Talmud sobre Malaquias 2:12
יַכְרֵ֨ת יְהוָ֜ה לָאִ֨ישׁ אֲשֶׁ֤ר יַעֲשֶׂ֙נָּה֙ עֵ֣ר וְעֹנֶ֔ה מֵאָהֳלֵ֖י יַֽעֲקֹ֑ב וּמַגִּ֣ישׁ מִנְחָ֔ה לַֽיהוָ֖ה צְבָאֽוֹת׃ (פ)
O SENHOR extirpará das tendas de Jacó o homem que fizer isto, o que vela, e o que responde, e o que oferece dons ao SENHOR dos exércitos.
Tractate Derekh Eretz Rabbah
He who cohabits with a maidservant is liable to the penalty for transgressing fourteen negative commands and also to the penalty of kareth at the hand of Heaven, viz.: Thou shalt not let thy cattle gender with a diverse kind;68Lev. 19, 19. The list given here is according to the text of GRA. Cf. Sanh. 82a (Sonc. ed., pp. 543f.). Thou shalt not sow thy field with two kinds of seed;69ibid. Neither shall there come upon thee a garment of two kinds of stuff mingled together;70ibid. Thou shalt not sow thy vineyard with two kinds of seed;71Deut. 22, 9. Thou shalt not plough [with an ox and an ass together];72ibid. 10. Thou shalt not wear a mingled stuff;73ibid. 11. All these laws forbid ‘mixtures’. Thou shalt not commit adultery;74Ex. 20, 13. Thou shalt not covet;75ibid. 14. And thou shalt not lie with any beast;76Lev. 18, 23. Neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God;77ibid. 21. also one on account of [laws concerning] a non-Jewish maidservant, a harlot, a niddah and a heathen woman. And one punishment of kareth, as it is stated, May the Lord cut off to the man that doeth this him that calleth and him that answereth out of the tents of Jacob, and him that offereth an offering unto the Lord of hosts.78Mal. 2, 12. If he was a lay-Israelite and profaned his seed with a maidservant or a heathen woman, he will have no ‘awakening’79i.e. instruction. ‘Awakening’ and ‘responding’ correspond in the Heb. to him that calleth and him that answereth in Mal. 2, 12. among the Sages and no ‘responding’ among the disciples. If he was a kohen, he will not have a son that offereth an offering unto the Lord of hosts.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jerusalem Talmud Shabbat
It was stated: If he stipulated about it208To move the table after the light stopped burning. it shall be permitted. Where do we hold? If following Rebbi Meїr, even if he stipulated it should be forbidden. If following Rebbi Simeon, even if he did not stipulate it should be permitted. But here we hold following Rebbi Jehudah, since Rebbi Jehudah says, a pottery light is disgusting, a table is not disgusting. From where did you understand to say, we are holding with Rebbi Jehudah? As it was stated: If a light was lying behind a door one opens and closes on the Sabbath if only he not intend either to extinguish or to make it burn. Rav and Samuel explain it about one who forgot but cursed one who would do this209In the Babli, 120b, the rule is positively accepted by Rav Jehudah, the student of Rav and Samuel; the curse is attributed to Abbaye two generations later.; May the Eternal extirpate the man who does this, awake and answering210Mal. 2:12..
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy