Komentaryong Sumisipi para sa Levitico 2:2

וֶֽהֱבִיאָ֗הּ אֶל־בְּנֵ֣י אַהֲרֹן֮ הַכֹּהֲנִים֒ וְקָמַ֨ץ מִשָּׁ֜ם מְלֹ֣א קֻמְצ֗וֹ מִסָּלְתָּהּ֙ וּמִשַּׁמְנָ֔הּ עַ֖ל כָּל־לְבֹנָתָ֑הּ וְהִקְטִ֨יר הַכֹּהֵ֜ן אֶת־אַזְכָּרָתָהּ֙ הַמִּזְבֵּ֔חָה אִשֵּׁ֛ה רֵ֥יחַ נִיחֹ֖חַ לַיהוָֽה׃

At dadalhin niya ito sa mga anak ni Aaron, ang mga saserdote; at kukuha ang saserdote mula roon ng isang dakot na puno ng kanyang kamay mula sa piling harina nito at mula sa langis nito, bukod pa sa lahat ng kamangyan nito; at susunugin ng saserdote ang bahaging pang-alaala nito sa ibabaw ng altar, isang handog na pinaraan sa apoy, isang mabangong samyo na kalugud-lugod sa Walang-Hanggan.

English Explanation of Mishnah Zevachim

The incense, The incense that is put on the altar with the “fistful” (see Leviticus 2:2). The same rules that apply to the fistful apply to it as well.
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Ibn Ezra

מזכיר לבונה he that burneth incense—comp. 4In his commentary on Leviticus 2:2, I. E. explains אזכרה memorial, that part of the offering which is to serve as a memorial of it before the Lord; he mentions, however, that many explain it, the part which was burnt upon the altar, and this opinion he seems to have adopted ultimately. Comp. I. E. on Hosea, 14:8.אזכרה incense (Lev. 2:2)—isguilty, מברך און as if he blessed iniquity.5A. V., As if he blessed an idol.
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Zevachim

As for the fistful and the frankincense, if one offered one of them [without the other] outside [the Temple], he is liable. Rabbi Elazar says: he is exempt unless he offers the second too. [If one offered] one inside and the other outside, he is liable. In order for the non-sacrificed parts of the minhah (meal) offering to be eaten, the fistful of the minhah and the frankincense must both be burned on the altar (see Leviticus 2:2-3). If one offers one of these outside of the Temple, he is still liable, according to the first opinion, even though he didn’t offer the other one. Rabbi Elazar says that he is exempt until he offers both the fistful and the frankincense, because one is not effective without the other. This matches his opinion in mishnah four. Rabbi Elazar agrees with the sages that if he offers one of them inside and then the other outside, he is liable. This is similar to the case in mishnah four where he offered most of a certain type of sacrifice inside the Temple, but left over an olive’s worth which he offered outside the Temple. Since this completes the offering, all agree that he is liable.
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Rashi

ללחם לאזכרה ON THE BREAD FOR A MEMORIAL — because of the bread itself nothing was offered to the Lord, but the frankincense was burnt when the former was removed from the golden table every Sabbath. It (the frankincense) thus served as a memorial for the bread, because through it, it (the bread) was recalled to memory Above (the bread itself was not offered) just as the “handful” of flour and of oil (Leviticus 2:2) was “the memorial portion” of the meal offering being the only part offered, while the remainder was eaten by the priests just as this bread was.
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Rashi

These trust in chariots Some nations trust in their iron chariots, and some trust in horses, but we pray in the name of the Lord, because the salvation is His. נזכיר is an expression of burning sacrifices and of prayer, as (in Isa. 66:3): “he who burns (מזכיר) frankincense,” (and in Lev. 2:2): “its memorial part (אזכרתה).” Therefore, they kneel and fall...
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Kiddushin

Para lamang sa mga Premium member