וְגָדֵ֤ר אֲשֶׁר־לַחוּץ֙ לְעֻמַּ֣ת הַלְּשָׁכ֔וֹת דֶּ֛רֶךְ הֶחָצֵ֥ר הַחִֽצוֹנָ֖ה אֶל־פְּנֵ֣י הַלְּשָׁכ֑וֹת אָרְכּ֖וֹ חֲמִשִּׁ֥ים אַמָּֽה׃
At ang pader na nasa labas, sa tabi ng mga silid, sa gawi ng panlabas na looban sa harap ng mga silid, ay limampung siko ang haba.
The Third Beit HaMikdash
“The wall facing the outside, [the space] opposite the chambers, leading to the Outer Courtyard before the chambers, was 50 cubits long.”12Yechezkel 42:7. Rashi comments: “The wall facing the outside: [The wall of the chamber] that separated between the chambers and the Outer Courtyard on the eastern side was 50 cubits long from north to south.” One may conclude that the corresponding wall of the chamber on the western side was also 50 cubits long. Rashi only mentions the eastern side because the verse only speaks of one wall, and Rashi thinks that it is referring to the wall that faced the larger portion of the courtyard.
The Third Beit HaMikdash
Thus, the verses seem to contradict each other. It is a third verse that resolves this contradiction.15In the original, Tosafos Yom Tov refers to the last of Rabbi Yishmael’s Thirteen Principles of Biblical Exegesis. By stating,16Yechezkel 42:7. “The wall facing the outside…,” it resolved that apparent contradiction. As Rashi explains, this verse is only referring to the wall on the east. That wall was 50 cubits long, and faced the Outer Courtyard. The chambers themselves were 51 cubits wide. On the eastern side, however, the extra cubit did not require a wall, because it was enclosed by the wall of the Inner Courtyard. For that reason, Rashi understands that the verse only mentions one wall, the wall of the eastern chamber. The wall of the western chamber, by contrast, was 51 cubits long, because there was nothing else enclosing it.