Komentaryo sa Deuteronomio 15:21: Rashi, Chizkuni, Ibn Ezra & Rav Hirsch

וְכִֽי־יִהְיֶ֨ה ב֜וֹ מ֗וּם פִּסֵּ֙חַ֙ א֣וֹ עִוֵּ֔ר כֹּ֖ל מ֣וּם רָ֑ע לֹ֣א תִזְבָּחֶ֔נּוּ לַיהוָ֖ה אֱלֹהֶֽיךָ׃

At kung magkaroon ito ng kapintasan, pilay o bulag, anumang malubhang kapintasan, huwag mo itong ihandog bilang alay sa Walang-Hanggan na iyong Diyos.

Rashi

מום [AND IF THERE BE] ANY BLEMISH [THEREIN, IF IT BE LAME, OR BLIND, OR HAVE ANY ILL BLEMISH, THOU SHALT NOT SACRIFICE IT …] — any blemish is a general statement,
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Chizkuni

כל מום רע, “any serious blemish;” for instance the offering to G-d as a sacrifice if it was born with a serious (permanent) blemish. (Sifri)
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Ibn Ezra

any serious defect which have been enumerated [Leviticus 22: 22 ff].
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Rashi

פסח או עור LAME OR BLIND is a particularization,
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Rashi

כל מום רע ANY ILL BLEMISH — it again comprises them in a general statement. How is it with the blemishes particularised? They have the characteristic that each is a visible (external) blemish and the animal never returns naturally to its original condition (i.e. never becomes free from the blemish). So, too, the general statement includes all such blemishes that are visible and incurable [while in the case of a transitory blemish the animal may be sacrificed when the blemish has disappeared] (Bekhorot 37a; cf. Sifrei Devarim 126:2).
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy