וַ֠יְהִי כְּֽהוֹצִיאָ֞ם אֶת־הַמְּלָכִ֣ים הָאֵלֶּה֮ אֶל־יְהוֹשֻׁעַ֒ וַיִּקְרָ֨א יְהוֹשֻׁ֜עַ אֶל־כָּל־אִ֣ישׁ יִשְׂרָאֵ֗ל וַ֠יֹּאמֶר אֶל־קְצִינֵ֞י אַנְשֵׁ֤י הַמִּלְחָמָה֙ הֶהָלְכ֣וּא אִתּ֔וֹ קִרְב֗וּ שִׂ֚ימוּ אֶת־רַגְלֵיכֶ֔ם עַֽל־צַוְּארֵ֖י הַמְּלָכִ֣ים הָאֵ֑לֶּה וַֽיִּקְרְב֔וּ וַיָּשִׂ֥ימוּ אֶת־רַגְלֵיהֶ֖ם עַל־צַוְּארֵיהֶֽם׃
At nangyari, nang mailabas nila ang mga haring ito kay Josue, ay tinawag ni Josue ang lahat ng lalaki ng Israel, at sinabi niya sa mga pinuno ng mga mandirigma na sumama sa kanya: “Lumapit kayo, ilagay ninyo ang inyong mga paa sa mga leeg ng mga haring ito.” At lumapit sila at inilagay nila ang kanilang mga paa sa kanilang mga leeg.
Ibn Ezra
הַנִּלְוׇה That hath joined himself. It is the past tense with a prefixed ה, which is here equivalent to the relative אשר that; comp. ההלכוא who went (Jos. 10:24)5The past of the Niphal of לוה is נִלְוׇה, the participle נִלְוֶה m., נִלְוׇה f. Because of the preceding בן הנכר the masculine is here required, and נִלְוׇה is consequently the past, third person masculine; the ה, which before nouns and participles has a demonstrative character, has before the past or future of a verb the power of a relative pronoun. This latter case is, however, very rare..
Ibn Ezra
אבו ═ אבוא They would. Comp. ההלכו ═ ההלכוא who went (Jos. 10:24)
Ibn Ezra
לוא Oh that. The א is paragogic; comp. ההלכוא that went (Jos. 10:24).
Rashi
ואתה על במותימו תדרך AND THOU SHALT TREAD UPON THEIR HIGH PLACES, just as it is said, (Joshua 10:24) “Put your feet upon the necks of these kings” (cf. Onkelos).