Талмуд к Вайикра 2:12

This implies that one item which was mentioned separately by necessity does not divide¹³⁶Since we found a reason why the item was mentioned one cannot infer that it is established as a separate rule.. If it was mentioned not by necessity it divides¹³⁷It is a general hermeneutical rule (No. 4) that two parallel items are just that, two separate items, and no additional inferences or comparisons are possible. If both are prohibitions, infractions generate separate liabilities.. If two items were mentioned separately, do they divide? Let us hear from the following: From where that he transgresses a prohibition whoever brings to the altar meat of a purification offering¹³⁸For purification and reparation offerings, blood is sprinkled on the altar and fat is burned. The meat must be eaten by the priests; it cannot be sacrificed., or meat of a reparation offering, or meat of most holy offerings¹³⁹Most holy offerings are elevation offerings which are completely burned, purification and reparation offerings already mentioned, and the public well-being offering accompanying the Two Leavened Breads on Pentecost which introduce the season of the wheat harvest. Only the last item can be meant here, where the meat also must be eaten by the priests., or meat from simply holy offerings¹⁴⁰The family sacrifices, of which only blood and fat are given to the altar, Lev. Chapter 3., or the remainder of the ˋOmer¹⁴¹The barley offering on the Festival of Unleavened Bread, of which a handful is burnt on the altar and the remainder must be eaten by the priests. Lev. 23:10. or the Two Breads¹⁴²The Two Breads to be brought on Pentecost, to be eaten by the priests with the meat of the public well-being offering (Note 139). Lev. 23:17., or the Shew Bread¹⁴³Of which the incense is burned on the altar; the bread itself has to be eaten by the priests, Lev. 24:5–9., or remainders of cereal offerings¹⁴⁴To be eaten by the priests after a handful was burned on the altar, Lev. Chapter 2., or leaven¹⁴⁵This again refers to the Two Breads, the only leavened offering., or date honey¹⁴⁶Which as an offering of first fruits is consumed by the priest after being presented to the altar but not brought onto the altar. Deut. 26:2.? The verse says¹⁴⁷Lev. 2:12., for any leaven or any date honey you may not turn into smoke as a fire gift to the Eternal. Therefore anything that had been given to the fire is under “do not turn into smoke”¹⁴⁸If any part or appendix had to be given to the fire on the altar, there is a prohibition to put any of the remainder on the altar..

Rebbi Eleazar asked Rebbi Joḥanan. Should not the Two Breads, being mentioned separately, teach about all sancta on the ramp¹⁴⁹The ramp on which the priest ascends to the altar since it is forbidden to build steps to the altar (Ex. 20:22). The ramp was physically separated from the altar.? He told him, it follows what was stated, the altar¹⁵⁰Lev. 2:12: As an offering of first fruits you may offer them to the Eternal but on the alter they shall not ascend for pleasant scent., this means not only the altar, from where to include the ramp? The verse says¹⁵⁰Lev. 2:12: As an offering of first fruits you may offer them to the Eternal but on the alter they shall not ascend for pleasant scent., on the altar they shall not be lifted. I could think neither as an act of worship nor as act of worship. The verse says¹⁵⁰Lev. 2:12: As an offering of first fruits you may offer them to the Eternal but on the alter they shall not ascend for pleasant scent., as aroma smell, I was saying this only as an act of worship¹⁵¹Since the ramp is inclined, stepping on the ramp in the course of a service would be “ascend for pleasant scent” and is forbidden. But depositing the first fruits on the ramp while the priest remains standing on the floor of the Temple court until he takes them to be consumed is not covered by the prohibition. Sifra Ṣaw Pereq 1(11).. (He retorted,)¹⁵²An addition from the corrector; this has to be deleted since the next paragraph shows that the speaker still is R. Joḥanan; the following is a continuation of the baraita quoted. them is a restriction¹⁵³Anything other than leaven and date honey is not covered by the verse.. For these one is liable on the ramp, for all other sancta one is not liable on the ramp. Because it is written them. If them had not been written, it would instruct¹⁵⁴Then leaven and date honey would just be examples of items to be consumed by the priests.. That means, two items which were mentioned separately do (not)¹⁵⁵A correction by the scribe himself but in error as shown by the next paragraph. separate¹⁵⁶To prohibit burning on the altar what must be consumed by priests or laity it would have been enough to give one example. Since two were given, it implies that bringing to the altar is a separate sin for each of them (and equally all others).. Rebbi Ḥananiah the son of Rebbi Hillel said, they do not separate, therefore they instruct¹⁵⁷Since they are mentioned in one verse they are not two independent items; previous argument is not applicable. Since it is a single item it permits inference for all sancta..