they were sitting in the Temple one started to take pledges¹⁰²To foreclose on people who did not pay their Temple tax.. From whom does one take pledges? From Levites, Israel, proselytes, and freed slaves¹⁰³All these are adult male Jews subject to all commandments., but not from women, slaves¹⁰⁴Who are obligated only in cases women are obligated. Since women do not pay, the sheqel being a positive commandment due at a fixed time, slaves cannot be obligated., and minors. Any minor for whom his father started to give the sheqel does not stop any more. However one does not take pledges from Cohanim because of communal peace¹⁰⁵As explained in the Halakhah and Mishnah 4..
Rebbi Jehudah said: “Ben Kukhri testified at Jabneh that any Cohen who pays the sheqel¹⁰⁸Voluntarily, even if they cannot be forced to pay. does not sin. Rabban Joḥanan ben Zakkai told him, on the contrary, any Cohen who does not pay the sheqel does sin¹⁰⁹Since he reads the commandment Ex. 30:11–16 as not stating any exemption for Cohanim., only the Cohanim explain the following verse for their benefit: Any flour offering of a Cohen shall be totalled, it may not be eatenl¹¹⁰Lev. 6:16.. If the `omer, the two breads, and the shew bread are ours, how may they be eaten?l¹¹¹If they would pay the sheqel, they would be part owners of these offerings, but the consumption of all these offerings is explicitly commanded.”

May they bring one cereal offering together that would be totally burned¹²⁰The cereal offering of a Cohen in the Temple must be burned completely (Lev. 6:16). They may bring a cereal offering to the Temple and declare that it should be counted as the offering of the one of them who is a Cohen.? It was stated: They may bring one cereal offering conditionally that would be totally burned. May they bring two cereal offerings one of which should be burned totally and the other have a handful taken and the rest eaten¹²¹They may bring two cereal offerings to the Temple and declare that one should be counted as the offering of the one of them who is a Cohen and the other one as the offering of the slave. A handful of the second offering together with all its incense is burned on the altar and the rest eaten by the Cohanim under the rules of most holy offerings (Lev. 6:7–11).? It was stated: They may bring two cereal offerings of one which is burned totally and of the other a handful is taken and the rest eaten. May they testify together that it should be counted as testimony of one witness¹²²Slaves are not admitted as formal witnesses. (They are admitted to ascertain facts, such as the death of a man to permit the widow to remarry.) If their testimonies are identical, may the court accept the testimony of the one who really is a Cohen?? That would follow the rule of Rebbi Ze‘ira, Rav Isaac in the name of Rav Assi: Since if they were to be found perjured they could not be executed, the murderer could not be executed¹²³A false witness must receive the punishment that would have been meted out to the accused had his testimony been accepted by the court. Since a slave cannot be a witness in a criminal proceeding, he cannot be punished as a perjured witness. Since it is not known who of the two is a slave, neither of them can be punished. In the formulation of the Babli (Sanhedrin 41a): Testimony which is not subject to the penalties of perjuty is no testimony. The remark: “This applies here also” shows that the statement of Rav Assi refers to criminal proceedings in general. The murderer cannot be executed if one of the testimonies to his guilt is not subject to the penalties of perjury.. This applies here also.